A fascist worked out today. Did you? You want to beat them in the war right user?

A fascist worked out today. Did you? You want to beat them in the war right user?

Attached: 1551089898375.jpg (1280x1614, 466K)

Other urls found in this thread:

rejectedprincesses.com/blog/modern-worthies/1077th-anti-aircraft-regiment
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1077th_Anti-Aircraft_Regiment_(Soviet_Union)
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Attached: liberall.jpg (1200x675, 133K)

No. Fight alongside.

Thanks for the reminder.

Yes, i did work out today.
I'm fascist btw if that matters

Joke on you, i am that fascist.

Attached: Jew_1.jpg (499x469, 40K)

No. Let the slave race row.

How are the old pics of machinists and krauts of all walks of life so aesthetic? Was it all propaganda or was this legitimately what the culture was like?

Stay weak mj

Attached: h3oj5uge21l21.jpg (644x960, 76K)

I am them, user.
Welcome to Jow Forums for the past few years.

Attached: 1552828923563.jpg (1600x1083, 684K)

Socialism = true aesthetic. Actual red pill. Don't be deceived.

I will spot for that fellow fascist

>A fascist worked out today
Yup, sure did

Attached: woa2vfml2wl21.jpg (960x608, 64K)

I didn’t work out yet.

I've read Marx and socialism just seems like some meme tier shit that is predicated on what was periodically going on in Europe under very ideal conditions tho.

I look at this picture and just imagine how she runs of autistically and tells a teacher. Then the boy gets in a shit ton of trouble, to the extent that the school suspends him and requires that he talks to some Holocaust survivors about how hate is bad or some gay shit like that. that girl just looks like the kind of person who would make a big deal out of the smallest joke and take this whole situation as a personal threat.

Explain your reasoning user

But hate is bad. It's poison of the soul. Don't you want to be strong

go back to /lgbt/ or /fa/ or whenever you crawled from

Jow Forums is, and always has been, a fascist board

Attached: CbEj6lQUkAAamm1.jpg (1200x1173, 134K)

Socialism is acceptance

Jow Forums has always been socialist newfriend

>A fascist worked out today. Did you?
you answered your own question

Hyper-satan speaks the truth

>Soviet wartime propaganda

I believe this image

I hit the gym twice comrade.

Attached: stalin kek.jpg (262x192, 7K)

I believe that Marx was right about industrial conditions being insanely poor for workers and that workers were abused by factory owners, but these arguments were hardly origonal. There were factory owners who tried to basically reinvent the wheel socially trying to solve this problem with a sense of utopian hubris (which is also totally understandable given what was going on in intellectual circles and all the things Europeans we learning or re-learning). Marx, or more so his desciples heavily exploited this collective hubris of idealism and the pain of the working class and tried to channel it into a new social metric, where, globally, we could strip away all existential fabric and fall in as a species under a new kind of materialism, ignoring or often punishing some of the most integral facets of the human condition under an all-powerful state. No space is un-owned, the state controls everything. No idea can be yours, the state determines what is said. It doesn't enhance what Epicuris taught in practice or even in theory, it mutilates it. I hate fascism for basically the same reasons, but they just legitmately have a better aesthetic imo.

btw I am still learning about this stuff so if this sounds uneducated it's only because I am uneducated.

Facts cant be propaganda

Post body. I've never seen an aesthetic lefty.

But Marx was the opposite of an idealist. He applies western logic to material conditions of the working class. Further he has been proven correct on the nature of capitalism. I would agree that the corporatism of the society union was an atrocity. But that is far removed from Marx my friend. What specific ideas from Marx do you take issue with?

ummm. Ever heard of Richard Burgess? dumbass right wingers

I've never seen an aesthetic rightist

yes and hans ulrich rudel destroyed 500 tanks

and those 6 gorillion goy

wartime records are propaganda bs

Why would we want to share our hard-earned gains with the dyels. They have the sticky and QTDDOT, it’s up to them to make it.

>national socialist

ftfy, breh

Attached: quote-muscle-mass-does-not-always-equal-strength-strength-is-kindness-and-sensitivity-strength-henry (850x400, 85K)

>national socialism

Oxymoron

was for

Ancom here comrades I'm about to smash them diddiylifts in a moment

>muh John Galt
Grow up

it's supposed to be. uncle addy was taking the piss out of the commies when he came up with the name

>nationalist
>socialist

Choose one

Actually it's ehebephilia

yeah, didnt think you would

Dialectic Materialism is the final redpill

Attached: 1.jpg (960x709, 139K)

Not him, but Marx was remarkably like Jow Forums, actually, a socially maladjusted general underachiever who undeservedly thought he was smarter than everyone. He also just knee-jerk called everything he personally didn't like bourgeois.

Also, that user is right. The society Marx envisioned was totally artificial. Marx rejected the family, which is the most natural and innate human society. He's also just a discount Rousseau, who was equally as disingenuous and perfidious.

>I've read Marx

Stopped reading right there

Great fitness thread. Thanks OP you fucking retard

>Socialism can only be international
wew

Attached: main-qimg-0b6d44caa10e566e4bf95f347f52ff5e.jpg (602x356, 44K)

Ive seen a interview on german state tv, where a stalingrad veteran talked about when reaching the volga with his panzer division, there was a woman regiment with Flak Guns.
Normally they can take down tanks with the right munition.
But he said they had no idea how to use their guns against ground troops so they killed all woman without losses.
Then he broke out in tears btw., because he couldnt handle it to kill woman.

>But Marx was the opposite of an idealist.
I never said Marx was an idealist, I said he (more so various proponents of Marxism) exploited the idealism of others. As an economist, I really don't mind him. I think his views were well established on basic market factors and that by reading some of his work you can see the patterns of abuse the rich often use on the poor.

My issue with Marx is that as an ideologue he went so far beyond his calling, and the truth is that the Bolshevists were not some bastardization of Marx. The very point was to tear down all social infrastructure and weaken all concepts which can't be managed centrally from the state. It is gross to me. And again I'm not saying fascists are more admirable necessarily, I think their architecture isn't that great either from what I've seen, but some of the pics I've seen of the people are just cool imo. Old stills of healthy-looking factory workers and happy people on picnics and bros working out in the sun, surprisingly wholesome stuff desu.

It takes like 1 hour to read the communist manifesto. I only read it because my humanities teacher kept going on about it (not kidding). It just isn't impressive to me, I read stuff from Seneca or the Volsung Saga and a few others that were surprisingly good. I want to read the Iliad but haven't asked around which translation I should look into.

"At about 1500 hours, the advancing kamfgruppen of von Strachwitz's Panzer Detachment from 2nd Panzer Regiment and 2nd Battalion, 64th Grenadier Regiment, approached Stalingrad's northern suburbs of Latashanka, Rynok, and Spartanovka (named Spartakovka on period maps but Spartanovka after the war) and the Stalingrad Tractor Factory south of the Mokraia Mechetka River. There they encountered gunfire from heavy antiaircraft guns and antitank guns operated by women, as well as infantry hurling hand grenades. However, virtually every one of these first rounds fired in the battle for Stalingrad missed Strachwitz's tanks. The Germans were more accurate in response, smashing 37 different antiaircraft positions. When the Germans later examined these positions the reason for the Soviet inaccuracy became obvious- the gun crews were composed entirely of civilian women, apparently factory workers and members of Stalingrad's antiaircraft defense (MPVO). Essentially these defenders were locals who had received only rudimentary instruction."

Glantz, David M., and House, Jonathan M., To The Gates of Stalingrad: Soviet-German Combat Operations, April-August 1942, University Press of Kansas, 2009. p.336

oh funny btw i googled it after my post, and there is exactly information about that woman regiment which fits exactly into the description of the soldier (end August, north of Stalingrad), but lol it says they gave the germans heavy casualties when i reality they just overrolled the woman fighters.
rejectedprincesses.com/blog/modern-worthies/1077th-anti-aircraft-regiment
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1077th_Anti-Aircraft_Regiment_(Soviet_Union)
Makes this not exactly more believable