Why are Gym bros more likely to be Alt Right?

Alt right is a misnomer, it's pure dragon energy

Well, if you have to actually earn a goddamn thing for yourself, you're not likely to be a communist. And if you aren't a communist, the communists that write shit like this consider you to be a ring wing asshole.

will this grating colloquial style of journalism die in our lifetimes

Not me

Attached: fightme.jpg (960x960, 71K)

It will die with the internet, study says (and that's a good thing)

There was actually a study done where they took a couple hundred people and measured the size of their biceps. No matter the economic situation of the subject, the big bicep subjects were more keen on voting right, while the weaker men were more on the socialist side. Scientists believe this has to do with survival of the fittest. Anyways, this just proves to me that the more test you have, the more logical you can think. Only women and cucks vote socialist, si ce they can't take care of themselves or their loved ones.

Because socialists tend to think like "I don't have to do anything, the 'community' has to give me all that I want. I can be as good as a parasite and put no effort to whatsoever. No matter how weak I am or lazy I am or stupid I am it is 'their' duty to make me happy."
You just won't meet many ppl of such lifestyle at the gym.

Good joke. Most people at the gym don’t look like they lift.

As for the question. It’s because most lifters are absolute fucking douchebags. It’s just a shitty culture and naturally attracts right wingers who fancy themselves as “alpha”.

pepe posters

High conscientiousness and low openness predict right wing politics, and I suspect probably also predict (initial) motivation to hit the gym. Obviously if you're a highly conscientious person you'll find it easier to stick with a routine, and people with low openness will prefer traditionally valued things like physical fitness.

The higher up you are on the hierarchy, the more you like it.

It's a short route to tyranny though, so don't get complacent or conceited.

don't forget the soviet era doping surplus roids

>It’s because most lifters are absolute fucking douchebags. It’s just a shitty culture and naturally attracts right wingers who fancy themselves as “alpha”.
Truth.

The funniest thing is that right wing politics are all about submission to a strong-man that the person identifies with. Right wingers love to get cucked by a big strong man.

Attached: 1541261564199.jpg (684x690, 113K)

youtube.com/watch?v=qxfyANt3qsE

Something gets called "alt right" if it's anything right wing that doesn't kiss the ass of the donor class with things like endless tax breaks and open borders.
You can make jokes if you like but that definition you'll find lines up perfectly.

The political left is in the opening stages of getting anything progressive that doesn't also do the same thing marginalized in a similar manner. Eg: how Pelosi/Schumer democrats feel towards AOC and Omar, (watch to see if the party tries to get their districts redrawn)

Attached: 1482078606130.jpg (480x360, 23K)

Just a ploy to keep beta-cuck left wingers from working out so they're stuck feeling insecure and unconfident to the point they think they need the help of larger bodies whether it be people or organizations so they keep voting democrat. It's a classic style of manipulation. When dying parties are circling the drain they tend to do stuff like that.

Before I started lifting, my whole life was a lie.

Attached: 1552467323285.jpg (680x608, 116K)

Go to a dentist for fucks sake

The believe in self suffiecincy is incompatible with any form of socialism. So in the onedimesional scheme of left and right the worldview of the average gymbro will be condensed and labeled as right.

People who train are more likely to be able to take care of themselves. That's it. This obviously means they are more likely to be conservative or right leaning.

because *honk honk*

Attached: E33E4278-73D5-4D5C-9C15-72E46A205C4B.jpg (540x332, 44K)

>”leave me alone and don’t touch my stuff”
>submitting to the strong man
What you chatting lol
If you vote left as a rich man, you are willingly spreading your cheeks for the state [see: strong man] and letting him take your stuff.
If you vote left as a poor man, you are sucking the cock of the state in the hopes that some of the stolen stuff comes to you.

>What you chatting lol
I don't talk to niggers.

>the body you get is purely a result of genetics + work + nutrition
>you can show off something you achieved with no outside help
>it shows you that work can be rewarding and you notice jealousy from non lifters

It is barely possible to lift and not end up being right wing since it essentially reflects right wing values.

Anyone who doesn't agree with the media

>bicep size measures strength
This only proves that curlbros are also more likely to be right wing, also being right wing is not “more logical” than being on the left that’s a dumb fucking assumption to make

>filthy communist
>thinks he’s better than blacks or literally anybody else

Attached: 045E87AD-3757-4687-9C85-F150CDE62431.jpg (484x490, 63K)

>>”leave me alone and don’t touch my stuff”
Not at all right wing, this is libertarian

>If you vote left as a rich man, you are willingly spreading your cheeks for the state [see: strong man] and letting him take your stuff.

That's not what's happening. The rich people voting for the left are in bed with the government and want those j00cy subsidies to keep flowing their way.

Probably a manlet anyways

>msm

Alt-righter confirmed.

>The funniest thing is that right wing politics are all about submission to a strong-man that the person identifies with.

Not at all like Vladamir Lenin or Chairman Mao, right comrade?

Attached: 1551594082938.jpg (592x432, 71K)

I thought libertarian was more like "The govt has no right to forbid me selling heroin to minors"...

Me

Small gov is the literal definition of right wing you retard.

males are more likely to be altright
also bodybuilder types are now extremely online and spend as much time on internet forums and youtube if not more than as they do in the gym

crypto fascists with memes

Libertarianism is right wing

right wing = capitalism
left wing = socialism

libertarians are also "well WHY CANT i marry a child?"

As is supporting Israel, and you can’t support the sheer size of the military with a small government

NO ITS NOT

ok brainlet

Leftists that want a socialist utopia but only for whites.
The reason they have “right” in their name is a mystery

>americans

Attached: 1522686860909.jpg (480x360, 22K)

fascists dont want socialism
fascism is the reactionary sperg out against left wing workers movements

People's politics is motivated by their psychology.

The socially conservative strain of right-wing politics comes about because conservative people identify with the aggressor of hierarchy-based violence. When Strongman hurts people, conservatives see themselves as the strongman and not as the victims - so they don't perceive the hierarchy-based violence as bad. They perceive it as reinforcing their position in the hierarchy, which they perceive as high because they identify with the strongman.

It's simple logic. The military is always conservative, because the traits that predict success in the military also predict conservative politics. So authoritarian regimes, which depend on the military to exist, are always socially conservative.

Basically, conservatives love to pretend that they're the one wearing the boot. If they're lucky they can maintain this delusion their entire life. If they're unlucky it gets dispelled pretty quickly when the white vans turn up outside their house to take them away.

>"but what about all the socialist dictatorships?"
Economically progressive, maybe, but without fail socially conservative. Do you know what they did to gays in the USSR? Nothing - because there are no gays in the USSR, comrade.

Attached: 1524831049771.jpg (1024x392, 69K)

Classical liberalism is very close to modern libertarianism. Wanting a smalll gov and Laissez faire economics is not exclusively right wing, it’s just that right wingers now gravitate towards that idea in certain instances

>Classical liberalism is very close to modern libertarianism
No it isn't. Adam Smith wanted to regulate banking and finance almost out of existence.

Pretty good post actually. Needs more (You)s

>Wanting a smalll gov and Laissez faire economics is not exclusively right wing
yes it is
that is neo-liberalism which is a particularly agressive form of capitlaism

all capitalist ideologies are right wing because the right side of the compass indicates capitalism.

Man Jow Forums really has gone to shit.

youtube.com/watch?v=PcrDH6cejAk

meaningless drivel
most conservatism is projected insecurities and reactionary stupidity

Diacetylmorphine the name heroin already implies you`ll get half hearted shit. The hypothetical mcdonalds of opioids would have clean quality stuff. That is basically the problem I have in general with term alt right. People use it for neonazis,libetarians,christian conservatives...Only in the US with only two parties tradiotinally voted for it`s enough common ground to agree on "Fuck these socialists."

reading this, i'm reminded of that study about leftits when asked to pretend to be conservatives, were unable to predict conservative viewpoints

this is just so wildly offbase, how do you think the military is a larp for people to vicariously bully other people

Attached: 1437012823288.jpg (718x1005, 523K)

Yeah, should have measured squat strength because the socialists are prepared to carry the weak on their shoulders, the right just needs biceps to grab as much as they can and hold on to it.

Kek

>how do you think the military is a larp for people to vicariously bully other people
I don't.

Read closer and you will have less difficulty understanding.

Everything to the right of Maoism.

maybe they should measure asshole laxity, the more lax the hole, the more left wing

or better yet combine the two and measure the ratio

If only they had food and barbells

kek

>because the socialists are prepared to carry the weak on their shoulders
>so dyel that they drop the weak, causing mass starvation and death in literally every socialist country

Attached: 633ED009-84F7-4707-83D1-336E6AAF9DD0.jpg (387x353, 24K)

they had both

You should learn what neo-liberalism really means (stron govt. regulations where needed), not the warped shadow image everyone and their mum paints it to be nowadays.

Please name a major communist country that didn't suffer massive food shortages up to and including mass starvation

cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP84B00274R000300150009-5.pdf

USA had famines too when it was industrialising, champ.

Attached: 1549435017469.png (691x54, 12K)

>confusing deaths from industrialization at an extremely fast pace to collective ownership of capital
industialization has killed a fuck ton of people in every corner of the globe everytime it goes into full swing. centrally planned economies were able to accelerate how quickly they could industrialize but it means the growing pains happen all at once. America and europe have likely killed the same percentage of their people during industrialization, but did so at a much slower rate over hundreds of years. industrailization is effectively uprooting and restructuring society into something completely different and some people that were needed before get sent to the wolves.

They drop the weak because the US kicks them in the knee mid squat just in case everyone else realises that it works and cross fit (maximum exertion for minimum gain) is a meme even though it looks exciting and useful on the surface.

>X occasionally has major problems
>Y has failed catastrophically literally every single time it has been tried
These two sentences are not the same

that's a nice strawman

Interesting one page report from 1983. Doesn't mesh very well with all the late soviet jokes about food shortages or the reports of visitors to western countries being shocked on visiting supermarkets.

Only the American bastardization of libertarianism

Also note that despite possessing a great deal of excellent agricultural land the Soviet imported significant amounts of grain from the West, particularly the USA.

>failed catastrophically literally every single time it has been tried
But it hasn't. USSR was a superpower that rivalled the USA, and could have taken all of Western Europe in a week at any point prior to the mid-1980s.

>"but muh quality of life"
Being able to consume endless piles of bullshit does not quality of life make, as you should well know if you've spent more than five fucking seconds on this board.

>um well ackshually i prefer to believe jokes than the cia
By 1983 the USSR's economic problems were mostly over. They would only return during perestroika.

>the US, a capitalist country, is so strong it can snap its fingers and crash any socialist up-and-comer with no survivors, just for jokes.
>unironically choosing to be the weaker party

you should learn what the fuck you're talking about
neoliberalism was spearheaded by reagan and thatcher.

india is a capitalist country and has food shortages
bangladesh is a capitalist country and has food shortages
nigeria is a capitalist country and has food shortages
kenya is a capitalist country and has food shortages
America is a capitalist country and still has food drives, homeless shelters, soup kitchens, food stamps, etc.

this is CURRENT DAY not fucking a century ago before mechanized farming and agricultural science were able to massively increase crop yield. So whats the explanation for why these capitalist countries are starving?

I hope you burn in hell you worthless commies fucks.

Attached: commiedeath.gif (580x2450, 165K)

>USSR was a superpower that rivalled the USA
Nope
>muh red tide
Nope, Glasnost showed us USSR was a paper tiger, there was literally never any threat other than a nuclear sperg-out from the Soviets.
You’d have a better chance pushing your dick through a cheerio than the soviets had of breaking through the Fulda gap.

I think it's because people who work out have a mindset where you have to work to improve yourself and your situation, whereas leftists expect everything being handed to them because "fairness".

>muh 60 gorillions

Attached: 1526989818987.png (800x2449, 820K)

>Choosing to be the greedy bully and imposing your own, intrinsically unfair doctrine on everyone else instead of minding your own business and letting everyone else do their own thing in their own country.

>grenada wants universal education and healthcare with strong workers rights
>gets invaded by america for being "marxist"
HAH grenada cant stand up to america, that proves the superiority of capitalism!

9.1 million people starved to death last year in a world that is entirely capitalist. whats the explanation behind that?

Cuba is the only socialist country left and nobody starved to death in cuba last year.

>Nope
Sure fooled the USA from 1945-1991 then. All those silly generals and presidents.

>Glasnost showed us USSR was a paper tiger
Because by the late 1980s, it was. Even by the early 1980s the rot was starting to set in.

the soviets literally couldve steamrolled all of europe and the UK in the 50s if it wanted

>being this retarded

who are Hayek and von Mieses when you can spout muh thatcherism... pathetic

>Thinking that China doesn't have you bent over a barrel ready to fuck you raw if it ever decided to be as big a faggot as you.

Post address.

How many of the those 9.1 million were in African shitholes where local warlords strangle food distribution in so they can play biggest dick in the tribe?

>leftists expect everything being handed to them because "fairness".
leftists want a system where you do all the heavy ass reps and get all the gains
righties want a system where you do all the heavy ass reps and the gym owner takes most of your gains for gracing you with access to barbells

Eh I've been to cuba. It only works because they don't allow engineers and doctors to leave the country and they are an island. They are mostly happy though.