Just a quick little reminder to brain dead janiturrrs that GR 3 is not enforced on this board :^)

1. no i am above average in smartness
2. yes but not in that way
3. no i like women
you post foot centric drawings of underaged girls and likely enjoy them in a sexual way
am i wrong
>romania

>1. no i am above average in smartness
prove it
>2. yes but not in that way
dont believe you
>3. no i like women
no you like animals (male)

I only posted the OP image cause it's the first one I found desu, dont really care about feet, and footfags are usually pretty weird.

also shinobu isnt underage

please stop this slander

is she drawn to look like that like of those 2000 year old vampires™

okay, since you asked nicely, but only if you stop yours desu

500 years

Attached: Shinobusmile.gif (800x450, 1.7M)

I haven't watched monogatari so I don't really know to be honest.
She's cute though so I don't care.

This vampire requires a lot of donuts1

Attached: 38242675_p0.png (630x750, 258K)

cute as in "aw look how cute" or cute as in "i want to fuck this because innocence turns me on"

all cute vampires love donuts

Attached: 1519110590689.png (1000x1000, 360K)

Panaino!

Attached: Shinobu4.jpg (1280x720, 91K)

Bit of both I guess? Not sure really. I do find lolis sexually appealingly sometimes, if that's what you're getting at.

dumb pedophile

prove both of those accusations dumb furfag

you literally jusy admitted you like some drawings of little girls in a sexual way
how is that not a form of pedophilia if you actively seek it out

Drawn lolis look nothing like real little girls though. I've seen real little girls, I don't find them attractive.
It's like how you find drawings of animals attractive, doesn't necessarily make you want to fuck real animals.

>Drawn lolis look nothing like real little girls though
except for the fact that their body type looking like a little girl's is an integral part of the "loli" moniker
>It's like how you find drawings of animals attractive
???
>(liking furry) doesn't necessarily make you want to fuck real animals.
yeah no shit because they're complete fantasy creatures with no real world counterpart

based
but also dumb pocket monster

Attached: 2018-05-01_04.35.40.jpg (720x720, 238K)

labib more like dr. pibb

>their body type looking like a little girl's is an integral part of the "loli" moniker
>they're complete fantasy creatures with no real world counterpart
This is a complete double standard I have no idea what kind of mental gymnastics you're using to justify this. Their counterparts are animals. Looking like animals is an integral part of the "furry" moniker.

Jannies are chucklefucks who need to go over the global rules and what applies to Jow Forums again desu
>inb4 banned for complaining about mods
GR 8 doesn't apply to Jow Forums either

Attached: Riko 50.png (1280x960, 1.55M)

This happens every other time I make a thread now. They literally banned me for that OP image.

based

Attached: 8651.png (416x288, 8K)

>take an animal
>give it an extremely humanoid body shape
>give it sapience
>alter its anatomy heavily
>draw it as anime
vs.
>take a little girl
>draw her as anime

not the same thing retard

You're wrong.

>take anime girl
>make her short and flat
That's a loli.

wrong
a girl can be short and flat without looking young

It has nothing to do with being young, I'm not attracted to her age.
If a character is short and flat she's a loli to me, that's what I find attractive and cute. And as you said, a girl can be like that without being underage.