Robot perspective needed:

Robot perspective needed:
Why is talking to a man like pic related?
Why are men so selfish?

Attached: how did i get here.jpg (540x519, 98K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/WCXe_b8RVcg
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Because you are nothing more than the sum of the quality of you're cock-holes. :^))))

>is every interaction with a man supposed to feel like emotional labor
people are shit. putting up with their shit is one of the ways you grow, or whatever the hell. when did this idea that human interaction should always be pleasant emerge?

Attached: download (4).png (251x201, 8K)

Bitch I have to go to work for 40 hours a week with coworkers who hate me because I'm quiet to make barely enough money to live and you're bitching about talking to a man? I hope someone comes and rapes you and then kills you.

I will never cease to be delighted by the SJW pattern of taking clinical PTSD terminology and using it in nearly the exact opposite of what was intended, thereby increasing the dysfunction and dependence of those who drink the koolaid.

Well not giving a fuck works better in the long run

my god in heaven...why are women so retarded

Attached: 1544212984249.jpg (1280x960, 163K)

when you generalize 3.5 billion people. choose who you talk to there is plenty who are not interested in only sex

99% of that interaction existed exclusively in her own fucked-up head. This is neurosis painted as virtue.

>can't read

can't read

this is a valid point, but imagine if the roles were reversed.

everyone works 40 hours a week with coworkers they hate and not enough to pay rant AND buy groceries, you are not special, you do not suffer more than anyone else.

Jesus christ I think that comic isn't an ironic joke.

The concept of "emotional labour" is basically invented by dumbass women who feel that being smug, superior, and patronizing is some great burden on them and that it's unacceptable that they're not getting compensated for it.

>everyone works 40 hours a week

Attached: neet.jpg (236x214, 7K)

how come women have to condescend to men? Read a fucking book.

>cares about grammar but cant spell out you.
This speaks levels about women.

>everyone works 40 hours a week with coworkers they hate and not enough to pay rant AND buy groceries
I not only pay rent and buy groceries but only work part time and drink alot.

>and she'll still send nudes anyway

Attached: 1542496392526.gif (243x200, 475K)

Becuase men have values that are a part of their personality and wont toss it away for validation is a bad thing?

>when did this idea that human interaction should always be pleasant emerge?
this man knows the truth.

Let me give a concrete example. I have the 'tism. I wanted to get a job but not be a diversity hire. I managed to get a job without being a diversity hire and started working under a woman.

Man I was a bit lacking in social skills and I'm a bit different. So what does she do? Fucking track down my family, get my medical history, spread it to my co-workers, and now pats me on the back and says "Things must be so hard for you" regularly. This is the kind of "emotional labour" I'm exposed to. Minor stalking, disclosure of personal info behind my back, and constant patronization. This puts me in a situation where I'm doing a lot of "emotional labour" coping with her crap. This situation has nothing to do with my lack of book learnin'

Yup. Wisest post in the thread.

The person who made the comic in the OP convinced themselves that talking to an unintelligent man who is complimenting them constantly makes them some sort of victim. Self-victimisation and the idea of being entitled to not face any sort of hardship is what's killing society.

>"u"
>total lack of capitalization or punctuation
>terribly constructed sentences
>still act like a grammar nazi

>when did this idea that human interaction should always be pleasant emerge?

It's because no one will interact with people for no reason. Unless someone is your boss or parent, why would you ever talk to them if it's not pleasant? That's just a waste of time since you're not getting anything out of it.

>and she'll still send nudes anyway

Of course.

This bait is retarded and OP is retarded. OP, you are retarded please get on your knees and commit seppuku immediately.

If you thought I was going to ask for a BJ you are too full of yourself. Please cut deeply.

youtu.be/WCXe_b8RVcg

Men live their entire life without being encouraged to think about their actions or people around them. When they date someone who expects the bare minimum of empathy they just malfunction and shut down.

Attached: 1546804325923.jpg (1024x532, 52K)

Guys do the same thing but their thought bubble is efficient.

"What a dumb bitch" vs " cacophony of liberal arts bullshit"

Men aren't very sophisticated when it comes to developing their could-I-conceivably-convince-a-hypothetical-onlooker-that-someone-is-wronging-me-currently lens.

Asking for nudes is retarded, but so is bring a grammar nazi. Reddit is only a quick url search away

more like painfully reminded of her narcissism. that's really women's problem when you get right down to it, they're narcissists.

it's the opposite, women are taught to only care about themselves and men are taught to be slaves to women.

Men usually don't subscribe to made up boogey men like privilege and internalized anything. Men will judge you based on actions and words.
If you really think you are doing someone a favour by 'deconstructing' your 'privilege' for them you deserve at least a participatory medal in mental gymnastics.
Oh and by the way, people who use a language on the daily should be versed in grammar as well as vocabulary.

Women are evil, who knew?

>saying no is emotional labour

Being direct about what you want is a positive quality. Being a passive victim who takes everything personally and constantly ruminates and then blames their depression and anxiety on 'men', thus generalizing for almost half the population and allowing them to rationalise prejudice is obviously negative.

I've noticed something about a lot of straight, white, women: their perspective is the only one that matters. They're solipsistic and attached to their thoughts and feelings to the point of dysfunction. I am a trained therapist who enjoys his job so much he practices it for free online. Here's what treating women is like:

>you can't contact them first without them assuming you want sex, aka, 'slide into their DMs'
>you can't ask too many questions otherwise they begin to believe you're using them for information gathering
>you can't give them direct advice otherwise they assume you're grooming them
>you can't talk about yourself, even unemotionally, because then you're 'using them as a therapist'

It's no wonder PD is so common in women. My specialty is actually PD, and so I regularly help both men and women by pointing out their dysfunction, explaining how it's dysfunctional, and having them think of ways to improve their mind and behaviour.

Men are relatively easy, they readily see themselves objectively.

With women, though? With women I have to literally record conversations and play it back to them to get them to even begin to see themselves objectively. If you simply point out what they just said seconds earlier they will immediately lie about it.

A lot of therapy is simply having people accept their flaws. Women, especially young women, don't readily do this. You tell them how inconsiderate they acted in a previous session and they will respond with 'well, that doesn't sound like me'. Their dysfunction is almost always built around narcissistic solipsism, and they have egos made from titanium.

>emotional labor
And fucking dropped

And you know, I get it. Of course I understand this is simply trauma in response to trauma. You grow up innocent and naive not accepting that many men will say and do anything to fuck you. They gaslight you, and that's horrible, but as a result you become masters of gaslighting.

>"but white supremacy"

Has that term just lost all meaning now

(You)
gr vfhcexwjde3higy3rviuc\hwdijefohv,fiedxjpwfc.hoer ooooooooooooooh oOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Fembots

>he didnt sue her

Your fault desu

Do people really do that? They see someone do a stupid but ultimately unimportant mistake and then begin thinking about society and white supremacy and shit? I honestly find this hard to believe.

>why would you ever talk to them if it's not pleasant?
To dislodge your head from your own asshole
>That's just a waste of time since you're not getting anything out of it.
Well, you know. Besides a reprieve from your insulated myopic echo chamber reality. But hey, who gives a fuck about growing as a person when you can be a shallow self-absorbed reptilian piece of shit, right?

I want to hit whoever wrote this for thinking judging someone on their speech and grammar is white supremacy and oppressive, stupid regressive virtue signalling cunt.

>Texts with average-looking male who makes thoughtful conversation and types in complete sentences
>"Umm I'm just not that interested"
>Chad sends "your p sexy send nudes bb ;)"
>"FUCK ME RIGHT NOW"

Attached: 1549252229729.jpg (740x424, 56K)

You forgot the part where she will still nitpick every word the average guy said but conveniently forgets to do so in the other case.

I thought females were supposed to be the le empathetic sex with a higher degree of emotional awareness and intelligence than their male counterparts. Why then are foids so terrified of """emotional labor"""? It's like they view the mere act of empathizing with another person or thinking from the perspective of anyone who isn't exactly like them and not acting like selfish little psychopaths as some kind of intolerable, overbearing effort unfairly forced upon them lmao.

>get message from girl
>overanalyze it
>try to think of a response
>immediately feel like you messed up
>get left on read anyways
How selfish of me

Attached: Pat sad coffee cropped.jpg (467x338, 32K)

I'm convinced that's just an idea women flaunt for appearances, we all know how women love appearances and can't stand being honest.