Purityfags BTFO. You virgins literally can't refute this

It's more like if someone cummed on your cheerios and then got a paper towel to clean them up.

I don't even want cheerios that have been opened for too long
they'll be stale
fuck stale boxes that have been chewed up and spit back in like this cuck is suggesting

Attached: 1545306061041.jpg (854x480, 33K)

This asshole tries to act like he's smart and logical yet he fails to understand that biologically men are different than women. We are sexually dimorphic and have separate mating stragedies. Women are held to a different standard than men because women are different than fucking men. They are the child bearers. There's a lot more at stake if a woman sleeps around compared to a man since the woman could end up pregnant or could be attacked by a potential mate while a man spreading his genes has little consequence. Also it's fucking easy for a woman to screw around with every guy on the block because guys always wanna fuck so it isn't commendable and is actually irresponsible and dangerous for society. While a guy who is able to sleep around needs to be high value since women are fucking picky about who they just casually fuck. It has to be some super charismatic rich and fameous 6ft tall giga Chad. So yeah this faggot needs to focus his crashcourse on basic human biology or some shit and stop trying to be so PC to appease his cucked fanbase.

Attached: gigachad.jpg (1068x601, 65K)

If women prefer not sleeping with virgins, why is it unfair for me to prefer a virgin?

But cheerios aren't special. That's kind of the point

>As a proud virgin, I have every right to only seek a relationship with a fellow virgin.

Not only do you have that right, but I would argue that you have somewhat of a responsibility as well. There is a special virgin out there who deserves you, and you should select them as a lifetime partner, as a reward to them.

Virgin+virgin is the best lifetime pairing, and we should strive to maximize it whenever possible.

fake
girls should be virg ONLY then can they enjoy my slimy NEET cock

It's natural to get mad at the information of male competition, especially in sexual context. It's called masculinity and testosterone.
This is truth and the motivation behind almost all "justifications" for hating the phrase "I have fucked other men before".

Attached: 1552275298641.jpg (193x200, 4K)

>closes Jow Forums
Yes but womens genitalia degrade with more sex, whilst men doesn't

Nice trips

For everyone saying that
>food =/= humans
It's a metaphor. If my dick has been in 9 women and the relationships broke, but the 10th is the lucky winner, and lucky winner girl is a virgin, so what?
I had fun having sex through my years, and then I found a person.

Now gender flip it. Y'all virgin boys should be lucky to find a girl to teach you how to have sex. Sex can be awful if you don't know what you're doing.

>Inb4 muh clean bill of health, whores have herpes
You can get scabies from hugging people. You can get the flu from breathing air near other people. STDs are usually cureable. Sometimes they're not. Would you not love someone because they have MS? If they got cancer, even if they tried to avoid it their whole life?
If you don't love them then, you never loved them to begin with.

>it particularly bothers me that women are held to a different standard on this than men

Men and women aren't the same and don't want the same things.

>It's completely ego related, not really rational

Incorrect, at least if you're looking for a long term, committed relationship. In that context looking for someone who hasn't been a hookup artist or serial "monogamist" is about as irrational as looking for someone who isn't a felon when recruiting for the police. It's not a matter of "fair" or not, it's just looking for what you're looking for.

>She has a need for a lot of sex

This isn't relevant.

There are plenty of virgins who have a strong (unfulfilled) need for a lot of sex. I'm sure there's a few robots out there who can confirm this fact.

Actually mens degrades much faster, it's not even a debate.

But this is only about sex. Of course you should have your guard up if you found out your gf was a former slut

>strong need
>don't go outside to get laid
unlikely man

>Cheerios just let anyone who comes by eat them

Well, that's something that I have in common with Cheerios, then.

Of course I would. But if hugging them meant I would get it as well, you can be sure as hell I won't be hugging that person anymore.

Nothing's only about the sex. That's the trick of hookup culture, thinking that the physical and the mental are detached.

>Equating having sex with eating a bowl of cereal

And this is why I hate everything. Sex should only be practiced within a marriage between a man and a woman.

that guy looks like a virgin and has virgin glasses. watchu mean homie?

If I fucked a 100 girls, I wouldn't give a shit if 101 had been fucked by the best dick in the world.

I just want to START at a same playing field. Why do people find that so hard to comprehend?

I wouldn't feel that much about a random thot after a one night stand

This, but for poor people. i'd prefer they never married but if we can restrict them from performing basic human functions like sex until marriage, that would be good.

>Now gender flip it. Y'all virgin boys should be lucky to find a girl to teach you how to have sex. Sex can be awful if you don't know what you're doing.
lmao what
oh no the first time wasn't perfect, the relationship is over now.

>Hugging that person anymore
Implying, forever?
Scabies is cureable
Would you go back to them, once they were free of disease?
Or would you forever judge them?

You would be surprised. Modern day normie are on a new level of degeneracy and hedonism.

Because you are inherently making things harder for yourself and thats kinda stupid to most people.
I haven't heard of that position before but I get it desu

>Yes but womens genitalia degrade with more sex, whilst men doesn't

Having dicked the same woman several times per week for 19 years, I can say this is false.

Actually, my dick has been the thing that's degraded more, as I now need Viagra to keep up the pace.

If you're not a degenerate hedonist it would be awkward for you to browse Jow Forums, i bet.

Things are only considered bad here if normies do them as well

>O no the relationship is over now
No, if you both are bad communicators, then you may have painful or unfulfilling sex for months while still trying to be in a relationship. But it puts a strain on the relationship, until you communicate better, or it breaks.

The issue is the black-and-white mentality. Volcels and purityfags put so much pressure on the partner being the virgin. Like it's gonna be the first and last relationship. That's a lot to hold out for, and it very rarely happens. Why put up so much expectation for it? It's just sex. Humans have been doing it for our entire fucking existence.

Wait, is the guy in OP's image being serious? Thought he was trying to make a point with a bad argument. Poor brainlet :(

Attached: 20190224_182316.jpg (390x470, 43K)

>lol if you can't handle me at my worst, then you don't deserve me at my best
also, you can't control whether you get the flu, MS, or cancer, but you can control whether you get STDs, by not sleeping with or associating with someone who has them. They're practically the only type of disease out there you can reduce your chances of contraction to 0% for. And such people to avoid are usually people who sleep around more of the time, since the more people they sleep with, the higher their chance of contracting one; this goes for both men amd women. But it's a lot easier for a woman to sleep around than a man, so that's why a lot of men have it as a concern.

Why on earth would I willingly put myself in a position to be infected, curable or not?

If they were cure free, fine whatever. But if they constantly put themselves in a position where they can easily get scabies, yeah I'm not gonna hug that person and will judge them for there lack of caution.

How so? You think this website is self-contained to just this board and others you might think is degenerate?

Its actually obvious. What do you mean

>That's a lot to hold out for, and it very rarely happens. Why put up so much expectation for it? It's just sex
I'm not interested in just sex. And it's not difficult to hold out until you are sure you are with someone worth it. Unless you are a pleasure monkey like most.

Ever heard of STDs OP? Your also as bad as a Jow Forums tranny if your life revolves around sex.

Attached: 1540074684576.jpg (746x888, 285K)

are you worth it though homie? most people get their heads out of their asses by age 18

Obvious how.
Are you referring to the porn ads and pictures that get posted here?

No I'm not man

>are you worth it though homie
What do you even mean, nigger?

>Do you think it matters
Yes.

Attached: 1ebb7f76104b6c09a25448742268642757c8f8d0.png (402x398, 116K)

>You can control whether you get STDs
>Being born with AIDS
>A choice

>It's a lot easier for a woman to sleep around with a man
Lemme paint a picture
>Stacy and Chad bang
>Stacy falls in love
>She starts to decline other offers of sex because she wants to be with Chad Only
>Chad wants to get his dick wet
>Roastie and Chad bang
>Roastie falls in love
>Same shit
>Fembot and Chad bang
>Repeat
>Chad doesn't tell anyone he's sleeping around
>These girls don't know they're connected

Yeah, it's pretty shitty. Just don't fall for lying bitches and you'll be fine.
But sometimes it happens. Lust blinds.
If you wanna take it slowly, that's fine. No one is telling you not to. You wanna be with a virgin only, cool, whatever.

But stop thinking that you're better than someone else because you haven't had sex yet. It's so childish, and it's telling that you're not emotionally ready for sex. Which is fine. I ain't gonna sleep with you lmao

That's just it, you don't have to have anything to do with them. You can avoid them for your entire life. Great. Good job.
But it doesn't impact your life in any way. Why are you wasting time and energy hating something if you don't let it affect you? Why judge someone for their life choices, when you're making life choices?

Like, damn, addicts don't set out to become addicted. They need support, but sometimes they're too toxic and a lost cause. Find the people who matter to you, and stop wasting energy on the ones that don't matter at all, you know?

I mean, the act of sex is just sex.
For some people it means a lot more.
For others it doesn't.
You can have a relationship with sex, and without sex. It's more important that you vibe with the person. But also sometimes you wanna get fucked. If you have the ability, why not give it a go?

this desu, there really isn't any double standard because the standards aren't created by both genders together, men want virgins because it signifies that his significant other may not be a homewrecker, females have different standards for men in that the more pussy he has the higher his market value. This is a generalization of course.

are you worth it for someone?

>But stop thinking that you're better than someone else because you haven't had sex yet. It's so childish, and it's telling that you're not emotionally ready for sex
Whoa dude stop, that's a judgement. You do stuff too right? so stop judging

>men want virgins even though 99.9999% of virgin women end up with a 2nd partner

Wasn't John Green already "cancelled" a while back by these people for all the white protganists and "uwu shyboi misunderstood nerd MC"

Anyways I'm glad the YA hype is dead and John Green is no longer relevant as he was in the early 2010s

Definitely. Though isn't that a different issue?

Beta orbiters BTFO
fuck you bot this is an original comment

Attached: sodapop.jpg (889x960, 116K)

I love how every time this gets posted it triggers so many incels.

I'm trying to decipher your point and failing at it.

>Wasn't John Green already "cancelled" a while back by these people for all the white protganists and "uwu shyboi misunderstood nerd MC"
I had no idea about that. Rip him, I guess. It seems to me that YA is still very much a thing, but I really don't know for sure, since I don't read any. My sisters used to read that kind of stuff a lot, and they still do, but they've branched out to other things.

not really, no. good luck lol

Given that the mother does things like take the proper antiretroviral drugs during pregnancy and delivery, choose to have a C-section, avoid breastfeeding, and allow antiretroviral drugs to be given to the child, the chance of contraction is about 1%.
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1586/eri.10.94?scroll=top&needAccess=true

It's not 0% but it's pretty damn close, and the element of choice is still there, except it's the mother's choice, not your own. For those other diseases, no one has a choice. And once you get past that stage and don't have HIV, you can keep that chance at 0% for your whole life. It's still lower than probably every other type of disease.

I don't care whether the girl is a virgin or not, she's free to do whatever she wants if she doesn't hurt other people, but to act like this isn't a legitimate concern in almost every casual sexual encounter is baffling.

I wouldn't want to eat cereal from the same bowl as someone else.

But it is, you passive aggressive cunt. My wrong for assuming you had something of relevance to say.

all right, so how about i fuck your wife and then you tell me how much it doesn't matter who she sleeps with

>Food analogies
The fuck is up with normies comparing sex to food?
You can't have any like intimate relationships to food

>implying real women matter in 2019

sex dolls are 10/10 supermodel virgins and real women are irrelevant

Attached: sexdoll.jpg (1080x1753, 462K)

But after 5-10 years of one night stands with a variety of thots, you'll be able to feel a lot for one woman, right? She'll be able to look up into your eyes while you're balls deep inside her and see real emotion rather than rote mechanical pumping, right?

Of course she won't. You'll have purged all such capacity for such emotions as society demands; as they tell you is good, as such feelings are considered just naivete. And the woman in question probably won't be able to feel it either, as she'll have purged those capacities even more thoroughly.

Hating on who?
You sound like you are projecting these false ideas onto me and who I am.
I don't give a shit what people do. And even if I did, I have the right to judge them how I see fit. Does that mean I'm using all my resources and time on judging them? Absolutely not

> different standard than men

Thats on woman. I couldnt care less if Chad fucked 2 or 20 woman, its woman that cream their pants with pussy slayers.

And if we continue with the food analogy: no, Im not going to buy a sandwich if it has a bite on it.

Really. The only people I tend to see triggered are roasties and Normies.
Most incels just say the want a virgin and then the roaste task force goes on full on attack mode.

cleveland show is hit and miss but i'll give this a kek

Well, that's my point. Many think that there's some kind of distance between how they act and who they are, but there is no such distance, action is character.

imagine trying near 50 cereals and still being unable to settle down. dont care about the purity aspect of this metaphor but i cant believe theres anybody in the world who does this

>And if we continue with the food analogy: no, Im not going to buy a sandwich if it has a bite on it.
This analogy doesn't make sense. Having other sexual partners doesn't leave you with permanent physical damage.

Why stop at cheerios? Why not indulge yourself in all the surgery treats the world has to offer? You've already shown you have no self restraint, might as well embrace your glutinous habits.

It absolutely does. "damage" is relative but there's definitely an effect there. Your experiences are not just words, they are physically engraved in your brain.

>As a proud virgin, I have every right to only seek a relationship with a fellow virgin.
i have this same opinion but im in the military and all my chad friends think its weird that I never try to have sex and they think i get "friendzoned" by every girl i hang out with when really im not interested in non virgin girls.

Attached: HM-K5-2.jpg (1920x1240, 476K)

Sub 10 is fine, but anyone who has slept with 50+ people is just nasty. Unfortunately that means I'll never be able to settle down with any woman above 4/10.

What difference does sub 10 or 50+ make?
After the first dick, every dick after isn't special.

I don't want a woman who views sex as being the same as eating cheerios
Also men NEVER were congratulated for being promiscuous, that only happens in fucking movies

this shitpost summarized:

>STOP JUDGING ME FOR BEING A THOT
>lol ur losers tho

>no one has posted the rebuttal yet
Sad

Attached: 1444883296768.png (525x709, 371K)

And the second one

ori

Attached: 1492687313003.png (1305x947, 401K)

origoral

Attached: 1446320734996.jpg (1440x900, 181K)

How about if 48 guys came all over your cheerios first? Actually nevermind he would probably like that

>John "Dicks in my cereal are just added flavor for no added cost" Greene
>John "Dick Cereal is culturally enlightened Inshallah" Greene
>John "FDA needs to tell me how much sugar is in my cereal but not how many dicks" Greene
>John "Dick cereal tastes better if they are black" Greene
>John "I only put my dick in my cereal after a man of every other race had put his dick in" Greene
>John "Mongol dick cereal is especially nutritious" Greene
LMAO what a dumbass.

>everyone should be expected to wait
Stop calling me an incel!

>implying people's tastes can't change over time
>implying a few examples of bad behavior define 50% of the human race
>implying women should never know the taste of sugary cereals

This argument only works if you value sex the same as goddamn Cheerios and if someone unironically can think that than lmao@yourlife

Attached: 1522753058577.png (768x256, 299K)

I love the irony of you using incel.

>implying people's tastes can't change over time
Biology doesn't change, retard. Men in their 50s don't suddenly start thinking fat chicks are hot.
>implying a few examples of bad behavior define 50% of the human race
It happens way more often than it should though.
>implying women should never know the taste of sugary cereals
This is like saying you should try as many drugs as possible just to know what they're like. Why would purposely harm yourself when you gain nothing from it?

The point is that all of you are ape-brained subhumans. You claim you want to be loved as you would love your hypothetical significant other but, never failing, it all comes down to procreation. You're obsessed with the urge for it and you can't treat it like that base animal act is beneath your, again, hypothetical partner.

discord
=|+|--|515|--|+|=
.gg/Bsyufq6

Attached: 15.jpg (337x292, 32K)