STOP EATING MEAT YOU INCEL BARBARIANS!

>STOP EATING MEAT YOU INCEL BARBARIANS!

Attached: 1,w=756,q=high,c=0.bild.jpg (756x898, 49K)

anybody else wanna fuck her mouth?

H__e S_x

dilate

i would know this dude out easily

u literal pedo scum

Attached: fasd1.jpg (980x986, 110K)

14yo is already old enough and she is like 16

Kys you subhuman mutt. That whore is 16 and even 14 would be good in god blessed europe

Imagine being a radical environmentalist but still thinking it can be resolved through radical power centralization and simple rules about personal consumption.

If you don't believe the data, it's a waste of time. If you believe the data, the only solution is a cull.

Attached: WJOdqBB.jpg (500x617, 36K)

I did not know this

Attached: 1462257503347.gif (384x408, 182K)

she literally is a sperg

She should really focus her attention on China and India and the rest.

In the past 19 years the “west” + South Korea and Japan have reduced total emissions by over 20% but places like china, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, the Middle East, and Africa have pentupled their emissions.

literally legal in canada

no

She's 17 in a couple of months

this
china is literally primero when it comes to negative environmental footprint. the fucking subhuman chinks should be wiped out like the pests that they are

What? India has one of the lowest CO2 emissions per person, why would she focus on them?

Attached: 1200px-Co2_emissions_per_capita_our_world_in_data.svg.png (1200x847, 202K)

bomb it all

Attached: 1558987455884.jpg (1024x537, 131K)

Yet they’re third in total output despite being a barely industrial nation. The only reason the per capita is so low is because they have 1.3 billion+ people. Also their 20 year trend is basically a spike. China is in first place and their trend is also the same. The US is in 2nd but the US’s 20 year trend is downward sloping

Holy shit lmao BASED

Attached: 1558853068256.jpg (1280x1440, 227K)

Why is she a thing? I don't get it.

She's a globohomo pawn to convince people that the only way to save the planet is to create a council of a half dozen unelected technocrats who decide what you can and can't consume.

Back in 1999 in Seattle the left was literally rioting against greater environmental controls because they were inherently antidemocratic and just worked to hold the world in stasis. So they decided they needed better marketing to convince people they have to Sacrifice for the Planet, even though it's all just deck chairs on the Titanic.

Attached: a47ddd8bc18e0cbc9dc049ef031e7dd7.jpg (819x928, 217K)

Attached: screenshot.png (693x411, 195K)

>luxembourg

>The only reason the per capita is so low is because they have 1.3 billion+ people
No, the reason the per capita for India is so low because people there use and consume less things that need CO2.

yup, and now you know the signs watch people and find out how fucked we all are

If animals aren't meant to be eaten, why are they made of food?

>I can’t have sex with women so I prey on young girls
The state of you fucking parasites

It seems the premise is beyond you. Sorry to have wasted your time.

>t. Fucks disgusting leftovers while i fuck virgins
Stay mad you subhuman beta

Yeah, because they're dirt poor, user.

>this map implying consumers are responsible for the bulk of carbon pollution and not industries

>It seems the premise is beyond you.
In what way? As you already said yourself they are barely industrialized, they don't really produce anything, which means most of India's CO2 emissions come from the population and most of their population don't consume and use things that require a lot of CO2. For example 1/3 of the population doesn't eat meat, rest of the populations meat consumption is very low, there are ~50 cars per 1000 people compared to Americas 811 cars per 1000 people etc.

make me? idk if you impossible to eat animals ill just eat people

Nice samefagging you degenerate ape. God have mercy on your dyel scum soul.

Attached: 1560957748538.jpg (428x386, 16K)

Relax, she's like 19 months younger than me.

Attached: STOP EATING MEAT YOU INCEL BARBARIANS! - Fitness - 4chan.png (557x168, 27K)

>ignores that at the current rate India will surpass US total emissions output in a decade. What about the next decade?

Let’s not beat around the bush here. India could industrialize pretty greenly, but they won’t. They’ll be China 2.0... wrecking the world for a shot at super power status.

Neck yourself you subhuman mutt who never got to taste 14-16 year old virgin pussy. Go shoot up a school or something.

Attached: 20190818_040543.jpg (1071x618, 210K)

>Jow Forums - Fitness

This bitch looks like an oblivion NPC. Also Eat a balanced Diet, stop being niggers hoping from one fad to the next.

>taking posts in a shitposting thread 100% serious
congratulations retard

Attached: 1563788178405.jpg (800x512, 209K)

I've seen some people saying that red meat diets are subpar, does it proceed?
I wanted to be a MUSCULAR machoman who eats mostly red meat

uhhh

shutup whore, go deal with the fucking shitskins in your country and stop bothering me

I am so sick of seeing this fucking kid, couldn't they have at least picked a prettier puppet?

Should autists like her be sent to mental asylums?

Why are we letting the inmates run the system?

Because
> The majority of historic emissions have come from the West. China (and others) are currently emitting shit tons in an attempt to rapidly develop/catch up and because a lot of it is simply the production we shifted over there.
> We’re the richer/more influential nations, if it wasn’t for us do you think that the world would have banned Ozone depleting substances?
> We can afford the more expensive prototypes (before cheaper mass production) and can invest more in how to do things differently.
One of the biggest drivers of growing meat consumption (and the related emissions) is this perception that it’s how “rich westerners” eat. We need to either drop the meat entirely or go lab grown before every chinaman wants to eat steak 6 times a week.

Lol

40% of ocean plastic are fishing nets
95% of ocean pollution comes from five rivers in Inda, China and Africa

Making Westerners feel guilty about their timid lifestyle makes:
a) Westerners hate Climate change activists
b) The real culprits get away scot free

Instead of telling us to stop eating meat, tell the Asians to stop eating fish. If they don't stop dumping waste in rivers, tariff the shit out of them.
This is not rocket science.

And if you care about what a 16-year old autistic child has to say, you're never going to make it.
Her parents should be in jail for making her skip school.

Attached: climate change.png (601x459, 39K)

I agree, but we need to get our own houses in order before we can fully criticise.

BASED corporate knob gobbler

>before we can fully criticise

hell to the fuck no, we obviously need to put the kibosh on the biggest perpetrators first and foremost, this shit is irreversable

obviously being conscious of the effect you can have on the environment it'd be foolish not to reduce your negative impact on the earth but don't let megacorporations cuck you out of criticising them

this post is the opposite of that, cuck

“Rich Westerners want us to stop eating fish when the biggest carbon emissions/environmental harms are from the cattle they’re addicted to and are doing nothing about”

That will go down well user.

We need to focus on the big problems first.

Feeling guilty about our normal lives results in insane ideas like California's plastic straw ban. Plastic straws are not even part of the problem. Their existence doesn't even register.

Instead, Californians are now talking about how shit all their drinks have become, how paper straws distort taste, how they turn into mush after 5 minutes.

Instead of focusing on the Chinese overfishing problem, California simply turned a whole bunch of people against climate change activism.

>take sailing boat across Atlantic instead of flying as enviromentally friendly example
>all the experts reguired for this makes atleast 5 cross continenetal flights to you anyway making the whole point moot
lmao

Or we could come at it from two angles. Put pressure on the big harms from the likes of China and focus on the small stuff here (kinda like the broken windows theory).

Giving ourselves a free pass because of “muh China” is a ridiculous cop opt, and no one ever decided to do a 180 and say “fuck the environment” because paper straws aren’t up to scratch.

> “Worlds richest and fattest nation with largest carbon footprint tells the poor and developing world to stop eating so much, may consider changing own habits after”

Pollution is far more important than Co2 emissions.
It's not even a valid comparison. We're not even sure elevated Co2 levels will be bad for us. Historically high temperatures have resulted in golden ages.

that goes hand in hand with what that user is saying though

She won't. The global warming lobby is all about exploiting and shaming western governments into buying their green energy solutions and taxing the people of the west even more

It's a bit like feminism.
It's easy to dunk on irrelevant Western habits (microagressions) that to focus on actual feminist issues in the Middle East and Africa.

I'm from Luxembourg and believe me the lack of efficient public tranport coupled with the fact that the majority of citizen
live on land leads to everyone only relying on their cars for mobility. We also have one of europes most expensive cab services.

Luxembourg is about the size of a medium Chinese village. Not even a city.
You could all be driving all day every day and it wouldn't make any difference whatsoever.
You're irrelevant compared to the world.

If you look for the signs you see them all the time in pics of leftist activists.
I believe one of the things that happens when you have FAS is your frontal lobe gets fucked and you can't control your emotions properly.
That's probably a big part of this "triggered" shit.
They aren't (always) lying: giving them epic facts and logic is like showing goatse to a small child, or something.

There is consistent consensus that increase in global temperature would be catastrophic.

Everyone needs to change, and we need to do it now.

>pedo!
Actually this is a relevant thing with her. This girl is sixteen years old but if you look at her presentation she looks younger.
It might be the mental damage but I think they deliberately give her slightly messy hair and play up her neoteny so she can do this
>omg from the mouths of babes
>so pure
thing. eg. In a speech she used the words "we children."
You ever met a 16 year old girl that thought of herself as a child? They don't. And if they do public appearances they want to do their hair and make-up and look older, not younger.
Once she starts to look legal and/or starts dyeing her hair purple I think the leftists will retire her.

Loooool typical deflection

oh certainly

there is also some process of counseling what she says before relegating it to the media

same thing as David Hogg (who is now selling shows in Vegas) and that bald chick, there's a market for it

Says the western male

I heard Hogg got shit grades that didn't qualify him to get into any good college and people (were they even real?) made fun of him so Harvard accepted him because >muh nazis.

B-B-B-But China

Attached: 4D0BE0C6-5924-44B7-BC44-AB1A944579FB.png (1005x930, 86K)

>spend all the money and raising taxes to sort your own shit out
>all the while the other countries that are much bigger problems reign free and get worse and worse
>they reach a point of irreversibility but because you got your house in order you become a glowing example and get further taxed and cucked into environmental bullshit
no, there is no such thing as hypocrisy in calling out these corporations for their damages, you tackle the big shit first before it destroys you

Correct, but our government still makes a big deal out of it, what a joke.
>You're irrelevant compared to the world.
And that's a good thing.

If climate change is important to you: you do not lift.

See: The West is the big shit, and we can afford to change more easily.

Attached: E478EE4F-B101-4200-883D-34CE884C3D2C.png (528x1025, 159K)

What is even your point?

The UN recently asked ships to report Co2 emissions and they accidentally claimed three ships produced millions of tons of Co2, equivalent to thousands of other ships combined.

The UN just accepted the numbers as they were, it took a while for them to even realize the numbers were wrong.

The UN IPCC is a discredited organization that has been caught falsifying data in the past. If you believe anything they say, you're anti-science.

Jow Forums is leaving again

>comparing per capita of countries with populations ranging from 20 million to 1.3 billion
Surely you cant be this retarded,
16.5 times 325 million is still less than 7.5 times 1.388 billion, infact by this per capita measurement China is almost double USA's CO2 emissions but no muh per capita ebil western consumption extreme overpopulation has nothing to do with climate change bro 1.3 billion indians and rising is fine bro stop having kids whitey

Attached: brainlettttt.jpg (800x450, 44K)

Que?

University of MIT has already proven even all coutnries within the green new deal were to cooperate 100% and meet their targets completely they would only lower the end result by 0.1-0.2 of a degree by 2050

>flying a 5 person crew from US to Europe and using a yacht sponsored by BMW to avoid taking up a seat in a flight that will fly anyway
When will the nonsense stop? Are we ready for the fire?

Their plan isn't ever to let us be satisfied we are doing our bit. They want white people to feel guilty permanently. The next step of the plan is they just call immigration from shit countries "climate refugees" and pretend they want to live in our countries because we ruined theirs with our emissions.
They want to build Judge Dredd-style mega cities in the Anglosphere and get people from the worst countries to migrate into them because it's easier than building infrastructure in the worst countries.
Then the whole world can be living in shoe boxes and collecting pop dolls.

You cannot be against nuclear power and call yourself a climate activist.
There is no scenario under which emissions are reduced without switching to nuclear.
To put it simply, without nuclear we're never going to make it.

Attached: 1561309001079.jpg (272x274, 26K)

>we can afford to save the planet but cant even afford to keep our citizens alive and healthy
>we can afford to give all these shithole countries billions in aid but we cant afford to keep our citizens alive and healthy
>we can afford to spend billions on defense so that europeans can live in socialism but we cant even afford to keep our citizens alive and healthy
Imagine being an American holy shit talk about mismanagement of money

Attached: burgertiem.jpg (559x556, 35K)

what do you do with nuclear waste eh?

Easier to contain than billions of tons of greenhouse gases.