Why does Dr. Nowzaradan tell people to not eat carbs?

Why does Dr. Nowzaradan tell people to not eat carbs?

Doesn't he know it's only calories that matter?

Attached: cico.jpg (1024x1728, 414K)

Other urls found in this thread:

idmprogram.com/evidence-caloric-restriction/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29170160
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121962/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27059106
bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k4583
youtube.com/watch?v=qVbF68WqxGM
twitter.com/AnonBabble

hes a ketard shaking my baka head 2 b quite desu honest

Calories aren't all that matter. Fat eaten cannot be converted to fat within the body. It's a physical impossibility.

FAt eTen cannot bd konwertit po phAt

it's because he puts them on 1200 cal diet where protein is more important
a few pieces of meat and veggie sides use up a big part of the allotment, so just throwing random carbs in kinda fucks everything up.

He must be sponsored by the ultra powerful grass fed beef farmers.

Poor little guys like Coca-Cola corporation don't have the resources to fight back against this scary far-right ketonazi propaganda.

Carb addict fat brains need to be trained to eat more protein and shit with vitamins and minerals in it.

He doesn't tell them to cut fat though. Why?

Someone should send him to school so he can learn that a calorie is a calorie.

Also why emphasize protein? It's just calories.

He knows that the more fat you eat the more fat you lose. Fat acts as a magnet and "pulls out" other fat from the body's fat stores. By contrast, carbs act as a lock on fat stores and make it impossible to lose fat. Fat is also smaller than carbs and he understands that obesity is caused by eating large volume of food, not calories. Damn it feels good to be redpilled

Umm...Yeah... You ok mate?

That's not what I learned by watching Coca-Cola commercials during football games.

I'm pretty sure a calorie is a calorie. Broccoli and soda are no different.

Attached: 1552544014126.gif (450x338, 37K)

false flag

people are going to want salad dressing and cooking oil and not have to eat skinless chicken breast every meal.
just practically speaking, a high carb 1200 cal diet wouldn't be structured very well.

I assume he puts them on a low/no carb diet because I’m sure they’re all diabetic or at least insulin resistant

>Also why emphasize protein?
because high quality protein is way more nutritious. you'll live a hell of a lot long on protein water than sugar water, for instance. so very low cal diets are way easier when shifted toward protein. of if that sounds wrong, just look at what womens fitness competitors have to eat on their diets.

Don't you guys understand what people like this would do with a free reign 1200 Cal diet?
>omg i drank 1200 Cal of soda and I'M STILL HUNGRY
>this doctor is dumb i am going to McDonalds I'll try again tomorrow

>protein is way more nutritious
Uh, they have the same nutrition sweetie.

1 calorie of protein == 1 calorie of carb

See? Identical.

So you made this thread just to low key shit on CICO huh? Imagine being this pathetic that this is how you spend your days.

He keeps them off carbs because carbs fuck with insulin responses and for people this big insulin is fucked and their weight loss will be slowed with carbs, not halted slowed.

If you don't believe CICO works I suggest you don't eat or drink anything for two weeks and see for yourself.

Or how about we just look at the scientific evidence? Not a single RCT shows caloric restriction working.

>The TODAY study was a study of diabetics using medication (metformin) with or without lifestyle changes. This was primarily the calorie-deficit approach so beloved by academic physicians. The main study showed that this CRaP method produced no clinical benefits in diabetes management. What about weight loss?

>Let’s see. At the beginning of the study, the average Body Mass Index of the lifestyle group was 34. After 5 years of dietary counselling to reduce calories, the average BMI was…….. 34. Nice job, guys. Glad you spent the last 5 years of your life counting calories?
idmprogram.com/evidence-caloric-restriction/

Attached: CRaP1.jpg (581x505, 50K)

Just saying a thing does not work makes you a gay faggot. Tell us what does work.

Lowering insulin.

How you want to lower insulin is up to you. Fast, keto, both. You can even do a whole foods plant diet. Avoid refined carbs and stick to high fibre slow-digesting carbs with no snacking.

2 shekels have been deposited in your account. 2 links left to spam today!

How do you have a BMI under 25 and be 40% bf.

Constant grazing on carbs.

It makes your body unable to use fat for energy, so when your glucose runs out you start burning muscle.

>%visceral abdominal fat
typical old guys with guts and dried up arms and legs

Attached: 07bd869e4da88356fa06ec8590f42e3c.jpg (298x448, 12K)

The colloquial beer belly. Or perhaps a fructose gut.

If I was a doctor I'd wore this cunts jaw shit and force her to fast for a month before even thinking about putting her on a diet of anything.

same thing applies to all diets. carbs are literally fucking irrelevant

for clinically obese patients all dietary interventions and clinically inefficient in the long term because their new set point + whatever made them overeat in the first place just makes them overeat again

>hurf durf insulin magic
go fuck yourself

Wrong. Keto is proven to:

- burn more calories
- reduce hunger
- preserve muscle mass

Attached: ketooo.jpg (800x1587, 180K)

>It makes your body unable to use fat for energy, so when your glucose runs out you start burning muscle.

when your glucose runs out you start burning fat*

the retention of muscle depends on how much protein synthesis is going on in comparison to muscle breakdown. this depends on rest, protein intake, training, and the size of the deficit which affects protein synthesis negatively

>hurr durr carbs are bad
go fuck yourself

the only one of those that are true is reduce hunger, sorry

and that's just because it's restrictive as balls

try cutting on 1800 calories of lentils, rice and broccoli a day and see if you're satiated

>herp derp keto has magic effects
go fuck yourself

>1800 calories is cutting

A sedentary person can survive comfortably on half that.

Keto burns more calories through mitochondrial uncoupling (the same way that DNP increases energy use):
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29170160
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121962/

Keto preserves muscle better than other diets:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27059106

Stay mad, vegan.

Attached: 1544975693432.jpg (218x231, 9K)

>1800 isn't a deficit
found your problem and it's not that you're eating carbs

>zero ecological validity
lmao okay

>when your glucose runs out you start burning fat AND protein*

Attached: Amino_acid_catabolism.png (906x636, 114K)

also
>RAT MODELS
>keto and body comp
>doesn't control for protein intake
LMAO'ing at your life

>posting links to studies whose content is neither useful, valid or relevant to pretend you know what you're talking about
died right there

And here's a diet study showing people burn up to 500 calories per day more on keto, depending on insulin secretion.

We know the mechanism (mitochondrial uncoupling) and we know the amount (200-500 calories per day).

The science is indisputable at this point. Keto has an enormous metabolic advantage.

bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k4583

Attached: mpv-shot0010.jpg (1920x1080, 216K)

as on all deficits

Nope. Keto preserves muscle mass better than other diets.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27059106

>bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k4583
>smong participants in the highest third of pre-weight loss insulin secretion, the difference between the low and high carbohydrate diet was 308 kcal/d in the intention-to-treat analysis and 478 kcal/d in the per protocol analysis

>parading the fact that fatties with pre-diabetes can't process carbohydrates as a proof that keto is in any way better than high carb for healthy people
lmao'ed'ed

>zero ecological validity
>misrepresenting studies
ayy

H-hey now..

>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27059106
>protein intake drives protein synthesis
>protein synthesis drops during a deficit
>diet with more protein minimizes drops in protein synthesis

glad we cleared that up, guess that's a green light on dropping fats out of your diet and eating more protein

Coca-Cola shill spotted. Dr Ludwig is one of the most outstanding and accomplished researchers in the world, one of the few who understands that physics is an Illuminati scam. Like most low-carbers he is also Jewish as they come, so I suspect that this poster is an antisemite just as Ancel Keys was

All groups including the lowest insulin secretion group had metabolic advantage from low carb. The relationship between carbs and calories burned was linear.

In other words, the less carbs you eat the more calories you burn.

>Total energy expenditure differed by diet in the intention-to-treat analysis (n=162, P=0.002), with a linear trend of 52 kcal/d (95% confidence interval 23 to 82) for every 10% decrease in the contribution of carbohydrate to total energy intake (1 kcal=4.18 kJ=0.00418 MJ).
bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k4583

Attached: 1545703619633.jpg (191x180, 21K)

Why does weight stall while on keto?

>le nazi larp
see a therapist

>In other words, the less carbs you eat the more calories you burn.
nope

>Resting energy expenditure, total physical activity, and moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity were marginally higher in the group assigned to the low carbohydrate diet
that's enough to call penn jilette

also, since the proposed mechanisms are through 1. keto being efficient for people who are literally metabolically broken and 2. through increased hormonal satiety, meaning that the carbs they ate would clearly affect the result, then this thing really does belong in the thrash

not to mention that their selection process is a burning pile of garbage

because it's a regular diet moderated by caloric intake

people think it's better because you drop water weight and cycle out the contents of your gut since you're eating far less mass

the stalling is just reality catching up

The mechanism is mitochondrial uncoupling.

Attached: dnp.jpg (280x280, 20K)

>the mechanism is retardation
just stop, your rat model shit-talk has no ecological validity

it's not practically relevant

This is some serious fatty cope. A calorie is a calorie. Food is comprised of more than just calories though retard.

Maybe the fat is restricting blood to his brain?

The metabolic advantage also exists in humans.

Keto simply burns more calories. This is an overwhelmingly proven fact.

I'm sorry you can't fearmonger about animal products anymore. Maybe try promoting vegan ketogenic diets instead.

This is a battle you are losing. The Seventh Day Adventist lies are crumbling. All the kings horses and all the kings men can't put it together again.

bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k4583

Attached: mpv-shot0011.jpg (1920x1080, 211K)

Insulin inhibits human growth hormone in your sleep

there is no excuse for someone trying to lose weight to have a refined carb on their plate

What, you don't want to be happy? You need carbs to be happy.

Why are you telling people not to be happy? Everyone deserves to have a bottle of pure happiness in their life.

People should be happy. Drink Coca-Cola and eat less broccoli. The calories are no different!

Attached: Open_Happiness.jpg (316x316, 8K)

Post body.

Because fat satiates better than carbs and these landwhales have no willpower to outright ignore cravings

Attached: dietcoke.jpg (254x329, 14K)

definitely a powerlifter

A power lifter I see...

Gotta bulk with carbs and put on a ton of fat mass to be strong!

Attached: lion.jpg (800x531, 79K)

according to jeff cavalier athlean x dot com, carb-heavy foods are bad because they don't sate your hunger like protein does so you end up eating more calories than you need

She needs to not eat for a few weeks

She needs to not eat for >365 days. Definitely has more fat to burn than Angus Barbieri.

Probably could go a full two years.

what? are you drunk?

He's a roided up broscientist, who cares

Attached: 37765924.png (500x300, 42K)

It's the other way lol, you have to eat insane amount of carbs to get fat. To make your body make fat from carbs. But for some people 0 carbs works fine too. Idk man. Depends on the person.

He's a very angry vegan (aren't they all?). Shitposting is his brilliant idea to push people towards veganism, since all the latest science and data have obliterated vegan talking points.

But most vegans are anti-fat not anti-carb.

>Depends on the person.
This point alone could and should end this entire thread.

Right. He got so dominated in every argument he got in he's been reduced to making false-flag shitposts.

I thought it was transparently obvious what he is doing, but apparently this board attracts a lot of morons who keep replying to him like he's being serious.

Because these people are completely clueless about nutrition and have never eaten clean a day in their lives
keto is for retards, so it's perfect

Poe's Law is absolutely at play here. People that stupid post on Jow Forums all the time.

What's the diet for geniuses?

anything with more than a single criterion

Protein is more satiating.
It's also super easy to go over your target with carbs since they are cheap and plentiful.

the only one of those that are true is reduce hunger, sorry

and that's just because it's restrictive as balls

try cutting on 1800 calories of lentils, rice and broccoli a day and see if you're satiated

What point were they thing to make here, bros?

>Thinking anyone is going to listen to you after this

Shoo, shoo!

Learn science, dumbass.

All calories are the same no matter where they come from.

youtube.com/watch?v=qVbF68WqxGM

there's this revolutionary new invention
it's called pen and paper

>far-right ketonazi
based and fashpilled. White men are not designed to eat carbohebrews.

Congrats user, you've ascended biology and nutrition.

Attached: universitybroscience.png (941x723, 118K)

This thread is great proof that nobody should get their fitness advice from mongolian knitting forums