KPOP GENERAL

Silly edition

Attached: 1484257592605.jpg (1920x1080, 134K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=C3upS02s23g
youtube.com/watch?v=Xe8g1T4M5l8
youtube.com/watch?v=hvfvGyYhtMQ
youtube.com/watch?v=NRKxH0VVywk
youtube.com/watch?v=VYnMeSPfgnA
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veil_of_ignorance
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Silly indeed

Attached: 5e1e29dc36830a808ccb2bd35d9c8bdb1c1172.jpg (2048x1152, 254K)

thread edition

Attached: 1493747719382.jpg (1500x1000, 1016K)

Attached: hyelin.webm (1280x720, 1.92M)

doh

Attached: binnie neck.jpg (1620x2160, 576K)

From the thumbnail, I thought it would be the apple webm.

Attached: Solji Feeds Hyelin.webm (500x560, 1.69M)

Attached: 1521420719346.jpg (2000x1331, 696K)

dead general

I'm converting heathens.

I have nothing to say, so I'm waiting for others to post so I can reply

Attached: 1527208474709.jpg (1000x1500, 903K)

hyelin x binnie collab would be so cool they're much alike
youtube.com/watch?v=C3upS02s23g

why

Why what?

Attached: 1524774151850.jpg (618x1024, 83K)

Jesus fuck.
youtube.com/watch?v=Xe8g1T4M5l8

Every time I think I've seen peak Jennie, she just tops it somehow.

Attached: ixpta24y0lmz.jpg (768x768, 93K)

why nothing to say?

maybe he has nothing to say to rv haters

Attached: 1492932557930.jpg (1000x1500, 1.02M)

I don't have anything to say that you would find interesting imo

Here's an information about the situation here right now:

There's a shortage of fuel available for vehicles (including airplanes, police cars and ambulances), there's even a shortage of food (including in hospitals).

Attached: Dd9i-OKUQAI6BQJ.jpg (800x1200, 167K)

Oh my god.
youtube.com/watch?v=hvfvGyYhtMQ

Attached: Jisoo (1).png (434x675, 262K)

Did she forget her lines again? lmao

ordem e progresso?

reverse teaser again

Attached: DeDP6KDVAAcmuiR.jpg (1200x857, 187K)

That's pretty bad

Sounds bad. Get out of that country.

Attached: DeCyL--VAAAjDmb.jpg orig.jpg (575x767, 87K)

It's all because of some stupid truckers' protest, they are blocking the roads

ye ik
are you happy for them?

No they are dumb and fucking this country even more, the gov is already bankrupt

o then what's going to happen?

Federal government already reduced one tax (which will only reduce the price by 5 cents) and Petrobras will reduce fuel price, working on a loss (Government will pay for the difference to not increase the company's debt)

that's good

is this silly?

Attached: 6c979a38cb2ea058f1714fbb1b728f29.jpg (1280x1280, 321K)

Trump fucking with Iran affected fuel prices here too
last week I've seen gas costing 5+PLN for a littler for the first time in few years maybe ever

Yeah

Attached: 1511000254641.jpg (1024x684, 107K)

nice

Attached: 73c7d288fbb7d5e6843fb6d2ed961980.jpg (1000x1499, 201K)

>that's good
That's not actually good, the federal is already short on money and now things will get even worse. And the most important reform didn't happen too.

All of this is just because this is elections year, so no one wants to do the necessary reforms

>the federal
Government*

How long until the election? We're a week away.

yeah but no more strike at least

>All of this is just because this is elections year, so no one wants to do the necessary reforms
that;s why democracy sucks

5 months, no reforms will happen this year because of this. More drastic (and unpopular) measures will have to happen next year because of this

Some are still blocking the roads

Mo.
Good edition.

Attached: CwMHKuOUkAANOZl.jpg (497x332, 29K)

good preview thumbnail

mo

Good post

Attached: 2 - fpyCIUu.jpg (1200x800, 97K)

Mo~

Attached: 1524824684652.jpg (1000x1500, 166K)

Whoops.

Attached: 1523569559423.jpg (1199x1800, 238K)

do you donate blood?

steam privacy policy update

To whom?

Attached: 1525124958728.webm (800x450, 1.17M)

you know random people
you just donate it and they decide who gets it

Never did that

same

and today I argued about it with my friend who does it pretty often so now I'm curious about your opinion

Doesn't seem like something you could really argue over. It's a pretty good thing to do.

Attached: 1499011555761.jpg (1535x857, 78K)

>It's a pretty good thing to do.
I disagree

I've done it before but that was a long time ago.
Lmao.

Why?

few reasons
1. people who donate blood do it to feel better about themselves not to help people

2. imo ratio of good people to bad people is like 20/80 so when you donate blood there's 80% chance that you will save someone not worth saving

3. I want to create pressure on researchers working on synthetic blood, the less natural blood we have to more money will go on those research

Attached: c729d4d2b671d32073ee1121867e080a.jpg (854x1280, 162K)

A bit silly dbh.

Attached: unknown (1).png (382x454, 296K)

so how is it good?

what a tosser

Attached: 103.jpg (800x1200, 151K)

Because it helps people in dire need of a blood transfusion.

Attached: 1482855537467.jpg (1920x1281, 1.79M)

what if you save Hitler 2.0?
is that good?

I don't even know what that means

shut the fuck up and bleed out on the asphalt

Attached: 40.jpg (800x1200, 254K)

Hitler was just a guy. He didn't do ww2 on his own.

you know what I mean

my question here is:
is saving a bad person a good thing?

imo it's not

another question:
what's the good people to bad people ratio?

>is saving a bad person a good thing?
Yes

t. christcuck

Attached: 2M7Vy.jpg (900x900, 131K)

Define good and bad first.
And then outline the criteria for defining a person as good or bad.
Then you can bring ratios into it.

you argue like Jordan Peterson

when I define good and bad you will ask me to define something else because you just don't want to answer the question

I'm an atheist though

Attached: 1520205089542.jpg (2048x2048, 965K)

so explain why you think that saving bad person is a good thing?

You should ask yourself whether you would be grateful if you were given a blood transfusion if you needed one.

Is it beat down! time!?

Attached: 1498231723875.gif (200x174, 643K)

not an argument

Eh?

it's just not
it's like when I said that aborting cripples is good you would say "imagine if your kid was a cripple"

Ridiculous.
I'm literally just asking you to specify and use well defined terms OR define the vague terms you're already using so we can get on the same page.
Not that it matters. I'd rather accidentally save a "bad" person than deliberately condemn a whole crowd of "good" people.

Attached: 30930134_161663084674329_4515128157111582720_n.jpg (900x900, 52K)

People don't have access to complete information to decide who is and who isn't a good person

brazilian had no problem with answering that question
you can just use your definition of good and bad person like you did here

>I'd rather accidentally save a "bad" person than deliberately condemn a whole crowd of "good" people.
and that's an answer
so why bother with "define X" shit?

that's why you have to work on statistics

Because now all we have is an illusion of consensus.
Since nothing has been specified I might as well have said green and red person.
A slightly extreme example but then again we are arguing moral absolutes so reason has already been thrown to the wind.

youtube.com/watch?v=NRKxH0VVywk

I don't think that's identical. Aborting the physically or mentally crippled can be justified as preventing further suffering.
I'm sure you would appreciate someone donating blood to you.

>that's why you have to work on statistics
Saving people ins't a simple arithmetic though. Just because you're letting 8 bad people die while only letting 2 good people die does not mean that this is necessarily better than save all of these people. You have to compare how much good those 2 people would have brought to the world compared to the bad those 8 other would bring.

It's not something so simple, you seem to think it is.

What?

youtube.com/watch?v=VYnMeSPfgnA

>Since nothing has been specified I might as well have said green and red person.
whatever dude
so when I ask you about ice cream you will demand definition of an ice cream?
give me a break

yes I would but that's not the question here

>Saving people ins't a simple arithmetic though
eh?

wtf JYP?
dancing to girl group choreos is pretty gay

Also, you seem to work exclusively on an Utilitarian mindset. Morality is not an objective truth

>eh?
Read nigga read:
You have to compare how much good those 2 people would have brought to the world compared to the bad those 8 other would bring.

Just because there are more "bad" people, does not mean it's not worthy trying to save the "good" ones. It's not just "8 > 2"

Attached: 1520858337141.jpg (1000x1500, 481K)

Yeah, man. "Ice cream" is totally as vague a concept as good and evil.
How was your conference?

Attached: 1526354705946.jpg (1920x1280, 260K)

It is, I asked you.

Attached: eagledubu1.jpg (1830x926, 1018K)

I mean that with a little good will you would answer it without those define "good" questions

I would be grateful so what?

yeah I've read your post and it's a very good argument

Good will? Ironic given the argument and your position on it.

great, held my presentation and left
didn't stay to see the others or for the banquet lol

Attached: 180210_10.jpg (1200x1800, 236K)

You should check the social credit system China is implementing, if you didn't already

>I would be grateful so what?
His argument is the veil of ignorance thought experiment, check this:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veil_of_ignorance

>Skipping out on free food and drinks

Attached: e5sys5u.gif (259x277, 1.88M)

>having to spend 9 hours there
>free

Attached: 180210_08.jpg (1200x1800, 404K)

you know what's ironic? that you all say that it's a good thing but non of you does it


>You should check the social credit system China is implementing, if you didn't already
yeah I've heard about it

i've donated blood quite a few times. there were blood drives in my uni and every time they gave you a little bag of goodies. that's why i did it.
they gave you
>a chocolate bar
>a couple of candy bars
>a couple of cans of spam/fish
>a bottle of coke
>a bag of nuts
i mainly did it for the goodies.

that said, people itt are experts at poking holes and mocking any moral stance you might have without actually comitting to a position themselves. completely worthless in an argument, so you should just not bother with it. their highest moral position is disinterest and they despise anybody who cares about anything.

So you would accept it? But you oppose blood donation?

A nine hour banquet? Omo

no dumbo the conference was 9 hours

Just come back later.
I've already said I've done it.
But that's not an argument anyway, since you're keeping score.

>so you should just not bother with it
I've seen few good arguments here today tho?

>So you would accept it? But you oppose blood donation?
I think that death penalty is good but I wouldn't want to be killed for murdering someone