Your waifu is not real. It does not do to dwell on dreams, user, and forget to live

Your waifu is not real. It does not do to dwell on dreams, user, and forget to live.

Attached: nonnon.jpg (1920x1080, 692K)

fake news

You're not real.

Attached: SWeden.png (460x464, 16K)

Im dead inside

facts facts facts

Have you seen my waifu?

Attached: 7E8D4D35-577D-46D3-87AE-711288D7863D.png (1075x1692, 477K)

Schrodingers cat.
We can't know if our waifus are real or not.

Attached: 1500838297489.gif (300x367, 162K)

existing as an idealize concept is still completely valid

Attached: Screenshot_11.png (576x438, 533K)

>It does not do to dwell on dreams, user, and forget to live.
wat

debate me nerds. even the wise ancient greeks understood waifuism as a concept

Attached: ff995d958fa72decb1e205d77625cb0b413f96d4_00.jpg (261x168, 11K)

Fine.
What would a waifu gain from the property of existence?

Attached: diogenese.jpg (1024x752, 190K)

oh man not that faggot

also i'd say the same reason words like 'happiness' exist. it's describing an ideal that is understood even if you can't poke it with a stick.

>reason words exist
Alright if you're going to use the limits of language then. Suppose that existence is a property of the designation of the subject term in a singular existential sentence. Then ‘Ronald McDonnald does not exist’ predicates nonexistence of the designation of the subject term, in which case reality includes an entity—the designation of the singular term and subject of predication—that has the property of not existing.
So, we should reject the claim that existence is a property of the designation of subject terms in existential sentences?

Attached: 1522705880989.jpg (494x489, 26K)

i'm just saying 'a god of horses exists'. and as such a 'god of waifus exists'. its obviously a personal thing.

maybe calling it a crush makes more sense.

Attached: img_5.png (960x543, 410K)

>can't hold a philosophical conversation after they beg for it

Attached: leave.png (850x780, 714K)

nigga are u dumb?

Attached: 1412621570582.jpg (280x280, 12K)

well you want to know if it matters to me if they actually physically exist or not and the answer is no

Attached: BstVP.png (1600x1200, 205K)

Are you?
Without interfering with the experiment using monitoring equipment how can you know for certain if the box still contains the cat or that the cat exists within the box at all?
You can't. It's a thought experiment.
The Jow Forums equivalent would be.
I put my wife chino in a box. Is she still there?
We don't know. Prove me wrong. Pro tip: you can't.

Attached: 1501233313884.jpg (385x375, 35K)

Wait a wiafu can be proven through first principal axiology

Attached: 220px-JohnDunsScotus_-_full.jpg (220x336, 23K)

>physically
>exist
You're using two properties for different things. It doesn't matter if they "exist" or not as "existence" is an abstract concept that requires the foreknowledge of other properties of the item/idea/concept.
Here's a simple question.
What would the difference be between a cute waifu and a cute EXISTING waifu?

Attached: original (1).gif (393x274, 717K)