How come incels are more intellectual than Chad...

How come incels are more intellectual than Chad? Don't say it's a cope because incels often have entire bookcases in their home filled with the same books the public intellectuals like Chomsky read. Also sometimes if you read incel forums and even r9k from time to time you can see incels and indeed robots having good in depth discussions about history, psychology, philosophy, religion, etc whereas the Chads on Insta and FB post boring mundane normie shit about netflix and parties and alcohol.

I am not an incel myself but i find convos and interactions with them to be more engaging and interesting, like i can chat to an incel about why i disagree with Milton Friedman's economics and the incel will be able to give a fruitful discourse while the chad doesn't even know where to begin and just wants to hang with his bros and scroll through his phone instead.

Attached: 1408314040061.jpg (800x800, 126K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ineedhelp.home.blog/2018/10/02/thinking-about-thinking-about-things/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

A true Chad is an intellectual, you mean Brads.

>incels read things that Chomsky reads
>incel also posts a antisemitic cartoon

Attached: 1464834104450.jpg (1000x721, 229K)

This. Chads are smart and hot

because when you come to the conclusion that you really can't do much with your body, you start to train the mind, legit being able to keep conversations interesting and going for a while can make up for your lack of atractiveness unless you go for stacies

the left can't meme back to your containtment board filthy commie

Calum Von Moger is not an intellectual and he's universally accepted to be a Chad. Same with Jeff Seid.

>he's mentally healthy enough to keep conversations interesting and going for a while
yikes

this is why you are supposed to read you fuck, to get better at talking, to have something to talk about and to be able to form your own arguments, unless you have a legit learning disability you have no excuse for not reading

yikes look at how angry this weirdo is getting
i've read plenty of books in my life, doesn't mean i'm good at human-to-human conversation

i doubt you are either

Jow Forums is for righties retard

Jow Forums is also for anything related to politics while Jow Forums is not, keep Jow Forums in Jow Forums

>MUH FREE SPEECH YOU ARE CENSORING MY FASCIST OPINONS
>We need to ban degeneracy such as homosexuality and feminism
High IQ position

Attached: fuck whites.jpg (857x801, 100K)

The OP is related to politics you absolutely mad lad

I think you already have an answer in mind, from the way your worded this and the image you used, but I just want to say that having read a bunch of books written in difficult language and talking about other people's ideas in a very superficial way doesn't imply intelligence. That is, mental capability.
I've noticied that a lot of people think that being more interested by politics or philosophy or art or whatever means you're more intelligent.
It's just not true, you're more thoughtful sure and that's valuable and makes you more enjoyable to talk to, but there are absolute fucking mouthbreathing morons who'd love to share their thoughts on psychology and history with you, and plenty of people who are very accomplished thanks to their mind who are just not interested.
Intelligence is measured by IQ, but you wouldn't be able to tell with an IQ test which person is more likely to want to chat with you about fucking metaphysics. Look at this site, it's filled with the most interesting idiots on the planet, and I include myself in there.

I wrote a whole post about this on my blog btw, if anyone wants to read.. ineedhelp.home.blog/2018/10/02/thinking-about-thinking-about-things/

>incels and chads are politics
I think Jow Forums unironically ruined you

>Chomsky
>antisemitic picture
>Milton Friedman
You're projecting so hard it's pathetic.

Attached: 1498675930313.jpg (890x876, 150K)

>bringing some things that are somehow related to politics up in a topic that is by no means politics automatically makes it politics
maybe you have to read the op one more time, both chomsky and friedman were used as simple examples and probably the pic wasn't intentional, then again, you are so far gone that even if op used fucking diogenes as an example you would still find a way to turn this into politics, keep Jow Forums in Jow Forums you delusional fuck

You need to learn to embrace the chaotic nature of reality, user. Chaos is infinite possibility. We're a small subset of that possibility.
It's impossible for us to know what lead to people's lives. It's impossible for us to know if they aren't some kind of aberration in a simulation, "NPCs", or something similar. Our brain could be generating all we see, and we'd have no way of testing this with 100% certainty.
It's better to embrace the fact we can't know, and focus on what we want to manifest out of the infinite possibilities.
Remember that you MUST be more creative the more limited you are. Without any limitations what would you even create, and for what purpose?

Attached: 1065970_screenshots_20190608004117_1.jpg (1920x1080, 373K)

Homosexuality is alright but only for guys
Dykes shouls be put in breeding camps

Goddamn, look at you seething

Attached: 1558505519511.png (944x538, 518K)

yes, ad hominem and an unrelated pic, the best argument there is
dilate and kys

Bookmarked your faggy blog, dude. Keep it up.

>normalfag tries fitting in by posting his wittle may may
lol

We're not smarter than Chads. All this interest in philosophy and science and shit is just another cope for not getting pussy. I never would have gotten into any of this stuff if I was getting laid regularly from a normal age. Stop deluding yourself.

Attached: schope.jpg (557x615, 76K)

Silly goose, calm down. My pictures are purely accidental. Why aren't you responding to the actual substance of my original post?
Who tries to fit in on an anonymous imageboard?

Attached: c5cpxda4hj131.jpg (640x805, 81K)

literal subhuman iq, you are a disgrace to your race for making that post

The amount of tolerable incels, Chads, normies and foids are near zero in reality.

Attached: Roastie Uprising.png (256x224, 5K)

Get off of the board. You're clearly low IQ and don't understand how memes work.

>I think what I'm trying to say is that the NPC thing is a really tempting way to look at the world and it helps a lot to cope with the fact that so often everyone around you can appear totally soulless, but you should be careful because maybe they're right and you're just a faggot thinking about pointless shit while everyone else is busy getting laid and doing fun shit.
Insightful words from the robautustic branch of philosophy.

>incels often have entire bookcases in their home filled
Not even remotely true. Incels maybe have a bookshelf filled with vidya or old VHS tapes or even manga in some cases. But overall they arent particularly intellectual. Thats not to say they dont think deeply about certain topics. Its just that its always in regards to consumption.
>How can I get X
>If I had been born with Y I could easily get X
Very rarely do incels approach their first impression of reality from the angle of trying to disprove it. This makes most of their opinions surface level, and ultimately leads to them being consumptive because
>why contribute to something thats so surface level if Im not even as happy as I assume everyone else is

What is thinking about things a sign of? I think you're right about how people are tempted to think of others as NPCs because they don't think, and that maybe thinking about things is actually a waste of time, but it makes me think, ironically, about why some people are like this in the first place. Why do we think about trivial things? Why don't the 'NPCs' as some call them think about these things? Did they consciously think about this and then make the decision not to think about 'trivial' things and to do other things instead? If so, why'd they make the choice while we continue to think about this stuff? If they didn't consciously think about this and make a decision, why don't they think about stuff like this? If we've established that thinking about things isn't necessarily a sign of intelligence or that a lack of thinking isn't necessarily a sign of being an 'NPC', then where does the difference come from?

>If we've established that thinking about things isn't necessarily a sign of intelligence
brainlet and npcpilled, go away subhuman

>Incels are more intellectual than Chads
>Have no problem solving skills(something normal people learn in second grade) than blaming jews and Chads

>op pic
I hate shit like this. You niggers really think anyone with an opinion that's different from yours is being controlled by jews. I understand how you can be annoyed by the feminist and the gay feller but that black guy on the end smoking weed and the white kid with the atheism book are literally hurting no one. One wants to smoke his plants in peace and the other, albeit insufferable during arguments, just wants to not believe in god. Not everything is a Jewish conspiracy.

pot and atheism are the the biggest jewish conspiracies along with big pharma lmao

>Jesus was a literal jew

Have never seen an incel capable of offering good discussion on anything, all they have is the cookie cutter edgy templates that break down whenever they encounter someone with actual knowledge of the subject or even genuine interest.
It's funny that they pride so much of being contrarians yet always end up spouting the same shit

I just think of it (thoughtfulness) as an entirely separate category from intelligence, or not entirely separate as a literal drooling retard like those spartley spooligans who can't formulate a sentence will not be capable of having much of an opinion on anything, but certainly a distinct one.
The two don't align at all, even though there may be a barrier of entry, anyone of middling/ average intelligence can be high in thoughtfulness (think of it like an RPG stat) but mediocre in intelligence and vice versa
As for the reason why, well I don't really know user. Maybe that could be the subject of another one of my blog posts
Thanks fren, I hope you find something thought provoking or resonant in there, I've been doing this for almost a year now so I've uploaded nearly 50 posts at this point about all sorts of things. A lot of bad ones admittedly, but this is just a little hobby I'm not making anything from it so I don't mind that.

If you're going off the wrong, warped definition of "Chad" that normalfags have solidified, as in a perfect demi-god, yes.
Unfortunately that's not the definition, Chad is a football jock, his mentality and psyche will reflect that accordingly.

They aren't. They think they're intellectuals and interesting because they approve of their own interests and ideologies. Some have books. This doesn't guarantee they've read them or have the capacity for critical thought and problem solving.

>Incels are always alt right edgies
>Chads are always lefties

Stop mixing this with politics just because you hate yourself.

based chadbot with seethe-inducing posts

Atheism and marijuana have literally always existed, long before Jews were a thing.

atheism was invented by jews in the 1800s to defeat the white man
look at pictures of jesus, he has blue eyes
he was an aryan male, they hate that

Since when does based translate to "makes off-topic threads and ghosts when he can't counter an argument"?

It is cope. Incels also start lifting as a means to compensate, which just makes them tryhards with patchwork personalities because intellectuals that commit to both bodybuilding and intellectualism are few and far between. And the ones that do like Nassim Taleb only lift because they can apply their own philosophy to it.

Incels are literally the least intelligent of all men.

But a religion that was invented by Jewish people about worshipping a Jewish person that tells you what to believe and how you should live your life and what morals you should have, is only followed by free-thinking people who are totally immune to Jewish tricks. Right.