Are these real?

Radiation in Hiroshima and nagasaki

Race isnt real

youtube.com/watch?v=MVvdvMDWbhQ
5:05
youtube.com/watch?v=ArES8qOgXDk

Please look up the Baby Tooth Survey, it's when scientists noticed that Strontium 90 was present in humans and that specific element is a byproduct of fission explosions. Even medical grade steel is fished out from century or older ship wrecks in order to get metal that isn't irradiated from those tests

Reminder that if you're a jesuit priest you're immune to radiation
catholicnewsagency.com/news/the-miracle-of-hiroshima-jesuits-survived-the-atomic-bomb-thanks-to-the-rosary-69261

No, it's the rosary which was made from silver and absorbed a portion of said radiation.

no

Haha I bet you 2+2 = 4 right? WRONG

2+2= 3

Dumb cunt, YOU are just regurgitating shit from YouTube. You think we havye performed chain link experiments ourselves in university? You don't know shit about nuclear physics and somehow feel entitled to say that radiation isn't real because some methed-out junkheasd on YT cited a Wikipedia article you've never previously heard of

*haven't

youtube.com/watch?v=w8vUfLrWkvo

youtube.com/watch?v=M-GliAMA-3c

nukes=fear porn for the goym

Want to hear a more probable conspiracy? Nukes are real but nobody will ever use them because they don't have the guts.

Yeah that's what we've been made to believe.

>don't have the guts.
or common sense

U know the ground is not all at the same elevation right? Also the earth isn't a sphere it's an oblate spheroid which makes a difference as well.

a=b
a^2=ab
a^2-b^2=ab-b^2
(a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b)
a+b=b
b+b=b
2b=b
2=1
2+2=1+2
2+2=3
:^)

Except you never saw the earth from space.
All you saw is composites and cgi cartoon images

Burger education

>tfw you don't realize that lithium 7 will fuse

Castle Bravo miscalculation

youtube.com/watch?v=b5tmkna-k-U

military.wikia.com/wiki/Castle_Bravo

Trapped in the Bunker
sonicbomb.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=104

Attached: 1521343930911.gif (450x338, 2.74M)

5 Declassified Nuclear Explosions Caught on Film

youtube.com/watch?v=n82pfo-LzXY

Probably phony, Hiroshima should be glass. the oceans should boil at 100,000,000 degrees

they just used conventional explosives and napalm presumably, laced with radioactive material like they did in the first tests

Attached: ablebaker.png (1118x1088, 1.05M)

Attached: 46262.png (554x752, 387K)

>two cities in Japan get nuked
>a dozen countries set off hundreds and hundreds of nuclear explosions, nearly all of which were witnessed either directly or indirectly by the public for 50 years
>some cheesedick gen Z teenage faggot calls BS because they were taught by pewdiepie to question everything

I really can't wait until your generation grows up and starts committing mass suicide once you realize how completely unprepared for real life you really are. being raised by the internet is a direct route to despair.

Have a (You)

Attached: Five_star_post.jpg (287x360, 88K)

can't wait until you old farts die out
you are the cancer that prevented us from evolving
i piss on you and your "legacy"

>can't wait until you old farts die out

I'm 31

lmfao

not everyone is your parents, faggot.

>your generation

Attached: gb.jpg (615x409, 36K)

31 and you can't see thru the nuke deception.
Good student, goot goy.

Nukes aren't real, that's why Kike Jung Un only sucks off his micro dick off about them instead of actually using them.
Radiation is a psy op as well to scare people off from nuclear plants cause they're too efficient for kikes.

>thinks physics students just learn blindly from textbooks

american education everyone

I know this thread doesn't exist.
youtube.com/watch?v=MucY5wRYByU

Attached: JEW SAY.jpg (1905x792, 310K)

I'm curious how you explain time zones with a flat earth model? Or wait lemme guess they're just another conspiracy by (((them))).

no, YOU'VE never saw the earth from space. Many, many, many, many other people have.

Not an argument

>oblate spheroid

Just when I think Jow Forums is populated by idiots, user saves the day.

Include 50s and this is a good question

ah yes, the only flat planet in the universe

Made up by Jews so the goys dont rise up again. "Nukes" are just large TNT explosions.

> There should be 6000 feet of curvature for every 100 miles, then why can some landmarks be seen from 200+ miles away?

Show a picture of Burj Dubai from 100+ miles away seen from the sea then. It's over 800m tall and on the coast, so the terrain in between is completely flat.

>At sea level, the Rayleigh atmosphere has an extinction coefficient of approximately 13.2 × 10−6 m−1 at a wavelength of 520 nm. This means that in the cleanest possible atmosphere, visibility is limited to about 296 km.

Do it faggot.

They are real, there just obsolete.

Believing their fake requires you to distrust sources of information. There is so much information on them from so many sources that you would have to distrust so much information that it would be impossible for anyone to find any information that could prove anything like this to you. This is the answer and why people will question your sanity.

How do you explain water curving around a ball.
please don't say gravity, it can't be reproduced in a lab

They're obviously real. How else do you explain the fact that there hasn't been a real hot war between any real countries in 70 years? That shit is unheard of. MAD is the only explanation.

>in a lab on a much larger ball
Brainlet

>please don't say gravity
gravity
gravity
gravity
gravity
GRAVITY

Fuck you

Attached: facepalms5.jpg (913x768, 75K)

Whats the next gen WMD user?

it's called "theory of gravity" for a reason.
Show me an experiment which proves it's real.
I'll wait

You didn't answer me.

Also:
>explain this
>except you can't use the actual explanation

No shit you can't "produce" gravity in a lab, it's the weakest fuckin force we know of, but on large scales it is extremely influential.

I'll give you another question: how do you explain gravity gradients which CAN be experimentally measured?

>no rebuttal
>durr muh magical force that cant be re-created or demonstrated is da reason

So much brainlets and trolls in this thread, arguing for nuclear "hoax" and flat Earth.

Attached: 980.jpg (401x347, 27K)

Listen faggot, if you can't reproduce it on a small scale, it doesnt exist, period.

Weak bait, but on the off chance it is not, step off a cliff and see for yourself.

>it's the weakest fuckin force we know of, but on large scales it is extremely influential.
>proof: zero

Attached: peakmutt.png (400x440, 25K)

>gravity can't be reproduced in a lab
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eötvös_experiment

Then tell me what makes things fall to the ground.

I'm denser than the air around me, of course i'll hit the ground

This. Also, sails.

>wikipedia
opinion discarded

Walk off the edge of a building. Wait for the splat. What was that magical force?

Attached: fail_20at_20failing.jpg (762x617, 86K)

Idk man check out this YouTube link

Attached: 1528083814679.gif (480x270, 1021K)

>can't be recreated
>doesn't understand basic scaling issues

Attached: 1321036439_hammer_vs_feather_moon_drop.webm (350x285, 319K)

Swarms.

Attached: 9FC5E5E6-4E0E-4503-8E56-0BB9A1C11F89.jpg (1800x1800, 412K)

We can produce a lightning in a lab.
Everything can be scaled down and reproduced, except gravity.
That means it's a meme force, it exist only in equations that have nothing to do with observable reality.

Get off your fantasy cartoon ball m8

You are a giant, puss-filled, infected vagina.

youtu.be/8Nikg4hMRjs

I think it would be easier to acutely build nuclear weapons than would be to fake Hiroshima and Nagasaki

>experiment on the moon
>on
>the
>moon
bhahahaha NO

Attached: serveimage.jpg (750x375, 25K)

"Uhh yea we can produce lightning by using voltages to simulate natural lightning which has voltages about 10 times higher. Wait wtf you can't simulate gravity with a mass that's 1e20 times smaller than we are seeing naturally? Damn it must be make believe then."

Yup, metric system user detected.

Attached: MetricSystem.jpg (284x177, 14K)

youtube.com/watch?v=lCbU8nwXk4U

In his own words: "We don't know"

>1 post by this id

Who is afraid of nukes. They are the least terrifying weapons of destruction. There is a certain satisfying and cleansing aspect that I love about them.

More terrifying is chemical and biological weapons....and land mines.

>2018
>stupid burger still believes the moon landings lie
That's a good boy

just let them carry on dutchbro
some people will never really see the world for what is, and once was

Attached: 1892-new-standard-map-of-the-world large.jpg (4773x6794, 2.63M)

>moved to Jow Forums
just like clockwork

Attached: DLMzJc5W0AApjwr.jpg (1080x1071, 96K)

Apparently nukes are not political. Yes goy, spam joos and niggers all day in that little corner we carved out for you.

Yes they are real and currently roughly 15,000 of these weapons exist in the world right now, way down from 80,000 during the height of the Col War. The United States alone had tested more than 1,000 nukes from 1946 to 1980

youtube.com/watch?v=Mn7PeI2UyEM
youtube.com/watch?v=ZWSMoE3A5DI

Oh but nukes are very political.
They are the key point, along with the space program, in the fake cold war

You still haven't explained how flat earth answers anything I've asked. I'm genuinely curious how you make these things out without gravity and a spherical earth.

>People actually respond to this shit

Attached: Girls.jpg (600x536, 77K)

yeah I have one laying around in my backyard

That's not how math works, only 0 can be put as a or b

Isnt it ex cathedra that the earth is the Center of the universe

Nah, that proof is definitely fake but is not algebraicly incorrect. It's wrong because when you factor out the (a-b) you are dividing by zero. Just meant to be a joke for the guy who wrote 2+2=3