What would society look like if marriage was never institutionalized and women got to pick who they wanted to fuck and...

What would society look like if marriage was never institutionalized and women got to pick who they wanted to fuck and breed with?

Would incels even exist after one or two generations? Would they be shunned and exiled from society? They might try to revolt or rape the women, but an army of Chadsons would fend them off. Each Chad would have a harem of 10,000 women. Each Gigachad would have a harem of 100,000. The women would share his sperm to get pregnant.

I also think there would be lots more beautiful people because they would be Chads offspring.

Attached: 6C71612D-107B-4889-9152-F70ED25B782B.png (639x641, 800K)

It would look like a nomadic gatherers-hunters society

This. Never would have evolved past the most basic.

Is there anything wrong with that though?

And not every Chad is a neanderthal dumbass. I am certain there would be some genius IQ Chads in there to invent medicines, tech etc.

that's not really how it worked. everyone seems to think women held all the power over sex back then and it's just ridiculous. just think about how we had to live back then, women are weak as shit and they can't really hunt. they needed men to survive because they just fucking suck at surviving on their own. there was a balance to it. now its just about looks and gold digging

almost nothing would change. its in our dna to seek out variety and also to raise kids together, as a couple or community.

there is one algorithm that claims very few prehistoric men had kids, and while it's arguable if it's even accurate, men were the ones killing each other all day. most genetic research indicates that every class of man was eligible to be a father and incels/betas weren't a thing

The only way ugly men would have been able to have sex would have been by force i.e. rape and capture.

While it is possible that ugly men could defeat Chads and rape and impregnate their women, it is more likely that Chad would have been the victor due to his physical strength and vigor.

you need to google what modern day hunter gatherers look like. they aren't ripped chads with huge jaws because their nutrition kind of sucks and they don't go to a gym.

Having mainly Chads around would be beneficial to a hunter gatherer society since Chads usually make the best hunter gatherers, warriors, defenders etc. Their sons would also most likely inherit their Chad genes.

>muscly guys didnt exist until there were gyms

Manual labor builds muscle you know.

This, they are small, with a lot of stamina, fast and with very good reflexes

there are tribes of people that are living like ancient hunter gatherers right now and there are pics of them if you search google. they do not have huge muscles, they mostly have low body fat wiry bodies

a lot of single mothers

fpbp
Advanced civilization was a result of the work of beta men.

Why would women want to be part of a harem of 10,000?

Women are willing to put up with almost anything for Chad. Also if their friends started doing it and it became a societal norm, most women would soon follow the herd. Harems have existed throughout history.

>Harems have existed throughout history.
Harems of slaves owned by very rich and powerful me, not Chad

Why do incels lie to themselves as cope?

>I am certain there would be some genius IQ Chads in there to invent medicines, tech etc.

First thing that this high IQ chad would invent is monogamy...

>Cope

Chad's aren't dumb, that's not the point. The point is that civilization was built on negotiations between absolute freedom and cooperation for a greater good. One of the "greater goods" was that non-Chad men would get to reproduce. Now that women are in charge, they want to renege on this point of negotiation. They want to go back to the Chad harem days. Well that's fine. We will kill the world.

Monogamy between him and Stacey you mean?

Even when monogamy is implemented, men and women still cheat on each other constantly.

Women don't think like you do, you being gay for Chad has dulled your senses.

Because truth cures incelism, and it's scary to stop being an incel and start taking responsibility for yourself.

and then we'd die out cause chad genes aren't actually benefical to the hunter-gatherer lifestyle.

youre looking back on pre civilization like an impulsive nigger.
in europe, every winter the apocalypse would descend and nobody knew each year just how long the winter would last, so deciding who got to stay within the tribe and who didnt was life or death.
the man who was the best at making arrowheads, axes, crafting fires, building traps, training dogs, telling stories or building structures was the most valued member of the tribe.

sure this was the person most vulnerable to getting the club from gigachad should he decide he didnt like the craftsmans decisions but then the craftsman was protected by the wider tribe who knew it was in everyones interests to banish the most violent and impatient.
if there was enough of the overly violent but stupid men they could simply go off and raid other tribes or take over the tribe itself, wherever they went next they would just die in the next extended winter anyway.

Physical strength isn't a relevant trait in real human combat, even when we were hunter gatherers.
Literally doesn't matter how strong you are when you get shot with 5 arrows, and a child is more than strong enough to shoot a large man and kill him with a bow if he wants.
Analysis of actual hunter gatherer societies shows that these things like size, strength, etc. are not relevant to human fitness and do not matter at all in terms of mating or rank in the tribe. Tribes are also usually monogamous and very communal.

the only time physical strength matters is in hand to hand combat with no weapons. as soon as you add in weapons to the mix, stamina and skill with the weapon is more important than brute strength. these fucking gym retards think everything is strength it's hilarious

That's because tribes didn't have real war experience neither dedicated equipment, what happened with a lot of tribes in South America that lost vs Spaniards mercenaries that had the war knowledge from a centuries long war, those tribes like the Panchos armies were made of hunters and farmers without war equipment, only a few of them had real weapons

Yup. This has been shown numerous times and I don't understand why people still contend with the research and empirical evidence.
In natural society/hunter gatherer tribes, males who are the most successful are the ones who are built like marathon runners. Around 5'6", lean 130 pounds or so, with good cardio, who can run for hours and tire out the animal causing it to collapse from exhaustion. It has been found numerous times that there is an inverse correlation between mass/height and hunting success in hunter gatherer societies.

yea that's persistence hunting. it's not surprising we paired up with dogs, they do the same thing. they run the animals they hunt into total exhaustion

itt subhuman retards that have no clue how genetics work, especially OP.

ITT incels try to deluded themselves into thinking they are useful

Pre-civ Chad hoarding up most to all of the girls has the incels of the tribe gang up and kill him. Even Pre-civ Chad can't fight his way out of a 5v1.

Smarter Pre-civ Chad gives his guards women to mate with, so they'll be on his side and won't kill him. Eventually all who are loyal to Pre-civ Chad get wives. Monogamy is born

They would get his leftovers or the ugly women then. The problem is incels believe they deserve 9/10 qts. In the past they got scraps.

If the distribution is unjust enough, the men of the tribe will turn on the order