STOP. Tell me who gets the flute

STOP. Tell me who gets the flute.

Attached: b.jpg (960x720, 152K)

B can choose to give it to C because he's a poorfag or A because she can play it but ultimately it's B's decision and she gets it by default because she made the fucking thing

It makes sense for B to give it to A and it'd be dumb not to but I don't expect her to, especially not for free

C is a shitty attempt to tug at heartstrings and appeal to liberals, it'd make more sense if it was food or some comfort item but I really don't see some impoverished child giving that much of a shit about an instrument he cant even play

Attached: 2h9ZK5T.png (1418x948, 572K)

>Italian OP
>posts stale pasta

If Jow Forums could agree on one child i wouldn't have to repost it everytime.

B decides if she wants to give/sell it to A
Otherwise it is hers. C can fuck off

B. Obviously.

Who am I to decide who gets the flute? What authority gives me the right to do this?

Attached: 1521657036967.png (869x721, 33K)

Pretty simple. B

B gets it. A should get a job and C should kill himself to increase wealth per capita

D I get the flute fuck them hos

What kind of retard wouldn't choose B

the most equitable solution is to cut the flute in thirds

How did I come into possession of the flute?

here's your answer

Attached: quote.jpg (640x384, 73K)

My cock is a flute

They should share it, in a less ideologically fucked system. B would let A use it to entertain C

A becomes a bureaucrat, B goes to the gulag, C starves to death

^this

you want an impossible answer. Life is more nuanced and fluid in reality. there is no answer yet many

either by coercion or force, violating the NAP

None. If the fuckers cant decide amongst themselves and are too retarded to share and even have the audacity to bother me with their bullshit, i just take the flute and walk away. AThe lesson they will get will be of greater value anyway

it's my flute now what are three little girls going to do about it

The correct answer

>who would you GIVE it to
Child B already has the flute. I won't take it from B.

A and C can fuck right off.

you only started this thread to post this didnt (you) mednigger

FPBP

You post this stupid thread every day

Kindly kill yourself, faggot arab.

Child A should get it. If anyone says different, you are a beta faggot who doesn't value beauty.

Attached: Albanian Chad.png (1029x1037, 33K)

winrar

Anyone who did not answer A needs to just end it.

Slide thread.

EDIT: REAL VERSION
who gets the flute now?

Attached: poop.png (960x720, 306K)

At least, post the right version.

Attached: paint.png (960x720, 271K)

>digits
okay, but A has to FORCIBLY take it from B.

does A have Khazar milkers?

fucking shills

B. She provided the materials and labor to create it, therefore it is her property.

B

Everyone else is a parasite

FORGOT ONE THING

sorry I corrected it

Attached: poop.png (960x720, 312K)

I keep it.

might makes right

So? Are you a faggot or something? Take what you want in this world or you will have nothing.

A. If B can't play it goes to waste and their efforts become pointless.

Buy two flutes. Give b the homemade one, give a and c the new

"A" deserves the flute. Success and talent > Everything else.

B is a dumb fuck for not selling flutes
C is a dumb fuck and poor

Attached: conchita-wurst-bild.jpg (622x622, 36K)

digits confirm for harder philosophical problem

This is great, because it doesn't show that there is actually a 4th party involved - that is, Child D - You, who DECIDES WHO GETS THE FLUTE.

And that is the fucking point. With capitalism, you don't NEED a central fucking government that does central planning of who gets the flute (or the equivalent thereof).

Anyone not realizing this is a fucking brainlet. Apparently, only got it..

Attached: smileandoptimism.jpg (448x478, 31K)

It's almost like pol is made of more than one person.

Italian reasoning skills everyone. Fucking Arab rape child.

Capitalists are whores, just like your ancestors, magyar shitblood.

>communists actually think it's okay to take the flute away from B and give it to A or C.

That's one of the biggest problems with communism (out of many many problems). If you want to give to the poor, give to the poor. Don't take things away from others to give to the poor.

Break flute in three parts, everyone gets a piece.

Attached: th.jpg (1052x788, 199K)

>throws bag of expired candy on ground
>"Look! Candy! YAAAAAAAAAAAYYY!"
>steals flute

Child A: National Socialism
Child B: Capitalism
Child C: Communism

Children learn quickly, they should be already adults and it could make little sense. Also, why doesnt the blue hair cunt make more flutes? Literally a stick with holes

obviously B

Looks like communism wins again

Attached: lol.jpg (960x720, 128K)

A

Says the guy who is literally holding people at gunpoint to fund his shit. You are evil. You cannot ever achieve moral virtue due to this, so naturally, the only way to ease your cognitive dissonance (when confronted with virtue) is to absolutely reject the good and to go even further - to call it evil. Thus, you call capitalists "whores" - because you cannot bear to face the fact that you are advocating a system that is in its very roots, immoral, because it is based on the initiation of the use of force.

(Not talking about crony capitalism or crapitalists, naturally.)

Attached: 358-star-trek.jpg (606x528, 64K)

It worked fine for Hitler.

>advocating a system that is in its very roots, immoral
The only thing immoral and evil in this thread is that Hungarians claim to be white when they are in reality Tatar shitskins.

Attached: Hitler Rally.jpg (1400x945, 220K)

Child B, as the provider and self employed manufacturer of the flute is its natural owner.
But that doesn't mean she should have it, in the ideal society she should be able to sell her flutes on the open market, where the people who would benefit most from them could pick them up. By doing this child A gets the flute as well, either because she bought it herself, or an organization that collects and trains musical talent gave it to her as part of a work contract.
But this doesn't mean only child A will get to enjoy the flute, any good society recognizes the need for cultureral unity. As a result child A or her manager should be contracted by the government to perform on certain holiday, or other special events. Because these are for the cultural good of society everyone, even poor child C, can experience them for practically free. This will not only bring joy to his life, but also provide a sense of cultural unity discouraging criminal behavior.
So op the answer is like always, all of them

Guess who got the flute

Attached: 1520562386543.png (960x1656, 1.95M)

child b, she made it, she can learn to play it if she wants to use it, just as she learned to build it

Sup Hammurabi?

YAMEROOOOOO

Attached: STOPPPPPP.jpg (770x702, 65K)

A isnt said to own it she just knows how to play it. C can suck a dick hes just demanding it he hasnt earned it or purchased it. B owns it, she made it and hasnt sold it.

Kill Child C.

Child A and Child B should work together, surely something that Child A has can be traded to Child B for the Flute. Or in the least we can set up some sort of economy that allows purchasing from a producer.

B. Any option without extra work is theft.
Either B keeps the flute and thats it.
Or you pay them for labour and materials and whatever else, fair price. Then give the BOUGHT PRODUCT to A or B or whatever via business transaction or you could buy the object and give as a gift.
Or give child B a job or something making those flutes.
Just taking away child Bs flute is literally theft.
Also slide thread, saged.

kek

Surprise, surprise. Christian whores also support capitalist whoredom.

Attached: Sigil of Sitri.jpg (500x500, 120K)

The answer with the most probable best outcome is A.
B made the flute but, if not able to play it and not willing to learn, she shouldn't have the flute. That would mean going for unproductivity and hoping the outcome will be good just relying on B choices about that flute, only because its fair that way. But in my opinion outcomes have priority on morals.

So B worked to make the flute and she should get a reward, either from a outer entity or from A. I'd say B should be allowed to keep the flute only and only if she is willing to learn to play it or she already knows how to, and she has to be productive with it. Otherwise she will be forced to give the flute to A with a reward for the work she has made.

Now, C could be the correct answer in a situation where C has an extremely high talent on playing the flute, but no means to get any. In that case C should get his flute and B her money for it by someone else.

So
A: best answer, highest probability of the most productive use of the flute. Morals put away to focus on outcomes

B: Wrong answer, outcomes depends on the individual's personal choices. Low probability of a productive use of the flute. Could be correct in some situations if B is monitored

C: Wrong answer, same productivity probabilty of B and unfair at the same time. Could be correct if there is certainty of a very high productive use of the flute.

Surprise idiot, I am not actually christian.
Capitalism is degenerate trash but its 10x better than communism.

mods = fags

Does everybody who votes "A" not wonder where the next fucking flute is going to come from?

Fuck the lot of you

Who ever said I support communism? Fucking shitbrain nigger.

This.

The answer with the most probable best outcome is A.
B made the flute but, if not able to play it and not willing to learn, she shouldn't have the flute. That would mean going for unproductivity and hoping the outcome will be good just relying on B choices about that flute, only because its fair that way. But in my opinion outcomes have priority on morals.

So B worked to make the flute and she should get a reward, either from a outer entity or from A. I'd say B should be allowed to keep the flute only and only if she is willing to learn to play it or she already knows how to, and she has to be productive with it. Otherwise she will be forced to give the flute to A with a reward for the work she has made.

Now, C could be the correct answer in a situation where C has an extremely high talent on playing the flute, but no means to get any. In that case C should get his flute and B her money for it by someone else.

So
A: best answer, highest probability of the most productive use of the flute. Morals put away to focus on outcomes

B: Wrong answer, outcomes depends on the individual's personal choices. Low probability of a productive use of the flute. Could be correct in some situations if B is monitored

C: Wrong answer, same productivity probabilty of B and unfair at the same time. Could be correct if there is certainty of a very high productive use of the flute.

Cut the flute in three parts. Give them to the childs

Cut the flute in three parts. Give them to the childs.

Cut the kids in three parts. Give them to the flute.

I tried

Attached: 1529157441311.jpg (960x720, 185K)

Who ever catches the flute first can keep it, okay?
*throws the flute far away*

Cut the flute in three parts. Give them to the childs my dick nigger

Attached: 1502472578176.jpg (563x542, 138K)

Kill all 3 of them and burn the flute then kill myself

Take the flute and run away far from them and keep the flute to myself.

CREATE A SOCIALIST COMMUNE AND SPLIT IT UP IN TO THREE PIECES

Attached: download (9).jpg (225x225, 7K)

A is socialism, B is capitalism and C is communism. Take this back to pol.

I buy the flute from child B for $2.
I sell the flute to child A for $20

1. Play Rock-Paper-Scissors with them, the Only Winner gets to play it first, The Two Winners get to Play a Coin Flip to see who Breaks the Tie. The Other 2 will get their turn after he plays it for 10 minutes (decided with a Coin Flip who gets to go before who).

Is that fair, or am I too kind?