Which Human Beings are the Best Genetically Tuned for War & Skullduggery?

Id say
1. Germans or at least the ones in WWII
2. Japanese, maybe even more so then Germany
3. Irish because they fought and won every battle they where ever put into
4. Vietnamese, Those lil bastards pack a punch!

Attached: 1505027860155.gif (410x396, 1.83M)

Other urls found in this thread:

google.com/search?q=most decorated ww2 soldier&oq=most decorates ww2 &aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l3.7745j0j7&client=ms-android-metropcs-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasion_of_Europe
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>Gee, I sure dont see how this thread start could derail into Jow Forums-faggotry

Americans

Depends. West African blacks are the strongest. Ashkenazi Jews have the highest average IQ. Asians have good endurance. Whites have a good balance of traits.

Nepalese.

Manlets
google.com/search?q=most decorated ww2 soldier&oq=most decorates ww2 &aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l3.7745j0j7&client=ms-android-metropcs-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

Attached: 7hy1r8ntcbjz.jpg (1080x810, 85K)

Manlets

Attached: 783_v9_ba.jpg (1080x1440, 337K)

Unironically this, we are the cream of the crop from Europe

>inb4 europoors call us mutts

Vin Diezel and Dwayne johnson types. peculiar that they have the same psychotype(ESFJ).

Manlets
>Less need for food
>Harder to hit
>Better pilots
>Better at infiltrating, can easily be confused for a kid
>Lower center of gravity, built for cornering

Manlets

Attached: 220px-Benavidez.jpg (220x281, 14K)

Not to mention
>can pack more of them into any vehicle, ship, or plane

Even in vidya; Manlets

Attached: hjfw23ihy49y.jpg (644x485, 121K)

> 1. Germans or at least the ones in WWII
Lost, after losing WW1
> 2. Japanese, maybe even more so then Germany
Also lost.
> 3. Irish because they fought and won every battle they where ever put into
more losers, only got real independence by bombing civilians
> 4. Vietnamese, Those lil bastards pack a punch!
Okay now this is defensible, back to back victory against the USA and the PRC

But you got a lotta losers in your list there, friend

This, but the ever elusive manlet subspecies known as battle gnomes. Like Benavidez. Note the distinctive lack of neck and squat form.

Max Payne killed thousands and he's only about four and a half feet tall

t. the butmad vatnik from the planethread

>1. Germans in WW2

A lot of them were the same ones who lost WW1. The rest was mainly their technology, not really genetics.

>Japanese

The Japanese have always sucked at war. Their only saving grace has always been that they were an isolated island nation that was hard to attack.

>Irish won every battle

As proud as I am of my heritage...no. Irish got meatgrindered fairly often. Also, sadly, The IRA sort of you know, lost their war with the Bongs.

>Vietnamese pack a punch

No they don't. They got the shit kicked out of them by the U.S., but unlike the U.S....they were already home.

Manlets

Attached: napoleon1.jpg (1001x1171, 333K)

Turkic-mongoloid people and tribes close related to them.Check the world map where ever they had pillaged is still a shithole those regions couldnt recover in 1000 years.
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasion_of_Europe

Attached: Mogrel.jpg (1024x705, 505K)

>1. Germans or at least the ones in WWII
Muslims haven't had a successful military campaign in over 300 years.
>2. Japanese, maybe even more so then Germany
Stuck on an island and failed in every attempt to leave. Sometime in spectacular fashion.
>3. Irish because they fought and won every battle they where ever put into
Literally inbred french.
>4. Vietnamese, Those lil bastards pack a punch!
Beyond retarded logic of "we can't win so burn the whole country" when the Mongols came around.

>West African blacks are the strongest

On what basis? All of the world's strongest men are northwest European. They're the best sprinters maybe.

>Germans
>Muslims
You sly dog

Attached: IMG_5109.jpg (1021x1600, 176K)

Nordics, especially those with direct blood-connection to the Pleiadians

Attached: 877510.jpg (1467x2351, 482K)

The traditional European method of warfare of melee combat between knights ended in catastrophe when it was deployed against the Mongol forces as the Mongols were able to keep a distance and advance with superior numbers. The New Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 29 says that "Employed against the Mongol invaders of Europe, knightly warfare failed even more disastrously for the Poles at the Battle of Legnica and the Hungarians at the Battle of Mohi in 1241. Feudal Europe was saved from sharing the fate of China and Muscovy not by its tactical prowess but by the unexpected death of the Mongols' supreme ruler, Ögedei, and the subsequent eastward retreat of his armies."[54]
>pic related Batu Khan Murders some russian prince just for giggles with a dagger

Attached: SmirnovVS_KnMihailChern.jpg (876x1134, 306K)

Assuming all humans have some base traits and stats
>Blacks:
+20% strength
+75% chance of aggro in social interactions
-50% intelligence
Special Abilities: Rhythm, Gibs

>Hispanics:
+30% Endurance (only activated when in Labor)
+10% Production (only activated when Cultivating)
-25% Intelligence
Special Abilities: Reproduction, Cooking

>Whites
+25% Intelligence
+85% Income (after Economy is researched)
-10% Social Cohesion (Double if Democracy is activated)
Special Abilities: Nation Building, Total War

>Arabs:
+40% Heat Resistance
+100% Religious Devotion
-30% Intelligence
Special Abilities: Fervor, Outrage

>Asians
+100% Intelligence
+60% Population Growth
-30% Strength
Special Abilities: Horde, Great Leap Forward

>Jews
+20% Personal Income
+20% Telecommunications Reach
-50% External Trust

Special Abilities: Media Presence, The System

>Ashkenazi Jews have the highest average IQ.
Maybe if you like sickle cell and Schizophrenia

Thank God for the sickle cell.

Attached: 47070C73-614B-4BE0-88EB-1598FCAC4306.jpg (1920x1080, 159K)

You are a very confused retard.


----------------------------
> 1. Germans or at least the ones in WWII
Lost, after losing WW1.................. (they proceeded to kick the shit out of the world you no history ignoramus)
> 2. Japanese, maybe even more so then Germany
Also lost........................(They beat the fuck out of the US navy, marines and chinese not to mention that their military
> 3. Irish because they fought and won every battle they where ever put into
more losers, only got real independence by bombing civilians....................(A political solution was what free'd them up)
> 4. Vietnamese, Those lil bastards pack a punch!
Okay now this is defensible, back to back victory against the USA and the PRC...............(NVA lost every battle they fought with the USA)

But you got a lotta losers in your list there, friend
----------------------------

unironically Africans. naturally lanky which is great for running and ruck marching

Americans

we took almost all North America, we aren't ever going to lose it, and about anytime we go back to deal with Old World shit we are victors

Attached: barbary wars.jpg (738x540, 166K)

>Blacks
>Strength not speed
Where in the fuck do you guys get your information on blacks from? Most blacks are either lanky or fat with a few giga niggas mixed in the bunch. Their percoeved strength comes from unpredictable violent behavior but they arent particularly good at lifting things or manual labor.

Finnish people, give to crazy fuckers speed and vodka, after that serious shit starts happening.

Attached: IMG_20180612_214755.jpg (1080x1072, 372K)

The Poles
>Times Germany conquered Moscow: 0
>Times Poles conquered Moscow: 4

>germans in ww2
You fucking serious OP?
>japanese
Aside from bushido not really, their primary skill was being far away enough to not be actually threatened by anyone until the 1700/1800s since everyone kept sinking and drowning at sea only to have the scraps inevitably picked off.
>irish
Debatable, some hard fighters from there for sure, but to say they won every battle is just dumb, plus the IRA never really succeeded in their goals, Norn Iron is still UK clay.
>vietnamese
Great on defense solely because of all the jungle they can hide in. About it really, also location.
All that autism aside, it'd go down to people in adverse conditions like sherpas and gurkhas, though I don't think sherpas delved much into military matters since no one could really get to them.
What were the other 3 times? I know about the time the PLC held Moscow for a few years.

The US has employed a deadly combination of angry White and Latino men since after the Mexican American War, shit some angry Mexicans fought for the US during that war

Irish

>no. Irish got meatgrindered fairly often
true but only because they were always on both sides

True, but we did most of it by inadvertently giving smallpox to stone age forest tribes.
>inb4 womp womp

Asians, especially the Chinese. Africans take 2nd place.

Attached: 1530067469291.png (755x1000, 799K)

Attached: 17821BEC-FA08-4F77-9472-68DDDF087C9A-190-000000A4F8C58083.jpg (667x725, 163K)

>black
>strong

they're runners, not fighters.

"In a fight: anger is as good as courage"
Make sure they're always fighting someone taller than themselves

>two countries around the sizes of a U.S. state wach takes on the rest of the world and loses after years of fighting
>IRA was unquestionably outgunned and outmanned yet were a significant problem
Wow, they must be really bad warriors!

As manlet, can confirm that we have an innate will to dominate

>Americans (from the country)
Tough farm boys, access to the best modern tech
>Slavs
Basically cave men, very strong according to the Olympics
>Persians
Very strong according to Olympics, brave and dogmatic, but lack modern tech
>Central Europeans (Germans)
Somewhat tough but very smart, but are now cucked and feminized
>Irish
Love to fight and never back down
>Jews
Tell them their precious Israel is at stake and they'll fight tooth and nail, access to basically all tech America has... hmm..
>Chinese
There's like a billion of them, no souls
>Niggers
Easily enslavable, animalistic violence potential

He's fat. That's why he has no neck. Fit/thin manlets are tiny and have necks unless they're just giant dwarfs.

>Their percoeved strength comes from unpredictable violent behavior but they arent particularly good at lifting things or manual labor.
This desu.

I think Ryan Faulk said that in one of his multitude of race video.
>All of the world's strongest men are northwest European
You may be right, but that's a pretty small sample size.

>they arent particularly good at lifting things or manual labor.

Evident by the amount of beatings that had to be given out to keep their labor standards up.

>You call this a barn Kuntakinte?! *whoopishhh* Stop napping in the watermelon fields and get back to work! You're not getting welfare for another hundred years!

Attached: download (1).jpg (259x194, 7K)

>All of the world's strongest men are northwest European
That's a funny way of saying Iranian...

Where are all your precious Faroe Island ubermen in the Olympics? Oh that's right, they test for roids...

Attached: iranian-weightlifter-kianoush-rostami-won-gold-at-the-summer-olympics-in-rio-last-year__702094_.jpg (616x836, 189K)

And yet every continent aside from Antarctica is now filled with Kraut and Irish Diaspora. South America, Mexico, the US, and even central Asia is all SAUERKRAUT. It's one thing that the Chinese have gotten good at too. Regardless of how much they fail in conventional warfare, they still have enough people with successful lives influencing and manipulating the world. Only true patricians are able to wage war in such a subtle and bordered war. Fun fact: Mexican music, the midwest, and Argentina wouldn't exist without the many rejected Germans, Poles, and Czechs that moved there. You see, that's something that Anglos and Russians have never been good at, they think that land conquest can somehow stump the family unit, religion, and culture (something that anglos and Russians have also lost in the last 50+ years)

So the Irish & Germans have to Battle
The Vietnamese and Japanese
on neutral grounds ( say the plains of Mongolia)
Who wins that one?

Attached: 1474879880823.png (459x306, 155K)

The 1/3 reich

>dont go into threads you can't handle faggot.

Fear the dark manlets.

Attached: IMG_4810.png (668x466, 36K)

Now that's just a matter of flexibility vs. Organization. I think it depends on who is defending their home turf. An Irish man shooting from a rooftop is incredibly effective in defending an Irish town, but not so useful when taking the offence.

No fair the Finns Dont need to aim

Battle nomes

Attached: CE95656D-5227-4225-8BAB-6698F30DE293.gif (324x244, 2.31M)

Germanic peoples historically.
The only reasons Rome dominated was because they had better weapons technology, organization, and a very decently trained military force.
Germanic peoples are just plain stronger.

On a land mass The G.I's would win. The Japanese wouldn't have fresh fish and wont fight, the Vietnamese don't have jungle but dig a lot of tunnels. But if they where on an Island or Jungle the Yellow man would chop the German-Irish up!

Attached: IMG_1005.jpg (1600x1235, 590K)

Irish and Germans:
>Superior tactics
>Superior gear, thanks to German industry
>Irish are tough af, Never back down when attacked
>Germans are smart af, able to prioritize resources (at least nowadays)
Vietnam and Japan
>Suicidal rushing, potentially draining Germano-Irish morale
>Geurilla Warfare, (Same deal as rushing)

hey pol
your board stinky lol

Attached: 1529155983919.png (730x613, 354K)

why are poltards such s .o.yed faggot

What the fuck?