The face says yes but those legs...
Is this a trap?
probably a trap, due to how hard s/he's trying to look feminine.
if a trap, deserves a gut punch or rib kick.
its a 12 year old girl from Australia going to a 70s themed bluelight disco in 2009
was posted on her fb
Is this a trap?
that's 56% of a trap.
also, nice trips.
nice
wait, she's 21 now, not nice not nice
If that's your metric I feel bad for you man.
Check the shape of the face, the throat, the shoulders, the hips, and the angle of the legs. To my knowledge, I have never failed based on these. Sometimes it can be hard to tell when elements are not present or are obscured in the picture, though.
considering the area she grew up in has likely dropped two brats by now
So whats the verdict?
Pretty sure it's a male, but I'm not certain. The image is also seems to be shopped, at least in that the person was shopped onto that background. The hips appear to be the wrong shape, the shoulders are pulled back to obscure their width, and the choker is obscuring the throat.
The legs being spread the way they are also makes it difficult to be certain of the angle, but I think they would come down straight if they were brought together.
also if what this guy's saying is true, it is harder to tell before they're finished going through puberty. It could be a girl in early pubescence. An oddly proportioned one, anyway.
Additionally, the shoulders are very sharp, women's shoulders usually have a nicer curve to them. Women's mouths are also usually in line with their jaw, whereas this one's mouth is well above. I find with Scandinavian women in particular the jaw tends to be relatively lower, but they also tend to have a sharper jaw shape that isn't present here.
Oh, and the jaw tends to be lower as well with a lot of American models. I'm not sure why, but I'm pretty sure it's because Americans have shit taste.
you're a virgin ain't cha
no, although I haven't had sex in three years if that counts
I think this is a female, going by your critera. Her arms and wrists are very delicate, although her fingers looks a bit masculine.
That's a girl.
I have a girlfriend with a similar body type, except muscular. The knees and the wrists give it away. She's probably super tight.
lmao
your uncle raping you in a woodshed doesn't count
I felt like a pedo there for a moment, but she's legal now.
whatever it is I'd fuck it
wait nvm
What does the belt say? Playboy, divaboy? Can't distinguish the first letters.
>a picture from 9 years ago has been used before?
retarded and a virgin
all your google search proved is that you're not the only virgin who can't tell a girl from a trap
dumb leaf
Thank God Putin made Hillary lose.
prove it's a girl
uwuu im a cute girl (female)
the authorities have been notified, enjoy prison..
Trap
I don’t get it, her skirt is see through and you can’t see a penis
Holy fucking shit I can see her panties
Made it easier to see
dude she's 12
Just proving she ain’t a trap
search the entire net for another pic of her
you will not find one
traps don't get all dressed up and not attention whore with multiple pics
You have to admit that this edit looks pretty cool
Look at her fucking panties, that is all the proof you need. No bulge.
Do you prefer this
Or this
Can’t get cooler
That’s obviously a girl you retards. It’s almost like you’ve never seen irl bitches. But I’d still fuck her even if she was a guy because I haven’t had sex in 3 years (fatcel).
Another creepy version
That's not creepy. This is creepy.