Evolutionally speaking, how are females attracted to ugly men if they have good personalities...

Resources are useless if you have shit genes

we disagree.

men look for women to give them children, women look for security, either through physical or financial means

Women do not decide on a mate the same way a man does.

AF/BB
you are denying the reality of the female sexuality
they have 1 guy for emotional support, 1 guy for financial, and another for sexual.
even if you are all 3, she will think she can do better
if you arent constantly cheating on your gf, you are a cuck

If your wallet is bigger than your face. Think of it as a “bag for men.”

The huge amount of old fucks who have young wives giving them kids says differently.

Flip The situation then it makes sense.
If you had to choose 10/10 ultrastacy but with absolutely bitch personality. Or 5-6/10 with nice caring personality.

Because attractiveness is relative
For most of human existence you didn't have your internet to look at the top 0.1% of attractiveness so you made due with what you had.

dude is just average looking, be easy on him

Becuse their kids will have "good" personalities (meaning they work well in groups and contribute to society unlike dung-hut dwelling "alphas"). Women that seek out "alpha" chads and tyrones lose their kids to the prison system, or in the days of yore, the gallows.

The biological purpose of a person is to survive and replicate, what is the point of resources if you end up producing some inferior off spring? A women cucking an ugly man makes sense but it is still risky for her to to this which makes me think why ugly men can even pull at all just on personality

>d to ugly men if they have good personalities
Daddy issues.

i would say in my experience 8 out of 10 would pick ultrastacy.

Because for most human history we didn't live in gynocentric societies that focused on pleasuring women's most hedonistic desires.

It not even personality that counts.
women only care about status. high level men is like a limited edition iphone to them. If the society somehow praises being one eyed + one hand as the ultimate male virtue then that'll be the sexually popular guy.
And just like iphone they just throw it away one day once the planned obsolescence kicks in and social wibd changes

Ultrastacy even if she is a cunt would produce better off spring. Ugly people are only usually smarter because they work harder at being smarter

The only reason you claim "ugly" men are inferior is because women don't consider them attractive. Yet, was this really a problem for most of human history? An ugly man did not need to care if his wife found him attractive, he simply either had to take her through force or through diplomacy via her parents.

You are judging inferior off spring solely on looks. Stephen Hawking was an ugly fuck with a terrible disease, and I hope he knocked up a lot of bitches because he was brilliant.

They are usually unattractive because genetically they are more defective. Your point explains why ugly property exist but not why women still go for them

Well thats why white women are attracted to non white men since there are none left that have any manly traits.

lol give me a real life example in your personal life how society is gynocentric

Do you think premature ejaculation is a defect?
It allowed men to impregnate women faster and then get back to working.

Just because some traits may some not particular useful in modern society doesn't mean they didn't have an evolutionary purpose.

Furthermore, the vast majority of women are just as ugly as men, they just lie to everyone by wearing make-up to appear prettier than they really are.

It is a defect because it reduces bonding

Survival and sexual attraction are intertwined for female

Want me to tell you how I know this post was made by a 20 year old incel LARPER?

He is out of her league.

Some girls have a semblance of intelligence. It occurs to them that we are no longer in the jungle and thus the paradigm of what is considered an alpha has changed drastically. Emotional/mental bonding and stability become more desirable and a career driven by intelligence trumps almost anything as it will yield you the most societal benefits by far.

This, they seem looksmatched.

Shes the ugly one in that couple

Dude looks better than she does. Don’t be fooled by a tit hanging out

Most effective pairs happen when you have two parents with different sets of immunity resistances.

If you think women want "pretty men" you are in for a wild ride.

Chad is not necessarily "beautiful" - beauty is for women only. Chad is MASCULINE, thus high test, thus good sexual health, thus good offspring. We commonly associate attractive men with masculinity, but its not always the case.

Far more goes into inferiority/superiority of offspring than looks. An ugly assertive person capable of standing his ground and providing is superior to a good looking faggot with no confidence in terms of producing viable offspring. Failure to assert and defend yourself is the greatest error you can commit in nature. Failure to be good looking is pretty insignificant in contrast to that.

if you aren't one of these super attractive, high achieving men who date the super attractive women, why aren't you just chasing women in your league?
aren't you doing the fucking same thing as them? you ignore all the minor or unattractive girls while complaining how women do the same.

Source?

Looks is correlated with a higher IQ. Ugly people just work harder on average to make up for their short comings.

I’m talking about super attractive women that go for ugly men with good personalities

personalety= bank account

sure if you mean that.

Women are drawn to power and money like moths to light.

Thats all you need to know.

If she thinks you can give her strong healthy babys and a comfortable life she is yours.

Is that even in English?

High IQ =/= high functional intelligence. Jow Forums is full of high IQ individuals incapable of interacting socially with other people, appearing sane or even keeping their lives in any kind of order.

We can’t really say what’s attractive to the female mind physically speaking, I’m sure he has a very handsome bank account

Exemple : Left is more masculine, but left is prettier. Who do you think is more attractive to a woman?

Attached: lol123.png (819x540, 757K)

As much as you'd like to think otherwise, people are attracted to different things, even women. Generalizations are useful tools for navigating the surrounding reality, but poor tools for predicting the behavior of an individual human. Some women prioritize physical qualities, other women prioiritize mental qualities. This is true regardless of the perceived "league".

women want good looking, sweet men just as much as men want good looking, sweet women. why would you want an old, fucked-up looking men? what's so enjoyable about it? when she has sex with him she could have:
a) sweet boy, cuddling, having sex, touching bodies, kissing, feeling joy
b) rough boy, fucks hard, finishes in 3 minutes, goes to sleep

Where did I say anything about IQ?

I said people with intelligence driven careers. Attractive people can always opt out of using their brains to do stupid shit like trying to become actors, or work in the service industry etc. Ugly fuckers who are smart can choose between STEM or failure.

Men are for strength, either body or mind. Women are for beauty. You faggots disgust me.

No, because ugly guys have other good qualities--brains, fitness, humor, good attitude, manliness, decent penis size. Nit all girls like pretty boys. Some prefer rugged ugly guys. Just stay in shape and you can get a pretty girl. Just like if a butterface girl has a hot body and good grooming and a little friendly femininity--she is able to get a hot guy. Same goes for guys. Stay in shape, dress nicer than the slob next to you, and have a good attitude and you, too, can get a pretty girl. And if you are smart, too, all the better. If a pretty girl picks you, she's got smarts as well. Then you can have lots of smart and attractive kids. Win/win.

We are attracted to our opposites. "Sweet" man is like a woman. That doesn't mean that the guy must be protective and respectful, but if you are a man that acts like a woman you are sexually unattractive.

This, it's just like men, some guys like petite girls with tiny bodies they can throw around, others like BBWs, we're all different. I don't know why people should keep themselves up at night worrying about what women you'll never even meet want in life.

If you think women would pick either choice in unison, you must not be that experienced. Some would prefer a short rough fuck over feminine lovemaking, others the oppopsite.

you realize the reason we are all here is becomes our moms did not cuck our dads and sleep with an alpha chad?

if our mothers had slept with alpha chads we would be out there socializing instead of talking on this board

He's probably got a monster cock and a good job. And she's probably a total hoe behind is back with her girlfriends.

I'm glad to be here.

>Evolutionally speaking, how are females attracted to ugly men if they have good personalities?

they aren't.

by sweet i didn't mean feminine. more like jofrey from game of thrones or melfoy in harry potter. women will find them "sweet" and fall in love with them.
most women who like tough, hard guy are often hard and tough themselves.

Girls will go out with guys with nice faces, sure

But a lot of times you see hot girls going out with guys that aren't good looking but they're fucking ripped and/or tough guys.

Being strong and looking tough will take you a lot further than just having good looks

Only retards have this type of hair

In that pic:
>man
>oh boy I got jessica
>oh boy time to get married
>all this waiting paid off
>my money won the day

>women
>oh snot I got knocked up by chad
>thank goodness for money bags mcgee over here
>tee hee time to marry
>tee hee time to divorce

Nah the Brazilanon is right: the more feminine the woman, the more masculine her partner needs to be in orded to balance the sexual polarity. We are mostly attracted to sexual polarities of equal intensity. Likewise, a low feminine person will be attracted to a low masculine.

Yes, I agree. If you are a scumbag and beat your wife she will leave since her life and security is in danger. But a man must always be capable of violence and revolt. A good archtype would be the medieval knight.

The only real difference between them is age. Left looked like right when he was younger.
"Prettiness" ends with age. Attractive men get more masculine as they age.

Note that the intensity of sexual polarity manifested within any person is not necessarily visible to the surface. Inspecting the overall sexual behavior of the person is a better judge.

Did you also read that book about Gender and Character?

>the more feminine a woman looks, the more masculine her boyfriend has too look

Attached: 46647647647.jpg (1024x990, 247K)

No chance. The right one will never mature into as masculine man as the left one. He already is close to his peak masculinity and will only wither over time.

Evolutionary speaking, women have never the ability to choose who they marry or breed with.
Its why they have such bad judgement, they have never ever been selected for making any serious choices.

Attractivnes and not being attractive is subjective. A good personality always makes you more attractive, confidence being the most important thing that will make you attractive

I read it in some book years ago, can't remember the name though. It was something like way of man, art of man.

Attached: 647647647647.jpg (736x719, 61K)

A man must be capable of violence. Right doesn't look like the type.

You choose to be here because you're sad and you think that real life looks like clickbait articles in a magazine of your choice

Attached: 648648.jpg (970x546, 50K)

Men and women have two sets of attraction triggers. Men are aesthetically aroused because they spent tens of thousands of years looking at women for a specific hip-waist ratio, known as birthing hips, when considering who to mate with. Women are aware of this, which is why they spend so much time in front of a mirror focusing on improving their appearance as a means of seduction.

Women never spent tens of thousands of years looking at men for a specific hip-waist ratio, which is why a man's physical appearance isn't an important factor when considering who to mate with. Women are not nearly physically aroused by visual stimuli as men are, which is why so few of them watch porn when they masturbate.

tl;dr women don't give a flying fuck what you look like. Your physical appearance isn't a female attraction trigger. Anyone saying otherwise is a frustrated chump attempting to blame his failure with women on his parents genetics rather than taking responsibility for his own failure.

Attached: Alek Minassian.jpg (525x580, 56K)

90% of Jow Forums is incels. If you make a not so shit thread about this you are most certainly guaranteed replies.

Violence is not needed. Assertivness and not being scared of confrontation however is

Personality is a faggot word meaning "weakness and cowardice combined with lack of resources and connections". When a man is strong both physically and mentally and is bonded to a tight group of loyal male friends, he'll have all females he want. Personality? Wut? Here girl, check my abs and let's ride my ferrari. I'll fuck you, I'll hug you and I'll protect you. Boom! The girl is wet.

As I said, femininity and masculinity is more than looks. Based on a superficial analysis of your pics, neither of them seem very masculine nor feminine. Their sexuality has very androgynous quality.

Cute couple though.

Women are attracted to good looking men. They love hygiene, nice clothing, nice hair, cute faces, nice voices, a good looking beard etc.

Whats his money situation like? What does his dad do?

Yeah - shes there because he is rich.

imagine women without make up. they suddenly dont look that perfect anymore.

Only to the extent what those qualities reveal about the man's ability to exercise mastery over his own life, and his ability to be a dependable provider. There is nothing innately attractive in any of those qualities by itself.

Attraction is useless if the situation doesn't allow for social interaction and making contact.

Good personalities are a sign of good genes related to the brain which is what humans compete with. Being attracted to a good looking idiot would decrease the odds of survival.

nope. You've been conditioned to believe that by marketing campaigns.

There are 5 universal attraction triggers all straight women share. They are:

>he is a leader of men
>he is a successful risk taker
>he is a protector of loved ones
>he has a willingness to emote (Prince, R Kelly, Robert Smith)
>he is preselected by other women

You could look like Brad Pitt from the movie fight club and it wouldn't matter if you aren't demonstrating to women that you have at least one of the above five traits.

Attached: Fight Club.jpg (2048x1365, 408K)

>fuck her ass
>she gets pregnant
man i hate when that happens

I agree in the sense that you must stand your ground. But I believe that would also agree that standing your ground and not being scared implicitly implies that you are not going to be shaken by the prospect of physical escalation, thus you are capable of it.

Fear of violence is awful, womanlike. Unrestrained violence is the "sumbag" type : Women sometimes will fuck them but they are terrible long term because they are not consistent and their violence might eventually turn to the women themselves. It also denotes lack of logic, control, and womanlike sentimentalism and anger.

Controlled violence is perfect - true alpha. It's the image of the mafioso that loves his family, or the upstanding working man that is not scared to shoot a gun if need be. Women are attracted to the physical prowess but feel safe at the same time.

Very good post. I would only add that physical appearance is ONLY AS IMPORTANT AS IT REFLECTS MASCULINE PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAITS.

>i fuck the absolute shit out of her tight ass
>cum inside of her
should we tell him?

*snap*
yup, that's going in my abortion scrapbook

Well fuck you too

>Isn’t this a good way to flush away their genetics?
Yeah, it is. It's almost as if roasties don't think anything through. They only thing they care about is how they feel at any given moment.