Redpill me on your ideals

Redpill me on your ideals.

Attached: images.png (300x168, 5K)

no u

not today, cia
go away, nsa
nice try, fbi
dirty tricks, mi6
no thank you, gchq
don't mind me, kgb
at least you're trying your best, csis
is this really your priority, navajo tribal utility authority
not taking your bait, department of state

Attached: 1514088617711.png (633x758, 29K)

bid dick
money
based and redpilled

Attached: 65894781.jpg (1200x675, 570K)

>be me
>be born 1988
>be friends w t.swift
>fake suicide
>change last name from Mitsubishi
>lesson learned?

be yourself

Attached: asdds.png (685x339, 34K)

individualism is better than tribalism (treating people as individuals as opposed to grouping them with others of their kind in ant capacity)

self-determination is a human right and is currently being taken away from people in the west via immigration and voter fraud

smaller governments AND smaller nations are more effective and conducive to the happiness of the people in said nations

capitalism is inherently better than socialism

monopolies are just as dangerous as governments

abortion is morally wrong because everyone has a right to life

etc

get a redpilled haircut

This guy speaks to me. I can go for a lot of what he's saying.

literally just be nice with everyone
be indulgent
if people hate you don't hate them

I also like what this guy is saying. I should be nice to people, even if they don't like me. I should also eat more pastry.

Glad you think so. I always loved politics but right now there's a massive disconnect from political policies and real-qorld impacts. I feel that at least some of what I said would be obvious or agreeable to most, but propaganda has made politics just a form of tribalism desu

do unto others is really good, but I disagree with being indulgent personally. I prefer self-control. Though I struggle with it personally, too.

I disagree with everything you wrote except the first one, which is obvious and agreeable to most
that being said politics are just a form of tribalism, especially in the US but not that much more than in the rest of the world

the Earth is planet shaped

wait no I agree with the monopoly part and I don't care about the small nations thing

Why do you think self-determination shouldn't be a human right?

I don't think you know what individualism or determinism means but other than that I can get behind it.

Idk what else to call treating everyone as an individual as opposed to part of a group but I never mentioned determinism, otherwise thanks

self-determination is a human right but in the US just like in France and many other represntative democraties it's almost inexistant, whether it is from the lack of political, economical and sociological education of a large majority of the population or from the elections system, which often encourages mindless bipartisanism and is just a glorified marketing campaign because politicians want power, not the greater good, which is a vicious circle

also I'm gonna stop before my writing gets even more incoherent good night

Jesus was black.
Ronald Reagan is the devil.
The government is lying about 9/11.
Open the door.
Get on the floor.
Everybody walk the dinosaur.

It's not a human right rn but it should be, I think you misunderstood what I wrote, but that's fine. Goodnight.

>abortion is morally wrong because everyone has a right to life

You had me until here, churchfag

It's reasonable on a secular level too...

1.) does everyone have a right to life?
answer: yes, objectively
2.) are feoti people
answer: depends. Let's answer the logic of what answer you'd give.
2a.) is it a person if it doesn't have feeling/emotions/consciousness/etc?
2b.) is it a person if it will have those above later?
depending on your answer to those, then you would either agree or disagree with it. For me, it's extremely reasonable because there's no reason to say that something that will objectively, inevitably become a person unless stopped should have their right to life taken away from them.

I misread determinism. Your right, people "should" judge people on an individual level, but that's not how the human mind works. It takes short cuts and perfers familiarity. Add to that, that there is no way to alter that behavior without removing people's right to associate with the people they perfer. You should take the same approach you do with capitalism. You understand it works because it embraces people's existing behavior and also that if left unchecked the results would be unsustainable. That's what tolerance means. You don't have to like each other as long as you collectivly understand that everyone is entitled to the same rights you are, simply by virtue being human.

no u

lole

Attached: 1527895376709.png (562x389, 217K)

Yeah, that'll help the muslim invasion problem go away. frenchcuck

It's a grey area. We don't have the answer either possibility is could be true. The question comes down to risk. Would your rather risk being responsible for murder or forcing someone to give birth who could have avoided it by other means.

i agree

Aint got none

Democracy as a rule degenerates into mob rule over time, and a liberal autocracy that guarantees the rights of its citizens and promotes science and culture is a superior form of governance.

>a liberal autocracy that guarantees the rights of its citizens and promotes science and culture
Even if such an animal existed, how would you keep it from going to shit once the enlightened autocrat at its center dies?

Severely underrated post.

Attached: 1534257795394.gif (250x194, 13K)

Literally everything except the last comment.

Abortion is morally wrong yes, but i personally believe it is still a right needed in many cases.

left wing nationalism is the only good form of leftism and the only good form of nationalism

Attached: gang weeed.png (500x656, 324K)

CIA is behind /lgbt/, homohate and aids, they just can't let white men leave in peace