Picture

Actually this.

Why can't I take the flute for myself? I seem to have that authority.

If you're giving me the authority to decide who gets what, it's all mine

Give to A for being the best.

Gas the other two betas.

>Child B
Even though Child B cannot play the flute, they did create it therefor it is theirs.

Child C needs to get some tide pods.

Pay B to teach C how to make flutes and then pay C a low wage for making flutes to sell to A.

Attached: 1524078473684.png (960x720, 137K)

this ignores that both B and C can also learn to play the flute. however C has the most to gain because learning to play the flute gives him a skill that can earn him money

This guy knows.

But it's not his.

Attached: DapperNarrowClam-small.gif (500x200, 1000K)

A. Giving it to B or C is a waste.
No point in a silent flute.

except a communist would let b keep the flute, assuming of course this is occuring under communism. If not then child b didnt actually make the flute, she exploited someone else to make it. But assuming we have already gotten to collective ownership of the means of production the flue b makes with hew own labor belongs to b. If she was a worker at a flue factory and made it during her working hours then she would still have to buy it with exactly one flutes worth of labor. But assuming she made it as a hobby in her spare time its her flute.

A would already have a flute if she was being trained as state flute player, or be able to purchase a flute with exactly one flute worth of labor based on whatever she does.

C does not exist in socialism, and is roughly equivalent to child A and B apart from the flute issue.

the real question

Attached: 3children.jpg (961x682, 197K)

But B made the flute you idiot. B could learn how to use it.

Child B, unless you can persuade child C to pay for it or Child B to give it to child A to make money off of the performance.

Any other answer is communism.

Keeping it for myself. Get fucked, kids

>Take the flute
>convince the children that the songs I play are what ensures the sun will rise the following day
>become a god.

Attached: Consider the Following.png (685x958, 391K)

Is it a skin flute?

If I had enough money, I would buy the flute from B and give it to A so that I could listen to music. Otherwise, B should keep it. I'd teach C some useful skill if I could, or at least give him something more useful to him then a flute.

Socialists/communists: Give C the flute because he got dealt an unfair advantage in life which is why he couldn't learn the flute. B should learn to share!

National Socialists: Give B the flute because it's her own work and she could always learn how to use the flute.

Neo cons: Just give A the flute because she's the best at using it.

>break it in half and throw it in the bin then slap all 3 of them for being little bitches
I would have broke it into 3 and given each one before slapping the shit out of them....this is also acceptable to me. Good call!

B could also make another one.
A already knows how to play so they probably already have one.
C has fuck all

give it to B? of course. She made it, even though A can play it doesnt mean she has a right to get someone elses stuff. Maybe B made it to get rich, to play it or to break it, doesnt really matter if she uses it as a chopstick to put up her arse. It is still B's property

If C has fuck all he got better things to worry about than playing a flute, doesn't he?

Learning to play it could earn him money.
A already has the ability to earn money playing the flute
B has the ability to earn money by making flutes
C has nothing

confirmed for not knowing what communism is.

B gets the flute. Giving it to A or C would be alienation of labor.

It's amazing how few Jow Forums users miss an important part of this question. The three children all are assuming you are AN ADULT.

Attached: download.jpg (276x183, 14K)

B made it, so it's hers. It's not even a question.

Well, if it's mine to give, I sell it to the person who can pay the most for it.

Attached: merchant.gif (419x313, 2.84M)

Someone post flutestamps

How does some poor fag earn money with playing a flute?
Who is it going to teach him?

Maybe if C didn't waste his time with flutes he could earn a reasonable income.

Can i just ignore the fighting children and continue my day?

It should go to B

This is also a good answer-- in fact it was the first thought I had

This picture reeks of socialism. I'll commission B to make more flutes so I can stuff them up the ass of whoever drew it.

Attached: You're right.png (1919x1075, 1.69M)

a
what kind of question is that even

it's not mine to give, so B keeps it

Kek

>It should go to B
It should never have went anywhere else. Even the fact that you're deciding who gets it and that there's any debate at all is a travesty.

obviously the flute belongs to B
but in all fairness B should lend it to A and invite C to listen so they could all enjoy A play

this

top tier aussie shitposting

This. The whole question begins with you fucking stealing the flute and playing God. You don't have the right to decide, and neither does the state.

t h i s

What gave you the idea that they could learn? I was under the impression that they were trying to set a strict set of parameters with the question, that one can play, one can build, and one has nothing. Not that one can learn to do anything.
If they can learn, why not tell B to teach the rest how to make it?

There's no distinction between a socialist and a capitalist outcome then in this case.

Another thing would be if B said the flute was built with her materials and her factory by C in exchange of a mutually agreed payment. Then you'd say C, and I'd say B.

Attached: 1rope.jpg (961x548, 192K)

based and redpilled
this

Definitely not C. It would be wasted on C. B made it so it's hers. The fact that the other 2 are arguing over it means that they're trying to steal her flute, making them niggers. B could choose to trade it but if the others are just trying to take it for nothing, then they can fuck off.

Kill them all, keep for myself.

Attached: 1537783903128.jpg (960x720, 156K)

B should sell it to A in exchange for whatever A gets in her concerts. Division of labor.

C should open a book or something. Libraries are free.

LMAOOOOOOOO

B. What's the argument here? This isn't some metaphor for an economic ideal. Manufacturers work under contract, selling their time for money. B is a freelancer, so the same rules don't apply.

C, because only males can be truly great musicians.

It's just a shitty bait thread, and most everyone agrees it should go to B. That is until the shillbots arrive