ITT: Promising software that sadly failed in the end

Nice delusion.

Attached: 1523017469352.png (800x571, 82K)

Nice fake graph.

Attached: 197eaecf-025e-4a3a-91cd-6a04ec638c38.png (500x375, 51K)

The one you posted? Yeah!
community.spiceworks.com/networking/articles/2462-server-virtualization-and-os-trends

>nuh-uh

It's okay Pajeet, you get your shill rupees.

>almost every server
>on the majority of smartphones

>failed
whatever let's you sleep at night

for me, its Steam on Linux.

Attached: 1364145828417_jpg.jpg (945x1279, 371K)

Not an argument.

Attached: 1491923427773.png (1385x945, 200K)

>On-premises
of course, almost nobody runs linux on desktops, and you need them to match
actual internet services all run linux though

What wait, there's an OSX server?
Or is that implying that faggots run servers on their laptops?

>le almost every server meme
I want this meme to end.

Attached: 1486738794849.png (645x290, 16K)

>actual internet services all run linux though
[citation needed]

Attached: 1486738720589.png (507x316, 42K)

>Azure
>a Microsoft Service mostly tailored specifically for hosting Windows Server applications
>manages to host mostly Windows Server boxes
Imagine my fucking shock.

inb4 they make an INCREDIBLY GREAT ANNOUNCEMENT that they will become part of the ~Adobe family~.

...and vanish a year later of course.

Attached: 875875_2.jpg (352x395, 50K)

You've been refuted already. You may stop posting now.

How about no?

Attached: 1456468741878.gif (142x181, 238K)

I'm a different user, was just pointing out how fucking stupid your post was.

Attached: Public-Cloud-Market-blog-image-2-640x413.jpg (640x413, 16K)

Stay assblasted.
Your post is stupid. I totally refuted him. He said almost all servers run Linux, I showed a LOT of them don't.
>b-but it's azure
Nice grasping at straws, faggot. Stay butthurt.

>no u
lol

Loonix shitposters get #REKT already:
computerworld.com/article/2467824/windows-pcs/idc--windows-dominates-linux-in-servers--not-just-the-desktop.html
computerworld.com/article/2469469/network-software/windows-widens-lead-over-linux-in-the-server-market.html

If Windows really have that server market share...
computation is fucked up.

>2010

Oh, lol.

>p-please get rekt
>please be butthurt

Attached: 1488838845373.jpg (375x500, 95K)

t. NEET, never had a job, never walked into a business data center
Feel free to post a more recent source. Thus far all you've done is shitpost, but only we posted sources.
You're embarrassing yourself.

>a lot = most
There's where your story falls apart mate.
w3techs.com/technologies/overview/operating_system/all

how does this chart prove anything?

FAKE NEWS

Your chart is about people running that particular piece of software
>Fully 87.7% of the physical servers and VMs in the Spiceworks network (which are mostly on-premises) run Microsoft Windows Server.

community.spiceworks.com/networking/articles/2462-server-virtualization-and-os-trends

>which are mostly on-premises
on-premises all windows, yes

Those are web servers only though.
Feel free to find a better way to sample on premise servers, faggot.

IN
THE
SPICEWORKS
NETWORK

Are you trolling or just a brainlet Pajeet?

t. retard who doesn't know how an operating system should work appropiately.

Well, for one filepickers should show thumbnails.

(You)

Attached: (You).webm (1280x720, 955K)

You right, my bad.
>As of Apr. 2017, ~66% of web servers run some form of Linux
>As of Nov. 2017, 0% of supercomputers run Windows
What other servers would you like to include?

We are talking about servers, fucking retard.

>Bar graph goes up to 120%

Attached: 1520020578867.jpg (319x319, 79K)

>0% of supercomputers run Windows
Says who?
Zero percent of the TOP500 supercomputers run Windows, but that means shit. I personally have seen loads of supercomputers running Windows. You simply can't do a lot of scientific computing without Windows-only software like Statistica and Minitab.
>What other servers would you like to include?
How about, directory servers, groupware servers, database servers, etc.? Stop cherrypicking categories, faggot!

Leave it to faggots running Windows to be unable to count to 10.
>1.01
>2.03
>3.0
>NT 3.1
>95???
>NT 4.0
>98???
>2000?!
>ME (what the fuck?)
>XP (these aren't even numbers...)
>Vista
>7 (thank fuck, back to numbers
>8
>8.1
>10 (fuck.)

Werks in my machine

>F-fucking spic/beaner

Imagine that a fucking beaner is less stupid than you.

Attached: Screenshot_20180407_214841.png (1135x618, 128K)

Alright then, let's see your data on directory servers, groupware servers and database servers.

Believing decade old Memes that got fixed in less than a month.

Same thing happens in windows but guess what... Wait until the creator update arrives hahaha cucked nigger.
Based moreno

Attached: grossman_joi.png (1920x796, 1.2M)

Azure is easily the worst cloud service provider. I use it every day at work, and it's pure cancer.

>the majority of smartphones
You mean entry-level smartphones.

Pajeet piece of shit get out

Are you 12 or something? Apple sold servers for ages.

>On-premises
> on desktops
I think you're confused here, lad.

thumbnails and theatricality, powerful agents for the uninitiated.

It’s far from the end but if normals keep jumping the gun on it inviting unwanted regulatory attention, this.

Attached: 5FE8A123-EAF9-4024-98B6-1D139CC1E1FE.png (500x500, 14K)

Regulation has zero impact on the long term prospects

>Data: InformationWeek 2015 Windows survey
top kek

not being subject to control of any institution or government was Bitcoin's thing tho

>Taxation on sells has zero impact on Bitcoin
>Craig Wright/Satoshi being arrested had zero impact on Bitcoin

Keep dreaming.

fetching.io

It doesn't. The graph stops at 100%.

>I personally have seen loads of supercomputers running Windows
Are you a real person? Surely they don't let any regular mouth breather who thinks anecdotal evidence on the internet of all places makes a solid argument near expensive scientific hardware.

GEM by DR

And you freetard faggots fell for it - again.

Attached: 15172932976728.jpg (600x600, 18K)

that looks ok but logo is trash

VirtualBox is very popular and growing. It didn't fail retard

sure you do, NEET

>on-premise

Netrunner web browser

Is Bloom any good? I already got Affinity Photo.

wasn't ME just a slightly reskinned and icon theme updated win98?

What's their methodology? What are they counting and not counting?

I know where I work windows servers of all stripes make up less than 20% of our on prem physical infrastructure (where I count anything rack-mounted with an on disk os that the user or technician can interact with directly). Of virtual on prem, it's lower than, 15%. This is across 4 DCs, and they're bidding is to more currently. For public cloud os distribution, windows is over 90%, but I expect that to fall fast as other groups start using aws internally more. They're moving to aws mostly because my group at the organization is using 80% of the DC space, and is expected to use at least that much of our new space when it comes online. We're 100% Linux.

>XP (these aren't even numbers...)

sorry dude. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_numerals

what number is P supposed to represent?

word
taken over by the disgusting red hat
or in the consumer space by google

no, it was an attempt to try something new and it was heavily bugged. easily the least reliable OS ever created. literally (as in the actual literal sense, not the valley girl definition) every other version of windows is more reliable. even ce.

if you fucking read the page, you'd see it's 400 you fucking mong.

>p
400, but XP is eXPerience.

So what you're saying is it's subversive by nature?

>we're going to beat software that has a dedicated multi-million dollar visualisation research team behind it

never heard of this program

>Are you a real person?
Yes, I am. It's the weekend, so people who work can post here too.

>big companies never make mistakes or go out of busines

>Statistica and Minitab
this is meme shit, real researchers just stick with the tired and true (R and matlab/octave)

Well, that's unfortunate.

Attached: hurd_mf.jpg (666x160, 19K)

Yeah, but not with a server OS. It's just plain old macOS with a gui program to turn things on and off. It's really irritating that you lose a shitload of resources to the DE and can't run it as a truly headless server. Apple really missed a good opportunity there, imo.

I have a server running macOS in my cluster (though really it's just a nas and HTPC) and I love that it's just as capable as my Linux servers via ssh, as macports has pretty much every cli program I could ever want, including all the major daemons, but I would really like to be able to turn off Quartz/Aqua when I'm not watching stuff on the TV it's hooked up to as I could save easily 20% of my ram.

Attached: 643x0w.jpg (643x402, 47K)

>Not having grid marks on the edges

>TURD
Every time

>Worldwide OS revenue
> X% of Servers run Linux times $0 per Linux installation is 0 revenue
Wow.

So after 2000 they went back and started from 390 and then vista?
You know this argument is pointless, right?
Just like that user counting windows versions.