Do women change psychologically after losing their virginity? Do they lose the ability to love if then broken up with?

literally this, i've seen some exceptions but women generally ignore everything else if you got a 9/10+ face

Yes but all this is antidotal because science is fake and women lie.

Oh, it's true it's true. She loved me and I didn't even realise it!

Attached: Ladies Please.jpg (610x537, 53K)

Yes. They're supposed to "imprint" onto the first man who they have sex with. It's called "pair bonding". That's why most couples who are virgins when they get married are most likely to stay together.
Unfortunately, society tells them it's okay to "break up" with their first boyfriend/husband and proceed to be sluts, so they never again feel a connection with anyone afterwards.

>Do they lose the ability to love
Cunts are never able to love.

>Do they lose the ability to love if then broken up with?
Usually yes, but this happens for guys too when broken up with by someone they are deeply in love with

Not as radically as they change when they start their first period.

I’m taking a girls virginity next week ill let you know

Women don't have the emotional depth to feel 'love'
they're shallow superficial creatures with zero abstract thought. Their idea of love is being comfortable and satisfied and safe.
Men fight and die for their passions, they can have emotional attachment so great they will lose everything gladly to martyr for it.
don't be a fool and assume women experience life the way you do

that's the cope not to change your shit life though

in reality ugly as dogshit obese tubs of fat men get relationships

based and redpilled

Yeah this is what I was thinking. The only people I know who are in healthy happy relationships are my parents who started dating in high school and some friends that have been together since middle school.

thats literally men you're describing though since there's no biological risk for male reproduction, meanwhile for most of humanities history a womans partner abandoning her was synonymous with death

e.g. you dont see men watching romcoms or reading romance novels, you just want to jerk off to a different porn actress every night

>Do women change psychologically after losing their virginity?

yes, eveone does

>Do they lose the ability to love if then broken up with?

depends.

>Usually yes, but this happens for guys too when broken up with by someone they are deeply in love with

SAD! Dating is a postmodern degenerate tradition.

heh, I had those moments in high school, kind of sweet memories but vaineess in the end, but that is not love, just sexual attraction and pubertal angst.

>they're shallow superficial creatures with zero abstract thought. Their idea of love is being comfortable and satisfied and safe.

so kids basically? Can kids be nurtured to fully matured beings? Same with women.

>Walt Bismarck - Wife that girl

Attached: rooshV.jpg (2000x1000, 91K)

The more sex she has the more crazier she gets. Only marry women and don't even waste your seed for casual sex, they will sue you for child support.

this but unironically

women cannot truly love anything except their children

video games - do'nt count incel leaf faggot.

Only a person who had an abusive or absent mother could say something this retarded. Women feel love just as strongly as men, but it's a child-like type of love.

and another ' do you drink beer ' incel moment.

>Their idea of love is being confortable and satisfied and safe...
> based and redpilled...

So, according to you guys:

Women's love is based on reason and reality.
Men's love is based on emotions and incapability of measure risks.
Nice one, Anons.
I laugh.

there is nothing so malleable as male attractiveness. even if you will never know true chad-dom, you can work hard to be leagues more attractive than you are today.

fitness, finance, and fashion, friend-o.

Wrong.
when a man loves a woman he will go to no ends to fight for her. He will build her a castle.
the entire Trojan war was fought over Helen.
If a woman is a abandoned by a man she is sad only for as long as it takes for her to meet the next provider. She will never sacrifice or endanger herself, or spend hours meticulously master the craft of painting to honour a lover.

All of the literature and art of this world was created by men wanting to impress women. Civilization itself stems from men wanting to create a safe nation for their women and kids.

Women are attached to men like a large sum of money. This makes them happy and safe, and yes they are devasted when they lose it. But as soon as you find another large sum of money of equal value the sadness is gone.

They loose the ability to form long term bonds as they have more and more partners. Objectivity proven.

>when a man loves a woman he will go to no ends to fight for her. He will build her a castle.
>the entire Trojan war was fought over Helen.

that is mostly because MEN ARE MORE POWERFULL and can do that

>If a woman is a abandoned by a man she is sad only for as long as it takes for her to meet the next provider. She will never sacrifice or endanger herself, or spend hours meticulously master the craft of painting to honour a lover.

that is mostly because WOMEN ARE POWERLESS and have too much to loose compared to their young men peers and dont have the luxury of romanticism

Women are weak
Tell me something I don't know

>Women are weak

yeah no shit.
thing is not that men do all those cool shit since pure nobility, they do it for nobiltiy but they also have resources women dont have.

that is why men can talk straight and women have to lie...

lets say you as a strong man have an evil goal in mind, you can simply claim it with intimidation while women have to weasel it. both are equally amoral.

Wrong. Women are weak in body and soul. They're simply vessels to produce the next generation of men

The real answer is it's both.
The cartoon is saying that the ugly bastard thinks it's just his autism.

>Women are weak in body and soul.

yes, kind of. man can make good women strong and nobel just like parents can make kids strong.

>They're simply vessels to produce the next generation of men

yes, what is wrong with that.

Nothing wrong with it, you're off topic

leaf says it how it is

redpilled and based.

This
women are parasitic beings that use their holes as baits
men are indoctrinated since childhood to be good hosts and be pleased to be leeched

Attached: 1537668174303.jpg (1305x899, 100K)

Yes.

Feminism has divorced the concept that a woman's desire for a man is completely unrelated to her desire to procreate. In reality, women often become psychologically imprinted to their first three sexual partners, and are psychologically triggered to engage in sex with them, regardless of actual mate quality.

It overrides a woman's logical center and hits her straight in her instinctual emotions. This is why "good" girls can't stop dating dumbasses and are absolutely unsatisfied with acceptable mates that don't stimulate her in the same way that her first three did. It's why women will self-destruct a near perfect relationship to run off with a piece of shit. If she spent her early years fucking dumbasses, it's all her sexual selector can pick up on. She can fake attraction to other men, but not for long and indeed the longer she tries, the more unstable she becomes.

Virginity and mate choice matters a great deal in the kinds of relationships a woman will be able to have later on in life. On top of that, women will gain an appreciation for "stable" traits in her mates but, none of that will change her desire for proper stimulation. A good example is a decent guy who fails to respond properly to a girl's shit test, or rather he doesn't respond the same way her first three did. She will become irrationally frustrated and not be able to explain why. She'll begin behaving in such a way to distance herself from her current partner, despite there being nothing "wrong" within the relationship itself. She'll start acting out, much like a teenager who isn't getting their way.

Attached: b4f.jpg (569x428, 23K)

Who cares.

Attached: UuhdOow.gif (320x427, 2.8M)

(cont.)

It gets worse when you realize there are only two male archetypes in a female's early experience; the guys she fucks, and her dad. If you're not one, you're the other and thus a girl with daddy issues will react with even more intensity because not only have you failed her mate test, but now you're like her dad, a nonsexual entity to be sure, but one she needs constant validation, love, affection, and support from.

Emotionally, she'll rationalize her behavior by labeling a partner as "boring" or attribute it to some vague notion that her emotions have to click before she can really "like" someone, despite her being able to have sex with men that she doesn't necessarily "like". It's also why women refuse to leave the men they are unsatisfied with until they've broken the "DAD" label, often through abuse be it emotional, physical, or material.

In her mind, she can't cheat on her "dad" figure, since she's has no desire for him. In her mind, Daddy has unlimited resources and thus she can take as much as she wants. In her mind, her dad isn't worthy of respect because she was allowed to be a slut in her young years.

It's why, back in the day, a man had to be approved by a woman's father before any kind of relationship took place. Fathers often picked men like themselves. A union of the two mental constructs, reconciled is the only way a woman can remain emotionally well-balanced in a long-term relationship. She needs both sides but if she screws around, her psyche will be split between two extremes that can never be reconciled...And it will be ripe to be taken advantage of.

Attached: 1486019483068.jpg (1284x1057, 106K)

>zero abstract thought
can confirm. women know only their own direct viewpoint, all attempts at explaining a logical abstraction are lost to them. It's impossible for them to see or understand anything outside their direct wants and needs.

Emotions don't mean vices.
Emotions, in the platonic sense, are higher than the female/libertarian rationality of "cummies".

>there is nothing so malleable as male attractiveness.

THIS. 3/10 in high school 9/10 at 30

you should write an article

>one chance at life
>not born narcissist
>not confident
i was set on path of failure from birth

Attached: FaceApp_1537702253968.jpg (1010x792, 306K)

Compelling. Do you have any sauces for this or are you just recalling tidbits you picked up over the years? I mean it makes perfect sense considering the state of things, just wondering.

She's pretty who is she?

>but now you're like her dad, a nonsexual entity to be sure
You know nothing about women.

>In reality, women often become psychologically imprinted to their first three sexual partners
i would say two, or rather one

t. was the third to her

Height isn't malleable unless you get on that shit during puberty.

youtube.com/watch?v=_3mnuelIhJg

There was a study done on how many partners a female can have before she loses the ability to pair-bond. My theory holds pretty well. After partner 4, she's pretty much going to be unhappy in any long-term relationship and will rate her marriage stability accordingly. Divorce rates seem to back this up.

s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2003/pdf/Bookofcharts.pdf

Attached: 1484271403917.jpg (207x200, 13K)

Watching girls now I'd say there are good reasons our forebears cared about virginity until about 60 years ago, the long term satisfaction of the girl in question being chief among them.

Attached: 1535222775409.jpg (1466x1196, 142K)

>tfw I'm on prozac for anxiety

Then she's a liar.

She's had more than three. Guaranteed.

Women lie about their partner count ALL the time, to the point that it gives them anxiety to let a man know just how many they've had. A woman would have to trust you more than she trusts her girlfriends and mom to tell you her actual partner count.

My formula for getting as close to the truth as possible, is as follows:

If she's had more than 1 partner, she will automatically cut her count in half by default. So, 1 is 2, 2 is 4, 3 is 6, etc If she's ugly, add 1 for each number. Ugly girls put out way more.

After 10 partners, you can add 1 for each digit after 10. So 11 is actually 20 something. 21 is actually over 40.

Attached: 1512679274010.jpg (478x476, 72K)

yep, sounds about right

>Tfw I am almost a 30 year old virging in South America.
Not even gay

There is a second component. If girls are having sex and not pregnant in two years they start looking for a new mate.

Of course this is totally made up psuedo science based entirly on speculation.

But its not like scienece would ever admit such a thing even if true.

Sorry fellas, this thread has been quarantined.

Stack your cash and go on a sex vacation.

Thailand, Brazil, Venezuela, Ukraine, Cambodia, Phillipines, etc...Anywhere that women are poor but attractive. Save up around $2000 USD and you can fuck 2-3 girls a day for over a week. I've got my trip all set and planned. It will free you from the mental constraints that virginity places on man's psyche.

If you've got cash, you can even import a fake wife for companionship and procreation. Just don't actually fall in love with her, understand that it's a business arrangement, and your bloodline will survive.

Nature is cruel and uncaring but, it is fair and nothing is off the table when it comes to your own genetic immortality. Play the game accordingly.

Attached: 1480800902224.jpg (585x600, 29K)

>3

Try 15 + a black dude to try it out

>that much effort for some subconscious insecurity
You will be better off if you never set foot on any 3rd world shithole, you are already lucky enough to born in a good country you don't need some woman stinky holes to fulfill anything

women bond to their first sexual partner lifelong, even if they break up his spectre will forever haunt her. no further partner will their minds latch on to like that first one. with every successive partner, the pair bonding mechanism weakens

I am EL GOBLINO my dude so my bloodline can die for all I care.
Also, I am been infected with the virus of romanticism so sex just have sex is repulsive to me.
In my old job my former co worker said one day theybwould kidnap me and take me to the brothel I responded saying I would escape enven I had to jump from the car.
I also have a really odd fetish for this part of the world

No
Women that give up their virginity without being married were never good girls

How about you go fuck yourself incel jew. I'm tired of you jewish spammers trying to convince us to hate women instead of constructively trying to help them. Read about hitlers love for woman and the importance of the mother and love of a woman for our race. This is why you fear our love. Jewish incels need to be gassed.

something that I've never manage to find a proper answer to is that, in regards to "you can't make a housewife out of a whore," what did National Socialist Germany do with the women post-Weimar?

>Stop shitting on girls and start shitting on those who corrupt them.

Also because OP's a cunt.

Attached: pexels-photo-733872.jpg (2250x1500, 205K)

Good question.
I know they implemented a rewrd system for births.
Medals awarded to women for giving birth to X amount of children

>1 post by this id

What if a man gives her a son

Will a man phsychology change?

When the bitch has more then 4 pairs of shoes in her closest, she is psychologically unable to bond with anything or anyone. The world around her is nothing more then a trend.

Looks like she's abandoned her College Lesbian act for good. And it also appears semen makes girl's hair grown?

Attached: 1535833183988.png (412x299, 98K)

I don't have any problem with posts calling out sluts (of either gender) - hedonistic sluts might be fun to fuck but they're an evolutionary dead end.

I do have a problem with mgtow-tier whiney hypocritical manchildren who place all the blame for their incel status on wimmin and either don't have the self-awareness nor the emotional fortitude to bear some or all of the responsibility themselves.

This upcoming generation has a lot of growing the fuck up to do.

Attached: pexels-photo-712513.jpg (2250x1500, 188K)

bamp

>what did National Socialist Germany do with the women post-Weimar?

lebensborn

HELLO JOAN, INTERESTING CHOICE OF BAIT

Attached: hi_joan.png (851x324, 120K)

I have heard that it is actually the first time a guy nuts in them. Their body responds to semen and makes them want to keep the guy around to help care for the baby.

Women are incapable of love in the first place. But their pairbonding instinct weakens with each subsequent partner.

A virgin will still leave you once she has the opportunity to do so.

The best indicator of sexual promiscuity and unfaithfulness in women is testosterone levels.

Attached: C0B18B5C-BCDB-4520-A225-49541152E857.jpg (225x225, 18K)

>This upcoming generation has a lot of growing the fuck up to do
Gen z here. I just want the collapse to happen already this world is so gay

Gen x here -
>he didn't live thru the 80's and the constant background fear of Kruschev/Brezhnev/Raygun going drunkenly or dementia-riddled to the Big Red Button and sending us all to a nuclear inferno

Still doesn't make blaming women for everything ok. Just marks you as immature. Which is probably why to any grill with an ounce of self respect and self awareness why they stay the fuck away.

Attached: beautiful-beauty-beautyrobic-917656.jpg (7680x5120, 2.7M)

>I do have a problem with mgtow-tier whiney hypocritical manchildren who place all the blame for their incel status on wimmin and either don't have the self-awareness nor the emotional fortitude to bear some or all of the responsibility themselves.

mgtow are very different from incels, but both have the same conclussion - nihilism, defetism and escapism.

regarding responsobility, look my other posts to get the picture Im painting - its collective responsibility more than individual. Part of blame on women is legitimate, but that is not where the solution lies, we should fix masculinity first since that is what caused it, we cant blame women for having a blind spot - that is what makes them feminine, but its a thing that can be used against them/us.

Attached: family1523436950908.jpg (700x799, 159K)

>men who want to protect themselves are losers
>t. faggot

incel alert

Pretty much. Unless you get to 35 and are willing to settle for a dried up thot.

Increasingly less so. Im way more put together than a load of guys I've met, but they clean up because they are good looking.

>we should fix masculinity first since that is what caused it
I'll agree with that. Combine it with
>>Stop shitting on girls and start shitting on those who corrupt them

Attached: active-aerobic-aerobics-917732.jpg (5760x3840, 1.49M)

Well if you've got some deformity or your face is just fucked up you'll never be a 9 or 10, but if you get Jow Forums, make bank and get an acceptable hobby (music, hiking etc) you can make it to a 7, 8 if you can get your CHA high enough.

>men who want to protect themselves are losers

???

If you choose not to marry its a rational decision I respect especially considering the times but to support defetism and nihilism is smth totally different.

Look at r mgtow and subredddits they link, its hunter thompson bs and theri solution to nihilism is more nihilism.

>>>Stop shitting on girls and start shitting on those who corrupt them

I dont "shit" on women nor is my reaction to them like that of the incel community due to positions I hold that are summed in:

WOMMEN ARE A REFLECTION
OF SOCIETIES MEN

but to say they are compleltly blame free is white knight faggotry.
Even children have some level of responsobility. Significant number of women in society deserve stoning, not stoning in a fit of I-dont-get-powsie rage but stoning as, they are reprobates and should be put to death.

Only agency of society are men (agency=ability to create collective social change), but everyone has responsobilites (even if you dont have agency).
what do you think about that position?

Attached: unwin2.jpg (638x426, 163K)

>but if you get Jow Forums, make bank and get an acceptable hobby (music, hiking etc) you can make it to a 7, 8 if you can get your CHA high enough.

how about
>discover your purpouse
>get charism
>get self respect
>become some post-patriachial number on a scale of 10 that attracts a decent women
>start a clean family

Attached: family8232944.jpg (1200x835, 403K)

>>become some post-patriachial number on a scale of 10 that attracts a decent women

and even if you dont find a decent women Ill respect you as a men and your life will have purpouse

Your mom is the only true love for any man alpha or beta. Women are incapable of loving.

>tfw attractive but being skinny takes me off femoid radars
It's a shame because if I bulked up I would be slaying. Also kek when women get bitter at me because a hot guy doesn't talk to them