Senator, we're working on AI tools to accurately detect thoughtcrime in any language

>senator, we're working on AI tools to accurately detect thoughtcrime in any language
>soon available to any government's Ministry of Love
I don't wanna live in this timeline anymore.

Attached: z.jpg (912x600, 68K)

Other urls found in this thread:

fasttext.cc/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

It's in the ToS. You agreed to it. Stop whining. That's how capitalism works.

>new AI tools
Tools are just that, tools. They can be used for good or for bad. Developing those tools is technological progress. So thanks to capitalism, we have tech progress.

Now fuck off, you fucking commie.

>You agreed to it.
But I didn't

Why do millennials always mistake private websites for public infrastructure?

>dude 1984 is like sooo deep


okay, how's highschool treating you?

epic bait

>not working on their own franchise operated quasi national entitiy
missed potential i tell ya

>It's in the ToS. You agreed to it.
I've never been a Facebook user and my concern is not about them, you illiterate twat.

>So thanks to capitalism, we have tech progress.
Progress in the area of governments' ability to control the population in order to protect their power is beneficial how, exactly?

>>you fucking commie
>hurr, I'm not a common, I'm a temporarily embarrassed billionaire/dictator
Look at this useful idiot cunt.

maybe you haven't read it user? did you go to highschool?
>newspeak
>surveillance state
>permanent war
>total propaganda now in history books in the usa
thisisfine.jpg

>Progress in the area of governments' ability to control the population
The algorithms are agnostic, you fucking moron. They can be used for good things too.

Facebook collect data on non facebook users that have not agreed to TOS how is that ok?

I read it in high school, his essays are better.

>dude, it's like too mainstream for my non-conformist contrarianism.

okay, how's highschool treating you?

The internet is not a public utility. Ajit Pajit agreed, don't bother him about it.

1984 was a pretty good/insightful book
I had to read it in highschool too. But I also had to read Odyssey. Is that shitty literature as well?

Facebook labs developpeed rather efficient tools for text analysis like fasttext
fasttext.cc/
It represent each word as coordinates in high dimensional space where relative positions tend to be linked to word relationships.
Coupled with neural networks it enable efficient text classification.
The big problem is which categories you classify to

Attached: QXF746h.png (2880x2880, 464K)

>IMPLYING YOU CAN STOP THE AI BOTNET

JUST RELAX, HUMAN

Why CIA niggas and NSA have the rights of 1984? What they did with jt?

>security camera in a bathroom is agnostic
>it can be used for good things, too
It can, but it's pretty fucking safe to assume it won't 99.9% of the time.

>classics that we were made to read in highschool are automatically bad
I guess Shakespear is bad too, then.

Modern world seems to evolve to a mix of 1984 and some cyberpunk setting elements. Orwellian cyberpunk could be called cypherpunk. Chinese government is beginning to use high technology for mass surveillance
Just imagine big brother with modern technological means

shakespeare is the capeshit of that period tho

>when you realize 1984 was a true story and Orwell is a time traveler

Attached: 1501925746714.jpg (600x811, 50K)

>shakespear

Attached: 1501377034891.jpg (480x480, 15K)

>t. francis bacon

>developing cameras is bad because they can be put in bathrooms
You are clinically retarded.

THE VOLUNTARY OVERSHARING FOR LIKES IS MORE LIKE BRAVE NEW WORLD

BUT THERE IS PLENTY OF 1984 IN THE MIX TOO

I believe brave new world was supposed to be about the USA and 1984 more about the UK

>when you realize the "war on terror" is literally the war in EurAsia

Consider also the corporation dominated world setting of cyberpunk genre. The nightmare future seems to be aimed to.

>THE VOLUNTARY OVERSHARING FOR LIKES IS MORE LIKE BRAVE NEW WORLD
Actually, it isn't. It's only briefly touched on, by the inner narrative of Bernard, but jealousy and the destructiveness of feelings is the main motif.

>It represent each word as coordinates in high dimensional space where relative positions tend to be linked to word relationships.
So they're using SVMs?

>When you realise he also went by the alias of John Titor

ITS A MAJOR ELEMENT OF THE CURRENT DYNAMIC NOT PRESENT IN ORWELL BUT PRESENT IN HUXLEY

>developing large-scale AI tools that will _certainly_ be used for mass surveillance is good because they might _potentially_ help categorize porn on my thinkpad as well
You are clinically retarded.

You strike me as the kind of person who thinks "Mockingbird" was about how harmful false rape allegations can be.

Dont be silly user you were born in the perfect timeline to fight this tyranny

Zucc approved of something being open source?
He truly is //our/g/uy//.

What was To Kill a Mockingbird about besides "white men ruin black people's lives" and false rape allegations?

Not that user.
We already have quite advanced AI-supported mass surveillance, user.

It's an easy enough mistake to make considering the state itself is just a big corporation and "rights" are just a glorified end-user agreement.

It's a coming of age story, where Scout grows to see the blatant hypocrisy in 1930s southern states. It's not only about Robinson, but also how she views Boo Radley.

Unlike what modern SJWs try to claim in order to get the book banned, the book doesn't even imply that the false rape allegations are bad, because it's pointed out that quite clearly that she (I don't remember the name of the character, but the daughter) is a vitctim of poverty too. It's heavily implied that she is forced to work and doesn't even have any meaningful relationships with any other than her immediate family (she doesn't even understand what a "friend" is).

why are you responding to bait you fucking faggot?
all you did was expose yourself as a communist sympathizer

Hur dur terms of service negate your God given rights and also bill of rights????

>TOSnigger

>his essays are better
>that means the book is bad
ok so you're just incapable of reasoned thought
cool

It's not linked to svm it's just that each word is represented by a multidimensional vector, a big array of number, something like 300. These vectors are constructed by analysing word relationships in phrases in a big bunch of texts, they often use Wikipedia

>God
A delusion.
>innate rights
Another delusion.

>build landmines
>try not to think about children with one leg during lunch
>crying youself to sleep every night
>"T-tools are only tools! They c-can be used for good or for bad.. AMIRIGHT?! !"

if those children hadn't violated the NAP they wouldn't be legless

They assume everyone uses Facebook, because that allows them to pretend everyone has agreed to the TOS.

everything is U.S. , fucking retards.

Most retarded comparison ever.
You don't invent landmines. You invent explosives. Explosives have good uses and bad ones. Landmine is a bad use
AI is the explosive

>So thanks to capitalism, we have tech progress.
No we don't. Everything all the major tech companies make use of was made in Universities and government labs.

>AI is the explosive
And the application of AI to detect thoughtcrime -- what Fagbook is doing -- is building landmines.

Yeah zuck knows that everyone got a useful idiot friend who will bring everyone else into the dragnet.

>when WWIII is in 3 weeks

>tfw you realize that george orwell and aldous huxley were friends and brothers in masonry and were just writing about the plans that they already knew for human society

Attached: evil-3.jpg (1280x720, 85K)

>there are people here defending kikebook
Neo-Jow Forums is dead

>It's in the ToS. You agreed to it. Stop whining. That's how capitalism works.
You'd be absolutely correct if it wasn't for the fact Facebook literally affects EVERYONE unless you're a friendless hermit living in the mountains with no electricity. And even then some retard tourist is going to take photos of your home and put GPS data on the photo he'll gleefully upload to 5 social networks and pinpoint your face on the photo as well, at which point Facebook will have created a shadow profile of you, your living conditions and near-exact location. It's not opt-in and you can't opt-out.

Then Facebook is a monopoly that should be broken up.

Not saying that isn't the case, but hardly for any of the reasons in the post you replied to.

This. There isALWAYS a war just like in 1984. I forget, what was the point of the wars in the book? 1984 is 100% factual.

Yeah and if capitalism didn't intervene, computers would still be the size of a room and still be only in universities.

this is literally impossible

all we have to do is keep making up insults like google or roodypoo, eventually they'll either censor actual brainwashed good goys by accident or perma ban everyone they can't control aka it kinda defeats the purpose

this is just to keep the goym from realizing what they are truly doing with AI, like voice modulators to sound just like the real person and 3D recreation of people that looks just like the fake assange interview

why did he started every sentence with
>senator

Attached: maxresdefault[1].jpg (1280x720, 132K)

Delusional rambling. Facebook has zero impact on my life. I don't have one and the only time I interact with it in any way is my mother showing me dumb animal videos on her laptop.

>I forget, what was the point of the wars in the book?
To keep the populace focused on a faux enemy rather than the enemies at home.

Pure contrarianism. Public opinion is turning against it, therefore it must actually be good somehow because the majority is always wrong.

Your argument still supports the OP. The photo you upload is yours according to Facebook.

Because it's respectful and he was told to do so. Some of them even commented that they really appreciated it.

One does not joke about agreeing with capitalism, it's a serious disease

>It's in the ToS. You agreed to it.
I never used facebook.