How does this image make you feel?

>you can't call yourself Jow Forums until you're a cuck to some shitty codec

They're literally the anti-cuck codecs. They respect your freedoms.
Vorbis is fine too, but opus is basically better in every way.

Source on that?

It doesn't actually upsample, it stores it as a 48kHz file, so it's sped up, and plays it back slower, so it's played at it's original speed
The drawback is that not every decoder will recognize that the file is 44.1kHz and can be played faster, so you have the option to resample so it will just werk everywhere
For real time you have to resample though

No, Opus will actually resample it. I don't get why people treat that as a big deal, though.

why opus when AAC+ is far superior?

It isn't

>Literally inferior quality
>Cuck licensing
What? Why on earth would you use AAC ever?

I feel like you are spamming this everyday and nobody GIVES A FUCK!

Seems like you do actually

gib heavily filtered AV1 DVD rips

>How on earth can you even call yourself Jow Forums?
I am a resident of Japan, we have other local brands. :(

Attached: rk_banner_02.gif (300x100, 10K)

wait until hardware acceleration comes

ENGORGED

Just wait for the av1 yify

>x265 takes 0.65 of x264 on average
>av1 takes 0.65 of x265 on average
>the new a:10/v:10 rips will be only 0.42 in size of the previous gen
>expect 700MB cd-sized 1080p movies

The good, the bad, the ugly.

This guy doesn't look like a Kimura Ryuji.

>the new a:10/v:10 rips will be only 0.42 in size of the previous gen
A 58% reduction in file size isn't really "only".

when though? 5 years from now?

what a terrible graph

I would rather see 2GB with higher quality 1080p movies instead or maybe 4GB 4K.

>Opus
>AV1
Y E S
>MKV
eh

Opus has timing issues in mkv.

On the other hand android will only play opus audio if it's in a mkv.

name 1 container better than mkv

Resampling can create unwanted artifacts
And audiophiles absolutely despise anything that can affect quality

Mkv is objectively flawless and makes every other container obsolete.

Wrong

>audiophiles
>lossy codec

sheeeeeeeiiiiit

Free.

Attached: richard-stallman-100586957-primary.idge.jpg (620x413, 107K)

It isn't, it's full of flaws and weird shit, but overall it is better than everything else out there

gay

The future is bright and soon all of my media will be free.

Android will play opus if you name it .ogg

Name one thing that directly affects you

Integer playback speeds

>opus
>not FLAC

Erect

>matroska
DivX's Russian cousin. Decent for what it did back in the day. Has it been maintained?
>opus
Yet another audio codec? Patents on mp3 expired.
>AV1
>>blocks your CPU
How the designers think a power hungry codec is going to work well on mobile devices is beyond me. Exotic compression schemes have been tried time and again, and they have all failed.

While a codec is in open development the focus is on code clarity, not performance. The encoder is not even multi threaded yet.

Impressive how everything you said is wrong

>DivX's Russian cousin.
What are you on about? DivX is a codec, not a container.

>matroska
>Has it been maintained?
Yes.
matroska.org/technical/specs/index.html

>opus
>Yet another audio codec? Patents on mp3 expired.
MP3 gives terrible compression. Why would you want to use it?

>AV1
>How the designers think a power hungry codec is going to work well on mobile devices is beyond me.
What makes you think it's particularly power-hungry? There's no sense in comparing a prototype-stage software encoder with mature hardware encoders.

>hardware encoder

Attached: 1490050963760.png (327x328, 188K)

great but nobody will adopt these anyway

>caring about encode time

>Resampling can create unwanted artifacts
Not if you're using a good encoder. This is a solved mathematical problem.

>hardware encoder
Fine: "A well-optimised encoder that makes use of specialised hardware features".
You knew what I meant.

>DivX's Russian cousin
>codec
>container
WHATS THE DIFFERENCE LMAO?????

Attached: 1521406461418.png (1080x1080, 127K)

It already takes days to transcode a series to HEVC, I'd rather that not take even longer

I'll bet you I can resample back and forth between 44.1 khz and 48 khz over 1000 times and give it to an "audiophile" and they'd still cum their pants just because it's 24-bit flac. The effect of upsampling is negligible with modern software. It's not a real issue anymore.

We're not discussing lossless codecs here by the way. Opus is a LOSSY codec, expect loss. You want bit-perfect audio? Use a lossless format in the appropriate sample rate and bit depth for the source audio.

Matroska and Opus are already widely adopted though

Other than Youtube, where is Opus used?

Lmao you can probably do that with a youtube rip. Gotta be 24 bit flac though. Self proclaimed audiophiles are all bugmen, they eat that shit up. If there's something vaguely resembling a whiff of "high quality" about anything they invest their time or money in, it means they're intelligent for doing it.

literally every VoiP service

They're not shitty at all. Opus sounds good event at 64k if you encode from flacs.
You seem to know what you're talking about. Why does libvorbis is better than vorbis? They're the same codec, r-right? trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/HighQualityAudio

This.

muh discord

Do you think the videos you record with your phone are software encoded?

Uh, no, that's not how it works.