This thread is about the appreciation of horology, as well as the micro-engineering and materials engineering that are required to make a fine watch, clock, or other timepiece.
At least is something different from the everyday SHIT.
Adam Price
>>non tudor or casio op windyknob here, even I was tired of seeing so much repetitive OP shit I had to switch it up, I also linked my favorite informative video as the video for newbies as a bonus, everyone should unironically watch it and discuss a bit here
Unfortunately it's back to black. I haha working on Saturdays, weekend's too short with 2 days already.
Jason Young
Second. Maybe look at Tissot Seastars as a cheaper alternative to the Seamasters too.
Most of them will probably be smaller than that by the way. Mine is 35mm, many are 34. Most Constellations are gold, but many Seamasters are steel if you want something more casual.
You could also look for a jumbo 28x/30t2 manual wind if you want something more unique than a run of the mill 56x.
William Wilson
>Required viewing for new people (unironically): youtu.be/nQ9_bOIj49s [Open] interesting I’ve never seen it explained like that, it looks like they made a bunch of clocks from shit in their backyards though
Blake Johnson
is an 18mm strap wearable? does it feel weird?
Charles Reyes
I have several watches that use an 18mm strap. There's no precipitable difference in feel when you're wearing it. It's only 2mm less wide...
Nolan Peterson
fantastic, thanks!
John Butler
Funny when it talks about people being confused by digital displays and not being able to calculate time as well. When these days it is the opposite for most people including myself. I find it much easier to have a sense of time with digital.
It's an alternative escapement that's meant to cause less wear on the friction parts. In practice it costs more to service and has much less tolerance for faults so it can skip beats unless it's built perfectly.
Ian Howard
It's magnetized. You can buy a demagnetizer for 10 bucks on eBay to fix it.
Ethan Long
No it's designed to do it. I usually hand wind a bit to get it going and then wear it to do the rest of the wind.
Ian Allen
I understand TAH Heuer is generally frowned upon, but are their chronographs that bad? I figured a brand with that much racing heritage will at least make a decent chronograph. Also, why do they keep TAG in their name? I think they’d sell better if they went back to just Heuer.
Andrew Morales
They're considered bad just because they are ETA movements in cheap cases, and the styling is clearly trying to appeal to 50 year old men who like watching car racing.
The chronos are probably fine, but for the amount you pay vs the cost of the parts used it's not such a good deal.
Ryan Ramirez
Some heuers are great, at least. Haven't looked into the movements in the new monacos though.
Is this the ultimate tool watch modern tech can deliver?
>not overly expensive (i.e. relatively replaceable) >built like a literal tank >rated to 300m but a real-world example survived over 3,000m >quartz, with all that implies (inherent accuracy, antimagneticism, shock-resistance, ...) >high-tech quartz (metal structure, 7 jewels, high-torque, dual rate trimmers, battery lasts 5 years officially, ...) meaning more robust and durable than cheap plastic disposable quartz movements >analog, not digital display; meaning the lume allows for immediate readability in dark without need for a button push (and battery drain) >horological merit out the ass (long history, designed to be the best saturation diver with modern tech, the seconds hand actually hits the second markers, ...)
It's even very wearable thanks to the short lugs. Pic is a 7" wrist.
Best of all: it's a unique design; one that no-one will mistake for a Submariner homage.
Isaiah Rivera
Yea I plan to get one myself at some point as well. I do however still consider it lower on the tool watch ranking then g shock. I don't think it could take a beating as tough. I would also put Victorinox as a good tool watch. Sinn also probably has some model in their range that is very rugged.
The bracelet on those chink fakes is shit, I say orange nato.
Jack Davis
>analog, not digital display; meaning the lume allows for immediate readability in dark without need for a button push (and battery drain) Lume is inferior to led / el and you know it.
Dylan Wilson
Explorer.
Jack Sullivan
No. You either have to push a button, or tilt your arm a certain way, after which the illumination only last a second or two.
Knowing the mental effects of certain diving hazards, having an always-on analog display is superior.
Michael Perry
>I do however still consider it lower on the tool watch ranking then g shock. I don't think it could take a beating as tough. I think it probably could, but the reality is that a g-shock is much cheaper to replace so you don't unconsciously baby it as much.
Also, due to the nature of plastics I'm not sure if 300m g-shocks could exceed their depth rating by the same margin as a 300m Tuna (which survived until well past 3,000m).
Ryan Nelson
Anyone have experience with miyota 8n24?
Ryder Taylor
It is true that if a watch is under $100 and replaceable I don't think about it, which is a good thing. And if we are talking depth rating sure Tuna wins. But are we talking about the best diving watch or the best all around tough beater?
Jackson Sanchez
Tank Solo it is.
Chase Rodriguez
Sounds like Han's obese brother.
William Butler
Well there are many different kinds of beatings, thus there are many different kinds of beaters.
The Tuna tends more towards the lifelong companion/diver spectrum of beaters.
Alexander Lee
I just brought this from a chinese website for 3 dollars, I like the retro style with leds and shit.
Are there more watches similar to this style retro/80s? from casio or other brands, I love the style.
The 1000m Tunas (auto and quartz) were on the bathyscape that went down 3000+ meters, and a primary reason why is that they don't have a caseback. I doubt the 300m tuna would be able to triple its rated pressure with just a gasket and a screwdown caseback to deal with the giant hole in the back.
I would be recommending the Darth Tuna to everyone, but it loses the ability for easy or even DIY battery replacement. IMO, self-maintenance is a worthwhile trait of a true 'tool.'
While wearing it on your wrist? Damn, G shock owners must be masochists. {sarcasm}
When considering the extent of damage and negligence with proper use (wearing a watch on your damn wrist), both should take nearly everything you throw at them. I'd only posit that the Tuna has better and longer lasting strap options than a G.
Different strokes I guess. For most of its history the Daytona was always the inferior choice to the Speedmaster. Rolex desperately wanted to have the Daytona be the official moon watch, they even gave it the aspirational name "Cosmograph", as in "chronograph for use in the cosmos". When they lost to Omega's speedmaster, they had to shift focus to car racing, hence "Daytona".
I also think the Daytona looks like shit compared to the Speedmaster. Better movement and fit&finish though.
Cooper Rodriguez
Because while it's not a good looking aesthatically it's much better made and some people do like the look of it. Also some people really don't like winding their watches by hand for some reason.
Mason Evans
>Also some people really don't like winding their watches by hand for some reason. I have enough daily routines as it is, thank you very much.
Charles Howard
So this guy is selling SARB033s on ebay for $20 AUD. I decided to cop one, knowing it's almost certainly fake. This is all good right, as eBay's buyer guarantee will cover me if it is?
So worst case scenario - I get no watch and my money back, best case - I get a cheap (probably stolen) watch?