2018

he just installed an addon.

zdnet.com/article/chattanooga-the-first-10-gigabit-internet-city/

see

Nah, he'd have more download bandwidth if that were the case. And ping would be 0ms.

More likely a datacenter or enterprise server room testing to a nearby server on a 10gbps link.
That would explain the 5000mbps download speed if we assume the speed test server is open to the public on a 10gbps link.

Upload is obviously better since most people have paltry upload speeds to the server is able to easily push 8000mbps.

Inspect Element?

If it's actually Chattanooga's fiber you could easily prove it, you haven't yet though.

Post a result from the last hour, even just the result ID would be enough proof.

For what purpose? 1gbps is nothing special these days.

Attached: 2017-06-28 16_17_47-6413520654.png (350×200).png (352x202, 14K)

>faster than 99% of the US
>nothing special
North American internet as a whole is terrible compared to even 3rd world countries

I know, I know (cries)
But hey it could be worse

Attached: Screenshot_20180422-230114.png (1080x298, 34K)

I could get 2gbps if I wanted.

This speed is available to around 4 million other Americans living in the North East as well.

>North American internet as a whole is terrible compared to even 3rd world countries
Unless you live in a rural area, you should have access to at least 50mbps.
I've got 300 through comshit.

>1gbps is nothing special these days
;_;

Attached: 7249797326.png (350x200, 20K)

Guess 90% of Yuro countries are 3rd world.

Attached: speed.png (553x2137, 86K)

>Germany isn't even on the list
We truly are a third world country

well

Anyone have Charter Spectum? Do they do FTTH? How are their upload speeds?

Attached: maxresdefault_9.jpg (1280x720, 108K)

They do fiber to the node, not home. Their upload speeds are shit.

>soooonniiiiicccxxxxxxxx.mp3

why does it have to be like this

Attached: 1353826125554.png (433x551, 92K)

basedboys

And Italy is even worse than Germany, believe me :)

>tfw no water for 3 days
>need to go stay at mom's for the weekend
On the plus side its beautiful as fuck here (rural Western WA state). On the downside, pic related.

Attached: hugs net.png (767x211, 34K)

>tfw FTTH @ 30 Mb/s down / 3 Mb/s up
>also CGNAT
life is suffering

>2018
>still using wires instead of the glorious wireless network

>sneaks over to your neighborhood's box
>grab fibre optic cable
>do pic related until I hear a crunchy noise
>whole neighborhood's internet access dies in a femtosecond
>will take the ISP a day to come to the rescue, and an entire day to find and fix where I did pic related
The absolute state of data transfer technology

Attached: bend-radius-of-fiber-optic.jpg (560x416, 24K)

Where the hell do you live that an FTTH neighborhood node would run fiber in the clear?

All the installations around me run through underground conduit to the node, then back out in underground conduit to the houses.

If you wanted to trespass on all your neighbors property you could go by house by house and do that, but at the node level there should be no accessible fiber unless you've got the keys to the cabinet.

Faster than Sanic

Wow, Seattle's fucking pathetic.

found the cia nigger

The whole meme about USA shittybinternet needs to end. Unless you live in the middle of nowhere 500mbps is like under $60. It's not 2007 anymore.

As if, i'm in Maryland, if anything i'd be an NSA nigger.

Places like that are nice for fucking off to, but not full-time living.

to be fair, i am on the other side of the sound in bremerton.
living in the barracks

shit sucks

f-feels good being aussie

>emu attacks your node

This seems to be quite common in the UK.. In areas where BT phone lines were run on poles, the fibre roll-out strategy seems to be mostly to run fibre on those same poles..

Pic related: A pole-mounted BT/Openreach fibre splitter.

Attached: naked-fibre-splitter.jpg (1200x1600, 1.63M)

>be asshole
>ruin everyones day

haha technology amirite??

It's a lot cheaper that burying it. This is one of the problems with fiber deployment in Burger World, most utility poles are privately owned and nobody wants anyone else to attach to them, and burying lines would cost too much.

>fiber to the curb
>last meters use 50 year old phone wire

>100Mbit

>This seems to be quite common in the UK.. In areas where BT phone lines were run on poles
which is a pretty big distinction, I've only ever seen bt use standard cabinets even in the backwater parts of my already backwater city
I also seem to remember that when bt used to run phone lines from poles that the cabling going up the pole would be protected by a metal sheath for a few metres

Attached: 2014-05-02 10.59.19 800x600.png (800x600, 1.15M)

That's pretty bad, around here everything is run underground.

That's not how that works...

That is how it works in Australia.

seriously

He probably works at a datacenter and recorded speedtest on one of his employer's servers.

I am in desperate need of some ISP competition. Paying $60/m for this, because one company ate the other and then doubled the rates. Rural intetnet is pain.

Attached: i am in pain.png (1269x333, 33K)

I pay $10 more for this in a wealthy suburb of washington DC.

Attached: dat download.webm (1060x631, 1.92M)

Huh.. Around here (Lancaster) I'd say it's about 50-50 which estates have underground ducts and which are run on poles.

I think I read somewhere that building codes changed in the 70s/80s so most new estates built after that had ducted cables, but they're apparently not taking this opportunity to revise the existing infrastructure.

Happily virgin's currently cabling lancaster, so there'll be a full ducted fibre option here quite soon.

I want fiber and would gladly pay for it, but the Jews won't allow it in my area.

What are the chances of Google expanding fiber in the near future?

>What are the chances of Google expanding fiber in the near future?
unlikely

Shit man what is that, IP tunneled over smoke signals?

I have fiber but miss good old 56k days :(

Where the hell do you live, Bumfuckistan?

>2018
>not using your parent's internet for free

i truly feel sorry for you OP

I only get 30 up /60 down. Best I can get in my area

I don't. I remember middle clicking a half dozen porn images into tabs and then clicking between them watching them load down the screen before saving them.

Attached: i_hug_that_feel.png (500x461, 31K)

Yep. Sucks hard enjoying computers and guns. World's rigged.

Satellite, so basically. At least I don't have data limits.

Yes sir. I am in fact the king of Bumfuckistan, USA.

>First DSL service arrived in 2007
>256kbit/s to 1mbit/s in 2011
>1mbit/s to 2mbit/s in 2014
>2mbit/s to 4mbit/s in 2017
>promise of fiber to the curb project next month to allow minimum speeds of 50mbit/s for most users
meanwhile, I pay $60/month for this as it's the only unlimited option besides 2mbit/s

such is suffering in the last world

oh, also the latency to most EU servers is around 90-120ms unless connected through fiber to the ISP or DSL with interleaving turned off, which is not usually the case as most wires here are messed up badly

I'm waiting to see what happens next month, but I ain't so optimistic

Attached: 7151063932.png (350x200, 20K)

>At least I don't have data limits.
Yes you do.
1.22 / 8 = 152 KB/s
*3600 = 550 MB/hour
*24 = 13 GB/day
*30 = 400 GB/month
Less than half of Comcast's 1 TB/month limit, and you have to download 24/7 to reach it.

in aus it does

But I am using fiber.

I could have gigabit for like 30 bucks more, but I don't really need the extra speed and I'd rather keep my dollarydoos.

Attached: 7250013547[1].png (350x200, 20K)

How much does 10 mbit fiber cost you?

Also Verizon was a shit when I left them.

I was on 150/150mbps for $100/month

I upgraded to gigabit when it became available, at $95/month with TV.

So I gained TV service (that I don't use), and saved $5/month.

The $70 gigabit pricing is for new customers, as an existing customer JUST gigabit would run me $130/month, but with a TV plan it's $95/month.

Just another way for verizon to pad their cable subscriber numbers.

They don't offer that, it's just 100mbps or 1gbps.

100mbps is $39.99. 1gbps is $69.99

Fuck I meant to type 100. $40 a month is for 100 symmetrical is pretty damn good.

Why the fuck is it so slow from Verizon? I get 7 megabytes/sec tops, if no one is home. My wireless card is capable of at least 300mbps, what gives.

Yeah, the price is certainly good.

For 2-3 medium users 100mbps is more than enough.

For heavy users though, the gigabit being only $30 more is pretty damn good as well.

>ping: 2ms

>wireless

Plug in your ethernet dumbass.

Also, if your wireless card advertises 300mbps, that actually means 150mbps. When they mention wireless bitrate they generally advertise simultaneous up and down bandwidth, which is unreasonable since you only give a shit about download.

Also 7MB/s is ~60mbps

Could be worse. You could have gotten stuck in Lemoore.

Sounds like a personal problem, here is my phone using verizon FiOS wifi.

Attached: 2018-04-20 22.59.48.jpg (1390x412, 69K)

What tech from Verizon? DSL? 4G? FIOS?

at least in my area (western NY), it's $40/month for 100mbps

Yeah my perception about Verizon has always been pretty bad, but I've had their internet service for a little over a year and they've been pretty good.

My first problem was right after I signed up (for the 50/50mbps plan), during peak hours speeds would drop to well below 10mbps. I did a support chat to complain about it and at they of course pretended like it couldn't possibly be their problem, and that network congestion is absolutely impossible... but then the problem went away two days later. So they woudn't admit there was a problem, but at least they fixed the problem.

After my first year was up, my price of course went up. I did another customer service chat; I mentioned I saw that the new plans are 100mbps for the price I was paying before. I politely asked if I could get on that plan, and she did to for me, so I doubled my internet speed, and they lowered my price back to what it was before. I was pretty pleased about that.

There's still some shady shit though, like them retaining root access to their branded routers, which admittedly makes some sense, so they can remotely update firmware when needed, and easily do technical support for normies who can't follow troubleshooting directions. It freaks me the fuck out though so I bought my own router (after already buying their damn router...shit)

>Plug in your ethernet
Modem is downstairs, I'll ask a technician when I get the chance
>if your wireless card advertises 300mbps, that actually means 150mbps.
I tested my bandwidth using a Galaxy Note 3, which has an 802.11 AC card, my speed reached 100mbps while five feet from the router

>FIOS?
Yes, we're talking about gigabit

Well this is with a Note8 from about 5 feet.

Also, how are you so inept with technology that you have to ask a technician to run a basic ethernet run?

Further, FiOS doesn't use modems, it's a fucking router, and you can use any router you want, you don't even have to use theirs.

Attached: 2017-12-31 10.56.04.jpg (1376x1290, 254K)

You still need their router for tech support and activation of service, so it's recommended to keep one around just in case even if you primarily use another router.

>tfw using coax in 2018
why fucking life

Attached: 7250069339.png (350x200, 21K)

>tfw installation costs 800$

On Spectrum, down speeds are actually pretty solid(for reference I live in a pretty rural area, all immediate neighbors own 5+ acres of land minimum), upload has always been garbage even when it was TWC. The Spectrum switch did improve the downspeeds substantially, though. I think prior I was limited to 50Mb/down 5Mb/up.

Attached: chrome_2018-04-22-22-36-18.png (672x232, 24K)

I'm trying to get fiber installed at my work recently.

Verizon wants $6700 to run 700 feet of fiber, across power lines that they already have permission to use, and requires nothing fancy or special.

Pretty damn absurd.

Because I live in rural area so only fake fiber is available

940gbps down and 20mbps up lolol

that's not even fake fiber, that's just straight up DOCSIS 3.0

DOCSIS 3.0 full duplex would allow you real 1gbps/1gbps, all on copper (last mile anyway)

And what about 3.1?

10gbps

You can pry my DSL connection from my cold dead hands.

Attached: 1498850232677.jpg (1024x768, 109K)

how much do you pay? I'm paying like $30 a month for this. for the longest time i was with AT&T here and they couldn't deliver better than 20 down and 2 up. The upload speeds on Spectrum are still pretty meh but I'm satisfied with what I have.

Attached: eggos.png (350x200, 21K)

That's shared bandwidth between everyone on the run. And nobody runs it in full duplex because almost everyone wants to download way more than they upload, so asymmetrical is a more efficient split.

DOCSIS 3.1 full duplex is 10gbps in both directions.

At that level of bandwidth you can easily provide symmetrical 1gbps to your customers.

I think the bill for internet is $50 or so. Also if I remember right my actual rated speed is supposed to be 150Mb/10Mb, but due to the nature of being a relatively rural area I think the node I'm on shapes traffic accordingly and just feeds out excess.
And yeah, I'm generally pretty fine with their service as far as things go. There was a two month period over the past summer where connection was incredibly fickle, but I'm pretty sure it was due to infrastructure construction since after it stopped they bumped the price tiered plan from 100Mb down to 150Mb and it still outputs higher than that, and it's been completely stable ever since.