Can a Ryzen do this?

>5.5 GHz and only 60 points ahead

I've come to the conclusion that AMD fans are the biggest retards on this board, solely by the attention they afford shitty bait threads.

Cinebench is a ray tracing benchmark which is representative of CPU's performance in both multi and single threaded tasks. You don't "buy" a CPU for CB, retard.
6 cores are ahead of 8. That is a pretty shameful result for 2700x. May I remind you that CB R15 nT is absolutely best case scenario for Ryzens?

>You don't "buy" a CPU for CB, retard.
Are you retarded? Software rendering is a tool for cg render artists. It's a job.if you need something that does software rendering fast, you're not gonna buy consumer shit. cb is just software rendering with a locked scene for comparing cpus.

You're seem to have troubles comprehending my words. CB is a benchmark that uses ray tracing as a method for determining a CPU's performance. Close your mouth, wipe dripping saliva and read again.

Ironic coming from you. Read my post again and see what I'm actually saying.

>Suicide OC to barely beat a stock 2700X.
>Delid and void warranty.
>Custom loop watercooling to keep it from melting through your motherboard.
>Now I cans play my games at 1080p.

Nice try Intel shill

Attached: Ryzen2_4.39Ghz_Cinebench.jpg (2560x1440, 239K)

I'm always amazed at the depth of mental gymnastics street shitters are willing to exercise to justify the existence of the junk their favorite company spews out.

>4 threads less and 60 points ahead
Really jogs the nog

Why are you replying to a post listing single threaded score with a picture of a multi threaded score?

Good thing Intel can count on idiots like you to stay afloat.
8700k is only better at gaming at 1080p. And a 1080Ti. And 144Hz.
The fact that it's your case doesn't make it a good investment for every other use cases.

Imagine being so poor, that computer hardware is an investment.

In reality, there is only a handful of tasks in which 2700x is superior to 8700K in performance. Shame, I'd really love competition.

Intel Shills Jow Forumseneral

Because you posted
as a reply
to
turd face

Well, I'm not gonna convince you otherwise.
Blowing up your 6 core CPU for single thread performance would not persuade you of your illness.
Better pray games don't start using 12 threads soon, because your shit will not live long when that's the case.

>handful of tasks
i.e. anything but gaymes. Nice concern trolling tho.

>5.5Ghz
>Absolute top 0.1% cherry picked housefire CPU
>Bare beats Ryzen at default clock speeds
>The absolute state of Intel shilling

Attached: 1336178 - Cardcaptor_Sakura Kero animated.gif (500x375, 997K)

Anything that remotely utilizes AVX/TSX and is dependent on cache and memory latency is still vastly superior on Intel. In a nutshell, Ryzens are only good for brute force number crunching like 7zip, POV Ray and so on.

>He requires developers to support special functions to win

How many layers of golden samples are you on, user?

*Beats Ryzen in an application that is the absolute best case scenario result for Ryzen

Yes, thanks for proving my point, Ryzens are good for only primitive tasks like ray tracing calculation.

Can an Intel do this?

Attached: poster-for-5717993206001-720x720.jpg (720x480, 57K)

I bet he can't run that for more than the time it takes to run Cinebench anyhow. It probably crashes if he runs it any longer.

Guess you have not checked a lot of productivity benchmarks then.

>Guess you have not checked a lot of productivity benchmarks then.

Examples?

Lazy fucker. There are plenty of reviews out there go fuck yourself.

Oh I see :^)
The crux of any argument by an AMD fanatic

>Guess you have not checked a lot of productivity benchmarks then.
before ryzen
>ahaha, amd btfo, check this single core cinebench performance
>ahahah, amd btfo again, check this multi core cinebench performance
after 1000 ryzen
>ahahah, check this single bench performance
after 2000 ryzen
>cinebench is best case scenario for ryzen
after 7nm ryzen
>....

>Guess you have not checked a lot of productivity benchmarks then.
>Examples?
sounds like
> -nice weather we are having today
> -citations needed.

"My transistors are on the verge of breakdown and I had to try a thousand of chips but I've finally beaten stock clock Ryzen. Another definite victory for Intel!"

No, it sounds like a street shitter desperately defending products of his favorite company by lying through their teeth and evading presenting facts.

Just wondering, I've never seen a review of 8700k on aircooling.
In fact, I'm not even sure reviewers even bother running it @ stock.
All I see is 8700k@5Ghz on liquid cooling.
Is it not allowed by Intel?

>m-muh AVX
>still loses to ebyn

Attached: 1500404640546.png (650x525, 26K)

Where's 2700x and 8700k in that chart?

Did the person which has done the screenshot escaped in time?

Attached: PicsArt_04-30-06.51.09.jpg (600x456, 78K)

in muh dick

*Even though intel still lost @5.5ghz vs 4.4ghz

as predicted

Attached: avx2.png (760x188, 25K)

Do you also predict that sun goes up every morning?

>1.44V

Attached: 1520092703583.jpg (1034x689, 643K)

no, that one I found out on Wikipedia

2700x at was running at 1.47v, what pictures do you have to post about that?

>bbbut that guy was retarded too so it's fine!!!

But you specifically commented on Intel's voltage (which was absolutely fine by 14nm specifications btw, unlike 1.47v for 12nm). Why would that be I wonder? Could you be another street shitting bum enamored with AMD's cpus?

1.4 is fine on 12nm

could you be another JUST intell shill I wonder

Lol you can push that RAM down to 14-14-14-33, do you even know how to calculate the nanosecond delay? Samsung B-Die is capable of almost 7ns.

>Can Ryzen suicide run on suicide voltage for showoff points?
Yes and apparently 2700X at 4.4/4.5Ghz outperforms 8700k at 5.5, umad?

Do you have trouble reading? 1.47v is outside of AMD's specification for GloFo 12nm which Ryzen+ is based on. Contrary to 1.44v for 8700k.

What would be raison d'etre for Ryzen+ if it hadn't outperformed his direct competitor in an application that best leverages its power?

>6 cores are ahead of 8.

>6 / 8 = .75
>4.2 / 5.5 = .7636
>.75 / .7636 = .982189
>1912 / .982189 = 1946.67
But you scored 1860

In your own chosen benchmark, you've just proven that CoffeeLake has worse IPC and multi-core/multi-threaded efficiency than Ryzen+.
Here's the evidence:
youtube.com/watch?v=aB9l12Y-KqQ

>1983 divided by 8 = ???

Wrong I'm afraid. SMT is more efficient than HT is Cinebench, but Intel still holds an IPC lead.
You seem to have absolutely no idea of what you're talking about.

Attached: 85365.jpg (1277x717, 146K)

>CAS15
>2T
Get a load of this faggot

Is something wrong?

>I don't know what IPC is

Yes, apparently you don't. Want me to teach you?

>intlel stutterfires
AHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAH

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 153K)

Where is the single threaded score?

inside your anus

Why are you so passive-aggressive? Is something the matter?

are you stupid? epyc is basically 1st gen Ryzen and is clocked lower. do the math

>5.5GHz
>still shit
Enjoy your dead failed garbage.

Attached: RR7rU8p.jpg (1904x1181, 219K)

>Intel gets over 2000 points

AYYMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATC

It doesn't work that way honey. You replied to a post about 1T score with a nonsensical nT score from a server CPU, hence my bewilderment. So please, if you do have something to say on the matter, then by all means.

Hardware canucks swapped out their ryzen 1700 for a brand new intel and got no additional performance benefits.

youtube.com/watch?v=7wOBGmxyBEs

are you running an x470 board?

...

Just to beat that stutterfire clocked at suicidal globalfires GHz and still failing lmao

That's a lot of buzzwords. Can you explain your position a tad more coherently?

Do people actually enjoy shilling CPU brands for free on an anime website?

Come on user, just use liquid nitrogen if you want to beat 2700x :-)

I don't need to resort to such extreme measures, 2700x is beaten in every instance that matter anyway :^)

have a drink

Attached: hitley1.jpg (460x457, 25K)

Not in reality.

Is this the fabled "final argument" of the ayymd junk apologists? I'm a bit disappointed I have to say.

>for free

Then feel free to post that 2700x single threaded score, which is the topic of this thread.

:-)

Your arguments aren't much better, either.
>poo ayymd etc etc etc in every post
>final argument
It's called final solution, sweetheart

>coffee lake 6% ahead in IPC from zen1
>3% ahead from zen+
this is going to be interestiog if 7nm zen2 delivers

>multicore doesn't matter
Go ahead and buy a single core CPU then.

My argument is that Zen+ is a poorly balanced architecture suited for a narrow array of tasks that do not imply complex CPU utilization. I'm yet to see something that would prove me otherwise in any way.

It certainly matters, however I'm afraid this is not what this thread is about if you paid close attention to what is written in OP.

w-we won

Attached: 1491958654249.png (653x726, 84K)

You're a bad troll. I hope you get your shekels tho.

To troll was never my intention. If you feel threatened by my arguments then please accept my sincere apologies. Sometimes it takes courage to face reality.

The topic is cinebench, sweaty

Yes, 1T CB R15 cpu performance to be exact.

ARM is the future you niggers

Attached: BTFO.jpg (879x730, 120K)