C

user
why haven't you started learning the C language?

Attached: C.jpg (379x500, 32K)

dont know how to start

Go has superseded it in systems programming

I have!
C Programming: A modern Approach is decent

watch C tutorial vids and order the book thats in the image.

its really not that hard once you get the basics, avoid C++

I know it, I have done projects in it, I don't see the appeal, languages like Go or C++ have less hassle and do more in less code, C is like asm, you'll use a lot of boilerplate and you'll spend a lot of time debugging it.

why the fuck should I

I know c++, and that is shit compared to a modern language.

haven't tried Go, but C++ is a steaming heap of shit, C is faster, more straight-forward and simple

C, Python & Java
is all ya really need to know

Change your name, fagit

go is like the middle ground between C and sepples. Low level programming, easy snytax and libraries to boot. go also compiles faster than C or sepples. Pretty imo, give it a try. Google has an online tut for free.

>go is low level
>no brackets
>no ;
>python tier syntax

>low level

>syntax
>having anything to do with how low level a language is
The absolute fucking state of Jow Forums

>>no brackets
The fuck are you talking about?

>>python tier syntax
It has everything that qualifies as a C-like syntax. You're obviously too lucky to have ever used Python.

>go is written in asm
Go doesn't go as low as your mother, but it can get the job done.

i'm missing the argument in your opinion

Only languages you need to know if you aren't a completely untalented hack are C, Assembly (for at least one architecture), Verilog, VHDL, and Erlang

Chances are you aren't truly engineering anything if you aren't using these languages.

Because C programmers are fucking stupid.

Attached: download (1).png (802x1000, 143K)

C is a disservice to intelligent programmers. It has almost 0 features that a modern and intelligent programmer uses to be productive. Since C is such a timesink, it's popularity is falling more than any other languages in the market.
C is dying and it should die ASAP. C programmers are actually retards in general. C is a small language to grasp, exactly the kind of shit that makes things retard friendly.
C has no advanced features like C++ does.

But as a newfag you are kinda in the right direction. C is for newbies. Think of it this way:
During ancient times, counting to 10 was a big deal and a person who could count to 10 was considered to be "wise".

Fast forward a few century counting to 10 is so trivial we teach this to toddlers. Now toddlers appreciate the vast "knowledge" of counting to 10 while matured brains are busy with modern technologies.

C is from stone age and the people who still preach it is like overgrown toddlers that can't learn advanced things. C is for lesser programmers.
C doesn't have delegates
C doesn't have resizable arrays
C doesn't have strings
C doesn't have string concatenation
C doesn't have namespaces
C doesn't have exception handling
C doesn't have closures in the standard
C doesn't have unit tests
C doesn't have Function overloading
C doesn't have memory safety of any kind
C doesn't prevent memory exploits and has no bounds and runtime checks
C doesn't support dynamic method loading/creating
C doesn't even have generics and templates
C doesn't have meta programming
C doesn't have mixins
C doesn't have higher order functions
C doesn't have contract programming
C doesn't have inner classes
C doesn't have function literals
C doesn't have array slicing
C has a very limited support for implicit parallelism
C doesn't even have string switches

C is a cancer that plagues the modern software industry

Attached: 1524233875090.png (600x382, 163K)

>i studied CE and I can't actually compose complex software but I still feel superior to everyone else starter pack

>imblying
bretty gud

This is very elaborate bait.

haven't seen this bait before, is it OC?

what did he mean by this?

>download (1).png

Attached: 1477416804732.jpg (2000x1859, 489K)

is this a pasta?

>C is from stone age and the people who still preach it is like overgrown toddlers that can't learn advanced things. C is for lesser programmers.
Stay buttmad.
>C doesn't have delegates
Lol wtf this shit, just use pointers
>C doesn't have resizable arrays
Realloc
>C doesn't have strings
Yes it has.
>C doesn't have string concatenation
Yes it has.
>C doesn't have namespaces
Lmaoing at your OOPajeet
>C doesn't have exception handling
Not the only way to deal with errors, buddy.
>C doesn't have unit tests
Test your shit while you're writing.
>C doesn't have Function overloading
Pajeet pls
>C doesn't have memory safety of any kind
Memory safety is for niggers and children.
>C doesn't prevent memory exploits and has no bounds and runtime checks
See above.
>C doesn't support dynamic method loading/creating
Because C does not have methods?
>C doesn't even have generics and templates
Because C does not have methods?
>C doesn't have meta programming
Yes it has, read the definition of meta programming.
>C doesn't have mixins
Because C does not have methods?
>C doesn't have higher order functions
Hello pointers, we've met again.
>C doesn't have contract programming
Yes it has.
>C doesn't have inner classes
Because C does not have classes?
>C doesn't have function literals
Because C does not have methods?
>C doesn't have array slicing
Easy to write from scratch, but if I'm not wrong there's a library that does that.
>C has a very limited support for implicit parallelism
Thanks to intel we have really nice libraries that do all the dirty job on compile time
>C doesn't even have string switches
Hashing is faster.

Nice blog, faggot.

>Memory safety is for niggers and children
audible kek

Attached: 1519171282207.jpg (229x221, 11K)

This is even worse than the openbsd pasta

He's professing his homosexuality as he has finally come to terms with it.

I learned it years ago.

all of those things you listed is the reason why C is not brainlet friendly, not the other way around.

>avoid C++
wrong