Intel Optane 905p, up to 960GB

>intel specific
lol, level1 literally said optane works better on AMD hardwarwe

thanks, faggot

Attached: Screenshot_20180503-011345_Clover dev.jpg (1440x2876, 884K)

let me know when it has a lifetime anywhere close to that of an SSD.

Why the hell is anything your suppose to read a transparent png? its fucking cancer and isn't the first time someone has posted that bullshit

>Phoneposter

>2600 MB/s read
>2200 MB/s write
>480 GB
>$600
*farts* *inhales* THE STATE OF INTLEL

it actually lasts considerably longer than a ssd

>intel ssd
>good
Pick one and only one.

quality shitpost

newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820236158

This is literally faster and it's $260
WHAT ARE THEY THINKING?

you know that 80% of the time random read/write speeds are more important right?

did you see that the optane product now says "SSD"?
Those fucking jews said that it's something completely fucking different a few months back.
They even convince inteltards that they current platform needs an upgrade to support this shit.
intel is a fucking trainwreck. Good job on the fags that keep the cash flowing.

Care to post some SSD benchmarks or something?

Yeah, but problem is that Samsung's NVMe are pretty close on IOPS.

This whole Optane thing was supposed to be halfway between NAND and RAM in terms of speeds AND latency, this is how they hyped it up a few years back.

And now we're left with slightly better IOPS than the fastest SSDs, slightly longer endurance and actually worse sequential speeds. All this for double the price.

if samsung rumps up the production on slc nand, and produce pure slc ssd products, they are going to obliterate the 3dxpoint meme.

why not build an HBM based pcie ssd complete with heatsink and fan?

It has better low QD speeds and way better I/O consistensy.
SLC NAND won't be bit-adressable, i.e. slower where XPoint matters.

Why is Jow Forums so retarded when it comes to the actual tech that is not fucking phones?
HBM is DRAM.
It's a *volatile* memory you drooling brainlet.

>implying SSDs don't have RAM

Absolutely. I'm planning to buy one soon as a luxury item coming from SATA. I tried a laptop with nvme storage and shit opened like you were unminimizing it.

They store translation tables there.
Not actual data.

>store stuff in non volatile memory for the time the computer is off
>load everything into HBM when it turns on
>any modification first happens in HBM and then it's immediately written to the non volatile storage

>load everything into HBM when it turns on
You have DRAM attached to your CPU for a fucking reason.
Memory is memory, storage is storage.
Also HBM is pointless everywhere but throughput machines like GPUs or meme accelerators.

480 GB = 600 USD.

Lol.
Samsung 970 pro FTW

970 Pro is also useless.
Your client shit is not storage limited.

it's either storage or cpu limited

this problem can be addressed by using much more chips.

>HBM is DRAM.
checked and
actually he is right.
If you read the spec for the various RAM alternatives, there's a spec for RAM that occupies batteries to keep the data.
Also there's the F-RAM.
SLC is one field of the NAND business that companies didn't touch much because MLC and TLC were cheaper to make, market and sell.
If intel could pull the plug and release something like ram spec-wise, but non-volatile , then Samsung's safe bet would be the SLC.

>this problem can be addressed by using much more chips.
That would require much higher QD to reach any semblance of performance.
>actually he is right.
He's a dumb faggot; you don't need to hide anything resembling DRAM (FRAM/PRAM/MRAM/whatever) behind serdes.
Just attach it to DDR bus!
>then Samsung's safe bet would be the SLC.
SLC is orders of magnitude slower at low QD operations than anything SCM.

For you content CONSUMPTION losers, that is ok. But if the persistent log can't keep up with writes, it will fall behind the volatile memory by minutes, hours, ...

>Intel
no

There are very few real scenarios that are heavy on *4K* random R/W, especially in home use.

which is why this isn't meant for normies

One of the biggest memes of the decade

FLOEEEEENSSSSSS

all of Jow Forums is normies though

>$1300
Nope.
A 970 Pro comes for half that much.

A 970 Pro (or any NAND drive for that matter) won't reach such QD1 numbers.
It's a cool toy.

Who is this product for, anyway?
I can't think of anyone who wouldn't be satisfied with a 970 Pro, or even a 970 Evo.

pic related

Attached: 1525258576024.png (582x753, 65K)

For people that want a cool toy, really.

I remember going to some conference in 2014 where Intel shilled this as biggest thing since x86. It would replace RAM and HDD at the same time with more speed than God, all at a low low price point. And now it's just a slightly better SSD at a much higher price. Intel is just a bunch of fucking Jews at this point, wringing pennies from us for marginal performance gains.

I thought these were supposed to hit 9k read and write? I was talking to a colleague who used to work at Intel - he was saying 9 GB/s.

F L O E N S

Attached: Yotsuba 08.jpg (429x544, 59K)

With blue L.E.D.S?
OF COURSE I WOULD
But it c0000uld be rgb right guy0z

>have normal SATA3 SSD
>loads all programs instantly
>OS boots in less than 10 seconds
>275GB for only $85
Tell me why I would need or want this stupid Optane shit in my home PC for any reason other than waving my e-penis. Why? What meaningful improvements does it offer? Sure, it's faster on paper. But how can it be faster than what I already perceive as being instantaneous?

Attached: 1500476577126.jpg (500x327, 49K)

>JUST a tiny bit better at everything
>Will sell for twice the price of the 900P
|
|>
|
|3
|

4% of performance for 33% of power draw
What an improvement!

>twice the space
>twice the price
?

Comparing 480 to 480 GB

what? fucking intel

retard phoneposter