This is my new processor. Say something nice about it

This is my new processor. Say something nice about it.

Attached: IMG_20180503_184733.jpg (3000x4000, 3.11M)

At least its not AM-
oh...

Oy Vey

Attached: 1525348670424-g.jpg (719x720, 86K)

Nice purchase bro. What are you going to use it for?

At least you picked the non-Jewish processor.

Serial Number:
9HA4371N80538

Gaming and programming mostly. A lot of my personal projects rely on multi-threading.

That is correct, how did you find out?

That are many cores

I feel sorry for ya.

Could've been worse, you could live in Africa or something

2600 is the best purchase.
You can overclock it to the same as a 2600x.
You can beat the equivalent intel stuff and punch above your weight.
It's 6c/12t, the same as intel's top offering.
Absolutely destroys i5-8400 in any multithreaded shit.
If you're into GAYMEN, you will have tied performance with intel at any resolution above 1080p, or with any GPU weaker than a 1080ti (otherwise you'll be GPU limited)
Even if you're playing at 1080p, you're at most 7-9% slower than an intel in single threaded applications.
You also have an actual upgrade path to 7nm when it comes out, and won't have to buy a new motherboard like an intel consumer.
Also it comes with a decent CPU cooler.

Bar code presumably

i'm sorry OP

That looks like a lot of CPU for the money

Which cooler have you gone for?

I will if you tell me what those speakers are.

Attached: 1325679498240.gif (100x100, 9K)

Attached: angrymerchant.jpg (297x365, 33K)

I have a 1600 and it's amazing for music production, video production, etc.
I also hate streaming but I do it to help people out sometimes (I play a lot of smaller games where tournaments / player run events don't have a "streamer" so I just fire it up for people and record)

I'm going to use the stock for now. I have a Hyperx 212 EVO, but it doesn't fit AM4. I really just care for silence.

Sony SS-CCP300. They were from a stereo I had around and I started using them with a separate speaker amp we also had and use foam on the bottom to dampen vibration a bit. Chestnut and Walnut on the right, retro toy car on the left.
Keyboard is a Zhuque Team Wolf. Gay name, but it lets me hotswap switches, currently using Gateron Red with Canvas keycaps.
Logitech G400, Steelseries mousepad.

Attached: photo6005658886486469741.jpg (960x1280, 106K)

Wrong photo.

Attached: photo6005658886486469742.jpg (1280x960, 133K)

How poor are you that you didn't buy the 2700X master-race processor.
I'd have sold you a 1600X with Wraith whatever from 2700x if you had waited.

Not poor, I just don't really need that sort of performance. The 2600 is perfectly fine for my needs.

Very nice. I like your new processor, may you get high framerates with it. Don't forget to overclock. If you don't oc, look for fanless coolers for maximum meme.

>Wrong photo.
Yeah, the nature of nuts.

It's just that the 2600X looks like the way better option.
Overclocking the 2600 will fuck your turbo low core boost. You'll get worse results than stock 2600x. and it only costs 30$ more with a way better cooler btw.
Honestly, I bought the 2700x because it was 100Mhz faster on single core.

>guys its great if you OC it you only have 10% less frames than intel

Attached: 1523194751243.png (882x758, 227K)

>less frames than intel
What?

Also just showing off my Lalique paperwight.

I can still return it and get the 2600X, but what difference are we talking about at 1080p gaming?

t. 1080p gaymer in

or America
*shivers*

>people exclusively build PC for gaming
>people can notice the framerate difference between 160 and 155 without the use of FRAPS

>1080p gaming
Oh noes, you're one of them.
Don't panic, at least you didn't buy a 144Hz panel, did you?

No, when I bought my screen IPS only went to 60Hz and I would rather play boardgames than use TN.

Then it's fine for years.
It may perform lower older games, though.
As long as you don't have anything lesser than a 1060/rx480, you should be fine.

1060. I really really dislike nVidia, both as a company as from the fact that it's shit on Linux, but I couldn't justify the RX 480 when I bought it since it costed more and frankly had worse performance on pretty much everything I played.

Well, I guess you're fine, for now.
Just be prepared for a video card upgrade in the near future.

Sweet CPU, user. Probably a nice upgrade, assuming you had pre-Ryzen AMD or pre-Covfefe Intel before.

You don't need to overclock this yourself because it does have boost clocks that do it for you. But cooling matters on these new Ryzen's, they matter a whole lot actually.

You can see this clearly if you're using a newer kernel that supports k10temp and you make -j10 and watch the clocks and temperatures with
watch "sensors;cpupower monitor"
the 2600 will "boost" to 3.9GHz and pull back if it reaches 70C but with a huge cooler and never above above 62-63C and clocks just stay at 3.8-3.9 GHz.

I have no idea how Windows handles this, though, just tested it on Linux. btw, you need a 4.17rc2+ kernel to use k10temp

Why not getting 2600X? Better clocks and better cooler unless you're using 3rd party coolers

You just answered your own question.

FX-8350.

I plan to keep the stock though.

I'm using a X370 motherboard, performance should be pretty much identical, but I won't have that smart boost thing.

Attached: 1493649017575.jpg (960x686, 514K)

>cpu affects your fps at higher resolutions

ayymd users really are stupid

>7zip 4 miles
Kek'd.

Attached: photo6005658886486469750.jpg (960x1280, 114K)

Yeah 2600 really comes with underwhelming cooling.
2600X is better in every way possible, unless you already have compatible 3rd party cooling.

It doesn't. End of debate.
I could use my 1080Ti on my core 2 quad and yield you the exact same framerates at 4K.

Hehehe nice GPU bottleneck there m8

>X370
you'll have smart boost, that's part of the CPU. but you won't be able to do more than 2666 on your RAM with 4 sticks, so keep that in mind. though I am guessing you already bought RAM (basically, if you populate 1 stick per channel you can push much higher but 2 sticks per channel gives you that limit)

I have 2x8GB of DDR4, 3000MHz CL16, can I get that speed after updating the UEFI?

Well, that's the resolution I'm playing at.
I used to think 4k was a meme, then I bought a panel on impulse, as I felt my system was bored to no avail.
Simply can't get back to 1080p ever.
I think I'd tolerate 1440p because better framerate on current hardware.
Let me tell you, a 1080Ti garbage at 4K max.
You have to 4K high/medium to actually play.
1440p will generally half your 1080p result and keep your GPU running 100% all the time already.

I insist, what people don't understand about 1440p/4K is how much it increases visual fidelity. Taking myself as a guinea pig, I was fine with 1080p until I tried 4K.

Thinking back, it's as much of a leap forward from 320x240 to 640x480.
If there had been 144Hz gaymers back then, we'd never have adopted 640x480.

i5-3570k, still no need to upgrade senpai

Ive seen the fidelity comparisons myself but i am more a 144hz fps guy, when mid range GPUS give us the full 4k experience i may grab one and ditch my monitor, now 4k/144hz that shit is the REAL DEAL.But yeah in the meantime faster framerate is my game.

But are you gonna buy a specific CPU and monitor for it?

Here's the contradiction:
-Gsync monitor negates tearing and maintains a smooth experience below 144HZ.
-Buy High end graphics card and GPU to MAINTAIN 144fps at all costs.

See, Intel doesn't make sense unless you buy a 144Hz panel unable to Gsync or Freesync.

Nice piece of hardware, but don't you feel like you're missing out on all those Intel CPU vulnerabilities?

>Still using my X5675 I bought from ebay after years on my OC'ed i7 920.
>Can literally run anything I want on maximum settings and also do work.
Unless I can find a really cheap threadripper and ram prices go down I don't see any reason to upgrade.

Attached: 1482587610402.jpg (350x199, 12K)

literally the most played resolution baka

sent from my 1440p

People are idiots, I' ll give you that.
It takes more GPU power to gayme at 1080p/144Hz than playing at 144p/60Hz.
The problem is, we don't have any choice from manufacturers.
Adaptive Sync should have solved this problem, but (((they))) decided otherwise.
If it was the year 1998, when we transitioned from 320x240 to 640x480, people would laugh at you for not using the latter.
Guess what, it only took a voodoo 2 graphics card back then (maybe 100€) to have it. Nobody fucking cared about refresh rates.

gamers get more framerates when they don't use precise timers.

I don't get the 144hz meme
hate to sound like a console peasant normalfag saying that the human eye only sees 30something fps but I tried out a 144hz monitor setup and I couldn't feel any difference from 60

I might go with AMD on my next build i but i dont really think devs are gonna optimize for all those threads, so Intel is still the 144hz Gaming King, Gsync and Freesync are good stuff but i wouldnt pay the Gsync Premium but i also dislike AMD GPUS soooo, yeah a standard 144hz monitor is what i use.AMD its more for server side and render on CPU jobs, with an ok gaming performance.

It's not huge, but it's there. I'm pretty confident I could do a blind test between 60 and 144 and pass.

Its a whole new world man, everthing is more fluid and you have less delay in actions, this is mostly for MOBAS and CSGO esports games, i enjoy good single player games like Rise of the tomb raider at 60fps or even 30fps ultra 4k.

FUCK YOU GOY

Attached: 1492139297054.jpg (752x548, 282K)

I'm guessing you can. As I wrote, I can use RAM's rated speed with just two sticks but the same RAM and board and CPU with 4 sticks caps at 2666.

I would say there is a big difference when it comes to feel rather than looks

I don't think it is a contradiction at all
in the games you want to play well you can play at 144fps
in the games you want to look amazing you can play at lower fps but with something like Gsync or Freesync that will stop it from turning to shit

For you

>look amazing
You don't understand.
You've never played Crysis@4K. It does marvels with the vegetation and shit. It's literally a different game.
It really was eye opener for me.
1080p is never to be used again. Now, when I try, it feels like playing a shitty pixelated 80s game. Doesn't matter if it's 30 or 2Billions fps.

I'm kind of with this guy. I'd care way more about colors and resolution than high framerate.

GIB GIB GIB

Attached: .jpg (800x546, 52K)

Have to agree. I played crysis 3 on a 4k monitor and I didn't even care that I had to run it on medium-high and 45 fps. It's so fucking sharp but damn it needs so much graphical processing power.

Should have gotten Intel . YOU LOST

why are you all buying cpus with the same instruction sets over and over again?

Attached: 1504851224484.jpg (859x1024, 98K)

What would you recommend instead?

I know right? 1200p is where it's at.

Nice I got a 1600 on launch and the performance increases with bios and microcode updates was insane
Finewine

If it runs on electricity, its a botnet

I wouldve gone with the 1600x, but good job nevertheless.

I meant 2600x :(

SPARC
:^)

2600 has near the amount of overclock potential anyways so 2600x is a bit unnecessary.
Also you're welcome

Intel sells a better 6/12 CPU you should have got that.

Cheers love, damage control's here.

Attached: images.png (188x268, 9K)

And it costs double what I paid.

my 2600x does 4.25ghz @ 1.43v, good or bad?

It comes in a neat box

I want to upgrade to the Ryzen 5 2600x from the FX-6350 I have right now. Already have a RX 580 8gb before prices went insane. Good purchase!