Is this the greatest Jew on Jew violence?

>LAS
I ain't watching that random topics garbage with a word from our sponsors.

>that pic
butthurt Bryan detected

youtu.be/radmjL5OIaA?t=55m40s

Come back when memeple crap comes with a network stack, autistic niggerfaggot. Go hang yourself.

>mocking stallman

If it weren't for him, you'd have no choice but buying DLC and subscriptions for your OS like microkids do.

I disagree. Just because he was first to come up with the idea doesn't mean that it would have been impossible without him.

If that's the case why wasn't his ideas were found out by anyone else until he did?

Because the appropriate environment for the GPL-like license has been created at about the time he made GPL: there were some projects with open source (well, unix), and there were companies using that source code to make their own products and not releasing their additions.

>>Richard brings up procreating is stupid and un-needed for our overpopulated world
lmao,saying that makes him more selfish than proprietary faggots
didn't wanted to believe he was a commie but he makes it hard to deny

>Don't breed goy! Work for free instead.
He's not even hiding it at this moment.

>Richard brings up procreating is stupid and un-needed for our overpopulated world
And this is how you see the (((sperglord))). Denying someones deepest biological need and source of meaning because niggers cant stop shitting out kids. This is so fucking cruel i cant even.

Easy to say when you weren't there. I remember how things were before GNU.

>((((((>Richard brings up procreating is stupid and un-needed for our overpopulated world))))))
Only in China, Africa and large cities, though. Fucking anti-white retards with their bullshit should just stop shipping seven gorillion gibs per nanosecond to africa and depopulate cities in favor of towns and boom - overpopulation gone.
But nooo gotta shill for fags, childfree, MGTOW and other manifestations of raw autism.
This. I kinda like people like him because with such cuckoldry you don't even need actual eugenics. It gets problematic when genetically healthy people fall for their ideas, however.
Also, how is Stallman's philosophy not literal communism?
>thinks that all software's source code should be available to all FOR FREE, despite production costs
>thinks that if you steal someone's digital blueprints of their program and make minimal modifications to it, the program magically becomes yours to the point of you being able to officially publish it

I was there.

That was back when lunduke was blue pilled. He's much more pro freedom now.

RMS has never installed GNU/Linux:
youtube.com/watch?v=umQL37AC_YM
He also dislikes Gentoo.

>Richard brings up procreating is stupid and un-needed for our overpopulated world
That's stupid. For humanity to exist at least someone should procreate so it is definitely needed. And it's way better if someone like Bryan does it rather than some mudhut dwellers in Africa.

>Don't reproduce!
>Work for free!
Jesus Christ Stallman is such a communist retard. Yeah, above average IQ whites and Jews reproducing is the problem.

Come back when at least one bit of code in XFree86/GNU/Linux was written through The Holy Spirit, stackoverflow addict.

leftists are the most reddit "people" ever.
Go back to plebbit or 8"chan"

Low quality strawman.

Attached: 1520531552248.webm (500x388, 1.25M)

God, when will Jow Forums leave us alone already. It turns everything into cancer.

>be anti-profitable software
>have to resort to selling merch to survive, like some fucking YouTuber

>procreating is stupid
>our world is overpopulated (with africans and asians) so whites should stop reproducing!

Attached: (((stallman))).png (1777x657, 263K)

stalllman is the quintessential bugman.
a pathethic specimen of a male that is too fucking retarded to function as a normal person. he has no charisma, no sense of humor. his life work all amounts to trash.
hey, stallman, a corporation invented the processor.
hey stallman, a corporation invented assembly.
hey, stallman, a corporation invented C.
software that is not made for profit becomes trash 90% of the time because the devs have no incentive to work on it full time.
that is linuxes biggest problem.
if linux had gone profit driven in the 90s it would have out competed wangblows.

I agree, there's too many chinks and Indians

Man both China and India each have populations around ~1.3 billion, and they spread everywhere else because their own country's are so shit

I guess it's good in a way for countries like the US, because they just steal all their brightest minds from that huge sample size

>Fucking anti-white retards with their bullshit should just stop shipping seven gorillion gibs per nanosecond to africa and depopulate cities in favor of towns and boom - overpopulation gone.
>But nooo gotta shill for fags, childfree, MGTOW and other manifestations of raw autism.
this. it's funny how this overpopulation bullshit is only targeted at whites when we breed the less of any race.

>Richard brings up procreating is stupid and un-needed for our overpopulated world
Why every MGTOW is a fat neckberd that can't have sex even paying, and claim that we, the not that ugly people, should abstain for sex too?

>Bryan still doesn't understand oss=/=foss
>Bryan doesn't understand that you call sell GPL software as a service or in a product

Stallman himself says that it doesn't have to be gratis.
Just give the source if you're redistributing. (not required as a service)

For example I can sell time on linux servers and modify that source without redistributing or giving back upstream since I'm not re-distributing.

I can also sell a laptop with Ubuntu on it as long as I don't change anything in the kernel or userspace.

If I do change anything I have to provide the source for those redistributed binaries or source modification including to upstream kernel and ubuntu.

Lunduke thinks that he will go broke if he publishes his code under GPL and that's fucking retarded.
He made a scarecrow of Stallman without even understanding the license.
Stallman is actually very reasonable he's just a stickler for the rules though.

>work for free instead
Brainlet detected.
Look here fucktard

As a person who HATES nothing in the world more than israelies, jews and zionists, I am thankful for the FOSS movement.

Did ESR start his open source movement before RMS? I want to know.

1. It's socialist not communist.
(it requires effort to the gain benefits of the people)
2.It's not "free" as in gratis but free as in libre.
It just so happens a lot of devs donate their code to be gratis and libre but it's not forced.

Don't you even listen to any Stallman meme?
Fucking brainlet

Telling someone not to have kids because muh overpopulation is the most autistic non-argument.

What work?
Stallman is milking other people work since he left uni. He is a plagiarist and stole credits for everything he "done".
This is the man behind the "you should use MY LICENSE to protect your software".

And he make a shitload of money with donations that should go for the actual developers. Do you think that piece of lard can work anywhere?

Nice job showing your IQ level.

>RMS has never installed GNU/Linux:
Why would he, when GNU/Hurd exists?

Mainline Linux is the enemy of your freedom.

gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html

By you saying "work for free goy" you are implying that the GPL can't be sold as a product which is retarded.
Learn about the license lad.
I can legally sell Ubuntu flashdrives on amazon legally.

Only if I modify it I just have to provide the changes in the source.

No money needs to go to the FSF or Ubuntu.
Tired of you idiots..

>stallman is milking people
You're talking about the guy that refuses to let people pay for him to live in hotels, and prefers couch surfing at friends instead.

>Learn about the license lad.
Already know everything i need to know by looking at this drawing.
>I can legally sell Ubuntu flashdrives on amazon legally.
You can sell physical media of copy of the software. Not the actual software (the ownership of it). BTW, you don't purchase windows, you purchase a license to use windows.

Attached: wtfpl-strip.jpg (1200x1500, 297K)

>Already know everything i need to know by looking at this drawing.
The absolute state of Jow Forums. Why bother looking something up, when you can look at Jow Forums memes instead?

>you purchase a license to use windows
Imagine if people stopped buying chairs, and instead licensed the right to sit on the chair for a limited period of time. This is the kind of society proprietary fags want.

>there are adults in 2018 who unironically take this kike seriously

Attached: 1524332712027.jpg (1440x1080, 108K)

Is there any good reason at all to use Loonix instead of Windows in CURRENT_YEAR?

Attached: 1517493974819.png (2408x1488, 1.33M)

>Imagine if people stopped buying chairs, and instead licensed the right to sit on the chair for a limited period of time
What are movie theatres?
If you hate capitalism so much, then you should just move to Cuba already, user...

>What are movie theatres?
Not chairs. Also, you pay to see the movie, not sit on a chair.

>If you hate capitalism so much, then you should just move to Cuba already, user...
Capitalism is great. Not having control over the software you run on your system is not capitalism, it's communism.

Ask this guy.

Attached: ESR.jpg (1058x1058, 67K)

He went to FISL few years back, and ruin everything.
Imagine a fat autistic mongrel who is so attention whore that he disrupt talks to dance and trow his hipsters shoes at reporters during someone else interview.
Also, he is a fucking cunt to the staff too. He forced the hotel staff to disassemble the hotel bed and fill his gay hipster in-fable mattress to unroll his weabu futon. He went to restaurants, fill his entire plate with everything just to take some bits and leave the mess to the staff (unless you are american, take more food that you will eat is a bad thing because there is people fucking dieing for not having it to eat).
Also, he must suffer from some intestinal problem because he is frequently farting and get really mad when someone complain about it.

TL;DR
He is a huge cunt and pussy.

>Not having control over the software you run on your system
Do you have control over Linux? I doubt it...

>Do you have control over Linux?
Yes, I do.

>I doubt it...
Not my fault that *you* don't have it. You have every opportunity to take control over it, though. Also, we're not talking about Linux specifically (or even GNU/Linux), but any application.

>you pay to see the movie
Exactly. You aren't paying to just have a copy of the software. Development costs money, you know. One day you'll grow up...

actually you can sell the "software"
Because it doesn't belong to Ubuntu idiot.
It was based off Debian which means they modified it.
Also they didn't make the Linux Kernel provided yet they ship it.

The only thing that's copyrighted is the Ubuntu name and Logo so as long as you don't change anything you can sell it.
If you do change anything you have to legally change the name and logo so people don't see your product as a official ubuntu distro.

Lastly why take a image over the actual license>?
You're a brainlet face it.

The worst thing a movie can do to me is suck.

The worst thing software can to do me is rob me of control over both my system and all my data.

>Development costs money, you know
I know, and that's also why the top 100 contributors to Linux are paid to develop Linux, for example. Many are employed by multibillion companies such as Google, IBM, hell, even Microsoft.

>people choosing to license or donate their time to a project that they know is open source is anti private property

Back to middle school debates lad.

You can sell free software and SLAs and support. There are multiple companies that profit from developing FOSS software.

>Yes, I do
No, you don't. You have an illusion of control. Having the source doesn't mean shit when there's no documentation and you can't understand it. Windows is more customizable with stable APIs and extensive developer docs.
>Not my fault that *you* don't have it.
Not my fault that (You) never took a Microsoft course on Windows and has no idea of its power. There's absolutely nothing that you can do with Linux that can't be done easier with Windows.

False equiv faggot.
You are aware of the deal before hand when going to the movies.

It's just like renting a VPS running on GPL software or renting netflix which have GPL servers.
Both are capitalism and both are monetary.
You are a fucking retard arguing against something you don't even understand.

>the top 100 contributors to Linux are paid to develop Linux
And even after all that, you still don't have filepicker thumbnails. One can just assume your developers are incompetent, there's no excuse...

Fucking hell this shit is awful, literally 10 minutes of fucking shilling before anything.

>You are aware of the deal before hand when going to the movies.
Are you not when you buy software? Sounds like you're an idiot who lacks self-awareness and seems to think everybody else's an idiot too...

Nice goalposts.
The argument is that the GPL can in fact be sold as a product in distribution or a service.
We aren't merely talking about the Kernel but the actual GPL license.
You choosing to try and steer the convo away about you not understand C languange and source versioning doesn't excuse that fact that every one of your arguments are false and you lose.

That's not a part of linux, that's a part of the desktop environment.

The need to target a new topic like thumbnails because you can't face that fact that you are wrong.

BTFO BRAINLET

Attached: 1522128200520(2).png (500x390, 44K)

>No, you don't.
Yes, I do.

>Having the source doesn't mean shit when there's no documentation and you can't understand it
There is loads of documentation for Linux, you dimwit. There's literally a subdirectory called Documentation dedicated to document all the subsystems.

>Windows is more customizable with stable APIs and extensive developer docs.
Lol, no. Windows has to deal with supporting legacy crap for ages, causing the entire OS to be bogged down with hundreds of compatibility modules.

>There's absolutely nothing that you can do with Linux that can't be done easier with Windows.
That's demonstratively wrong though. I made a modification to the TCP output engine that allowed sub-MTU-sized segments to be bundled in subsequent packets, reducing the retransmission latency if a preceding packet was lost, and I submitted this to the kernel. Please tell me the last time any non-Microsoft employee could simply patch Windows with an improvement like that?

Other things I've done with Linux that I couldn't do with Windows:
- I've studied the NVMe driver and the NVMe over Fabrics driver, which are FOSS and included in the mainline tree. On Windows, there is no open source NVMe driver, they are all vendor specific. Using that knowledge, I implemented my own distributed userspace NVMe driver for multiple interconnected systems.
- I studied the mediated device (mdev) driver extension to VFIO and implemented my own driver for passing through remote devices to a VM.

Gnome is not Linux.

That's not at all what I said. Also I am not defending any of Linux DEs, they are horrible. I use Windows on my desktop both at home and at work.

>sell a GPLd software product
>your first customer demands to see the source
>no one else buys the product since the source is out in the open
you're limited to selling it as a service

>implying you can't sell SLAs
Unemployed person detected.

This is some next level larping...

>This is some next level larping...
I'm not.

The TCP extension can be found if you google "Redundant Data Bundling"

The userspace NVMe driver can be found here: github.com/enfiskutensykkel/ssd-gpu-dma

I'm sure you're able to correlate the names manually.

The mdev driver is not yet released, as it is work in progress. But pic related shows a remote NVMe disk being passed through to a Windows guest.

Also, if your only response is "you're probably just pretending", then your argument is pretty weak tbqh.

Attached: image.png (1359x1228, 305K)

>ykkel
more like KYKEL haha amirite?

I don't understand. Sykkel means "bike" in Norwegian.

>no one buys the product because the source is avail
Wrong.
People still buy pre compiled binaries.
You also have service contracts and if you want to be close to upstream you'll still depend on it.

It was the same with Bill Nye. Whites reproducing is bad because we consume more resources than 3rd worlders, yet we also need immigration to replenish our dwindling workforce.

>what is RHEL
Besides the argument is if you can make money off it.
Not if you can sell it.

GPL can be sold which is what lunduke the brainlet didn't know.

gnu.org/philosophy/selling.en.html

This.
It's the whole reason why Stallman has promoted the two terms "gratis" and "libre" for the last decade because the english language is limited in the respect of the word "free"

>some random unqualified shitposter from Jow Forums can make unironical alterations to it
>"hah! see? y-you can't just """improve""" Windows l-like that!"
That's exactly the point, kid. With Windows, I can be sure no retards from an online Mongolian throat singing imageboard put their greasy amateur fingers anywhere near critical parts of my system, because it's not for play, it's for work. That's why we have the professionals at Microsoft.
Look, I'm glad you have lots of fun with your little toy OS, tearing it apart and then putting it back together again. That's awesome. You know what, Linux is actually a great educational tool made by a college student from a poor eastern European country.
But when you're in that datacenter and you have to deliver, it's not all fun and games, son. There are things at stake. Things you wouldn't understand because you're still an edgy teenager who thinks private property oppresses you. But one day you'll grow up...

REEE THIS HURT MY BRAIN

COMMIE ANTICAPITALIST NO MONEY REEE REEEEEEE

>implying those same greasy Jow Forums autists can change upstream code without checks and balances by devs and must provide source commits

You truely are a dumbfuck.

You didn't read it, did you?

> Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that you should charge as little as possible—just enough to cover the cost. This is a misunderstanding.

Actually, we encourage people who redistribute free software to charge as much as they wish or can. If a license does not permit users to make copies and sell them, it is a nonfree license. If this seems surprising to you, please read on.

>B-B-BUT MUH COMMIES!!!
>B-B-B-BUT YOU HATE CAPITALISM AND MONETARY GAIN

REEEEEEEE

Submits to the kernel are reviewed and tested by trusted developers, with several years of experience.

>But when you're in that datacenter and you have to deliver
Which is ironic, considering the fact that Linux is used most predominantly in data centres.

>Things you wouldn't understand because you're still an edgy teenager who thinks private property oppresses you. But one day you'll grow up...
This looks like projection to me.

Also, I forgot:
>y-y-you're just a kid who don't know what you're talking about
See

Big dick Jow ForumsNU slapping the fuck out of /v/irgins today.

>Microsoft outsourcing development to cheap Indian workers and silently fixing bugs they introduce years afterwards
>Open source development is an open process based on merits and thorough reviewing and testing by trusted developers
Gee, I wonder which development stye I trust the most to produce quality code.

It's called civilization.

Attached: star trek economics money picard wealth better humanity(2).jpg (720x484, 50K)

>the fact that Linux is used most predominantly in data centres
[citation needed]

>claim that money isn't a driving factor
>federation credits are still used and several episodes are centred around shady characters needing to be bribed with credits

datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2017/03/06/linux-conquered-data-center

based stallman, the white race is finished and dying, the Jow Forumstard tears can't be any sweeter

Sure thing, deluded freetard...

Attached: 1513331931390.png (1340x1226, 275K)

>ensuring const correctness is a waste of time
Then why are /dpt/ obsessed about it?