Tfw GTX 690 and FX 9590 + 32 DDR3 ram

>tfw GTX 690 and FX 9590 + 32 DDR3 ram

My 6 years old rig still rape 2018 computers

PUR POWER

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1388x766, 95K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=9QtTNuY62cU
cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Xeon-X5650-vs-AMD-FX-9590/m355vs1812
cpubenchmark.net/compare/Intel-Core2-Duo-T9900-vs-AMD-FX-9590-Eight-Core/1014vs2014
cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core2-Duo-T9900-vs-AMD-FX-9590/m972vs1812
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Unless you're running the FX at 8GHz, a 2200G outperforms it

The only thing your rig is raping is your power bill.

>GTX 690
>rape

Attached: whut.gif (500x259, 494K)

SEETHING cucks that get their ass kicked by my 6 years old hardware

Running the latests game at 60fps easily in 2018

youtube.com/watch?v=9QtTNuY62cU

I bet it rapes modern heaters too

>fx9590
Nice bait user.

how does it feel when my 8 year old processor rapes your 6 year old?
source: cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Xeon-X5650-vs-AMD-FX-9590/m355vs1812

Attached: 1501243813317.jpg (1087x1080, 78K)

>tfw X5650 at 4.2ghz and hd 7870 overclocked to high hell
>tfw my rig can rape modern pc's in gaming and real world use while not raping my power bill and sweating me out of the house

Attached: 1465067262240.jpg (442x304, 31K)

>posts video from last year

Attached: 1385538677732.png (236x350, 87K)

also could we please not discuss my phrasing? thank you

>cpu.userbenchmark
hand yourself my dude

>anything but a 7990

kek

Kek

KEK

>x5650
>4.2ghz
what kind of peasent are you?

Attached: 30d9dd2613c725b9125a9d3720453a93.jpg (500x500, 41K)

I used to have an fx9590/hd7970, and I upgraded to a 7th gen pentium/gtx1060. No regrets.

oh i hand myself every day

but seriously with a sample size of 2,879 and 10,380 benchmarks these numbers can't be that wrong.

Attached: tZ7kkXs_d.jpg (222x204, 6K)

a peasant with a shitty cooler
used to have a ghetto diy water cooler and kept it at 4.8ghz, took the water cooler apart to clean everything and make sure there wasn't corrosion and never got around to putting it back

>used to have an fx9590/
>upgraded to a 7th gen pentium
i have some rather bad news for you my friend

you can get a nh d15s for less then 60 bucks
it's good invested money, you get some extra performance and should you ever leave the glorious 1366 socket you can keep using your cooler for a new build.

Attached: 7E1E0284ECB7430A80ACB6D83F85F218.jpg (500x694, 50K)

>literally nothing of worth has been released since

>mfw the video is older than 7 days

Attached: Pedobear-pedo-bear-29034476-500-371.jpg (500x371, 23K)

>fx9590 housefire

kek

my 8 year cpu's about 50% faster

Attached: cpuz.png (836x416, 136K)

nh d15s is around 80 here in the land of the free, and used isnt much cheaper
the d14 however is about 40 and that sounds more my speed, I bought a used server off my friend for 30$ and then sold the ram for that much, kept the cpu and hdd's, and bought an asus rampage II board for 65$, so im trying to keep overall money spent on my pc low. Thanks for the reccomendation though!

Attached: 3LwvXE1.jpg (300x281, 44K)

>overall cost 5k when they released
>still rape 2018 computers
Whats the point of this thread?

Attached: 1525684798165.png (616x599, 57K)

>i have some rather bad news for you my friend
Which is?

My thinkpad c2d cpu is a little faster than the fx9590 on single core. FX was a fucking mistake.

boy, here in the reich it costs 80€ as well, but seriously who buys hardware at regular prices? i got mine for 56€ a couple of months ago in a sale. Almost any parts for a computer are in sale once in a while. just find a good site that notifies you when there's a deal for whatever you are searching for.

>c2d cpu is a little faster than the fx9590 on single core
very unlikely

>FX was a fucking mistake
everybody know that already

>used to have an fx9590/
>upgraded to a 7th gen pentium
>upgraded

Attached: 069.jpg (600x641, 35K)

Me too, but without getting cucked by microstuttering

if you had a 295X2 then I could see the argument, that shit will keep up with a 1080, but a 690 is 1060 tier after all the gimping

Attached: dunce1.jpg (645x729, 49K)

>very unlikely
Actually true.

Attached: t9900_balanced_mode.png (403x402, 17K)

actually no
sources:
cpubenchmark.net/compare/Intel-Core2-Duo-T9900-vs-AMD-FX-9590-Eight-Core/1014vs2014
cpubenchmark.net/compare/Intel-Core2-Duo-T9900-vs-AMD-FX-9590-Eight-Core/1014vs2014

What board are you doing that on?

P6T SE with BIOS crossflash

Attached: specccccc.png (791x527, 76K)

Bullshit. I gave you a quick real life bench from a thinkpad. I'm sorry that it beat a fx9590 in single core user, but the fx series is a damn mistake.
>Muh cpubenchmark
Even in that benchmark the fx9590 barely beats a laptop cpu.

*cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core2-Duo-T9900-vs-AMD-FX-9590/m972vs1812

jesus where did you find a T9900? The only faster Core 2 laptops are the rare quads. Even the X9100 has the same bclk

Cooler? I'm asking because I want to know how the fuck you got your chip that high on 1.44v

sorry but a normal t9900 is nowhere near an fx 9590, that's just the way it works.

> I gave you a quick real life bench from a thinkpad
you gave a shitty image that could be anything, i gave two (much more reliable(in comparison)) sources that show something completly different

LC Power 360mm CLC
1.38v VTT
1.72v VDIMM
103MHz PCIe

>jesus where did you find a T9900?
Bought 2 for $10 (before s&h) from a texas based seller off ebay last year. I installed one, and have the other on lying around.
If you're brave you can get one of the x9100's for as cheap, but they might overheat.

>sorry but a normal t9900 is nowhere near an fx 9590, that's just the way it works.
Well not in multicore, but it actually trades blows in singlecore user. Both our benchmarks shows that. Now let's let that sink in. An older laptop cpu is trading blows wih a top of the line "enthusiast grade" fx cpu clocked at 5ghz.

>1.72vDIMM
Hope you dont blow that chip's IMC.

And yeah, that CLC is definitely better than the shitty little Xigmatek Gaia i have on my own X5650. Still, 4700mhz @ 1.44v is easily a Silver chip, possibly Golden.

I've been trying to get my own up at least past 4ghz (X58A-UD3R) but a combination of heat and I think the board are holding me back.

>trade blows
PassMark: FX has 147% of t9900 sc score
UserBenchmark: FX has 161% of t9900 sc score

the difference in singe core performance betwenn the 9590 and the t9900 is like the difference betwenn an i7 4790k and a fx 9590: huge (between 40 and 60 percent)

Fun fact, I actually had a Xigmatek Gaia II on a Xeon L5639, wasn't enough when I stepped up to the X5650.

I think there's the chance of having a 24/7 stable clock reduces by half every 5MHz after 190MHz FSB.

Attached: 4562.png (417x413, 71K)

Sure it is amigo. Well I guess your house fire is a fucking keeper.

i guess you are not sure who you are talking with but i'm one of the guys with the x5650, not with an fx 9590

>i guess you are not sure who you are talking with but i'm one of the guys with the x5650, not with an fx 9590
Apologies for the mistake friend. I assumed that you where the idiot who is bragging about using obsolete hardware.

STOP
MAKING FUN
OF FX
BULLDOZER WAS GREAT AND IT STILL IS
I BET YOU FAGGOTS CANT EVEN RUN 10 KVM INSTANCES AT THE SAME TIME
FUCK YOU

Well, right now my setup is 200x20 for the CPU, and the Uncore and Dram are at 3200mhz/1600mhz respectively. I dont have access to 23 as the all-core multiplier, which limits my multi to x22.

Current voltages are:
CPU-Vcore: 1.375 (1.34 windows)
QPI/VTT: 1.275v (this is probably barely high enough for the 3200mhz Uncore clock)
CPU PLL: 1.4v
QPI PLL and IOH core: 1.18v
DRAM: 1.6v

Everything else is left auto. I really need to experiment a bit with this and really find the stability limits.

The best advice I can give you is: Force 22x multi.

Thing is, if I do that, I get instability. Increasing Vcore much further isnt an option because my CPU starts overheating.

Doesn't sound like you have many options then.
Perhaps turn off HT if you don't use it as it does increase power/thermals a bit.

Youve no idea how game engines work do you?

I've tried that too, while disabling HT cuts temps by a good 15C, the fact it barely gets me another 100mhz or so on the cores isnt worth it

>GTX 690
So 2x 2GB GTX 680s. Great...
>FX-9590
A space heater. I owned a 5.4GHz clocked 8350. It was power hungry, ran hot, and was inefficient.

>idiot who is bragging about using obsolete hardware
well technically i am:

>2600k @ 4.7ghz
>OC 7970
>16gb RAM
Still killing it these days. Only now am I considering a GPU upgrade as I want to get an ultrawide.

Get on the Ryzen bandwagon, faggot. My 1500X does better in synthetic MT benchmarks without an overclock, outperforms you in every single game and consumes a fourth of the power, all on a Hyper 212 Turbo. Plus it currently goes for less. Worth the RAM premium imo. Gonna upgrade to a 5Ghz hexcore when Zen 2 comes out. And my 1050ti has more useable VRAM, outperforms you in game without good SLI profiles and again consumes a fourth of the power, plus my Strix is fucking silent.
Get with the times grandpa.

>double digit framerate
oof

Attached: 1508046965977.jpg (1462x1462, 411K)

I know well enough to say that with total certainty (also based on benchmarks).

That's a reverse rape for you.

Attached: tr.png (415x409, 27K)

My 24/7 three years stable setting is:

178bclk
3.91-4.09Ghz with speedstep/turbo
1424 7-8-7-22 1N
1.2875Vcore OUT = 1.275Vcore IN
1.2QPI/VTT reports as 1.012 in HWiNFO64
1.84 CPU PLL
1.66 DRAM
HT on
C1E/C3/C6 power saving on
APIC2.0 enabled
All virtualization disabled (had issues registering all 3 RAM channels at 7-8-7 and this helped)
LLC - off
Clock spread spectrum - off

The board is capable of 225*20, but power-throttles down to 20x if set to a higher multi.
I'll be grabbing a D15 and whichever x58 board has SATAIII + the most stable BLCK if this chip refuses to die.

>CPU 1.375/1.34
For 4Ghz? You're running right at the "Intel safe" Vcore limit just to hit 4Ghz. My chip can handle 4.4Ghz at that voltage.
>QPI/VTT 1.275
You're running the stock QPI speed. Every 5650 is rated for 3200 (6.4GT/s), and should do it at 1.2v
More voltage into the QPI/Uncore creates a lot more heat.
>CPU PLL 1.4v
Are you sure that's the PLL? X58 platforms use 1.8V as the stock PLL supply voltage.
>DRAM 1.6
It's safe to be within .5v of the QPI voltage. At stock you can run the IMC at 1.7v, but I like to use 1.66.

It sounds like you've been running more voltage than necessary and your heatsink isn't up to that challenge.

/thread

What that card takes 300 watts to do, a modern card takes around 30-100 watts to manage. I second that you're just raping your electrical bill and the noise from your system must be ear rending.

Attached: 1519294296492.gif (500x382, 167K)

My 2GB 770 still plays AAA games at 1440p constant 30fps or 60fps depending on settings and optimization of the game

I used an FX 8350 for 5 years.
It was fun while it lasted, but boy did it feel like a piece of shit CPU once I upgraded to Ryzen.

I'm not upgrading my 4770k/280x until Ryzen 2 and the GTX1280/Navi flagship release

Yeah, they suck ass at multithreading.

>FX 9590
even the 20 year edition pentium rapes your cpu in single thread mode

In power consumption maybe.
True master race reporting in: 2600K and HD7970.

Post power bill

My fucking sides

Attached: BAITO.png (1920x1080, 201K)

Well yeah isn't that the general idea, you pay for more and it lasts longer? I didn't find I really needed to upgrade my FX8150+660ti machine until mid last year.

Vishera is pretty fucking based desu, especially for $109 in box chip.

Fuck bro I'm still on my FX-8350 after five years and looking to upgrade soon but I want to wait for new GPUs and Ryzen Zen 3 or whatever comes along that is better.

>want new hardware
>tfw my 8350 works too well to justify spending money and rgb is fucking gay

Attached: GA-990FXA-UD3.jpg (1200x1600, 283K)

You're correct. I can't justify upgrading either. It does what I need. However I want to overclock but can't because of my motherboard.

FX-8350
Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3

But how am I supposed to kickstart my streaming career without a new PC that can handle playing games on high while streaming at least 720p?

Attached: ree.png (413x549, 176K)

Pretty sure my 1080Ti runs circles around your 2GB card

>Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3
Based AMD even letting you even run an 8 core on that, nothing wrong with getting a new PC for streaming, that's a real use case.

Relive, quick sync or shadowplay all work with minimal CPU overhead.

Downside is of course, compression artefacts and generally lower stream quality, but they're fine for streaming to twitch or jewtube.

Thanks bros. I'm going nowhere in life and acting autistic in front of a camera for the amusement of others is my last chance at a decent existence.

I love you both.

Attached: 1522551208393.png (689x473, 97K)

>SLI meme card
>house fire
most games don't support SLI/crossfireX so you're gonna get cucked down to 680 performance for 20-30w more power. the 680 is on par with the 1050ti and would get mashed by the 570/580 and 1060.

also x5650 for 20 bucks + dell precision t3500 for 40 dollars + 24gb ddr3 for 70 bucks + offhand modern card like a 7970 ghz edition would do well in 2018

>7970 ghz edition
Not I'm but I wanna get one for my 8350 rig, for the ultimate 2012 experience.

Attached: IMG_0215.jpg (4032x3024, 2.31M)

>Not I'm
him*

Damn, I own the same CPU and case but your guts look so much better than mine. I also got a fucking ton of case fans. My cable management is cancer.

>single slot gpu

i miss those

>TFW you got only 2 GB VRAM
This.
7870 barely matches minimum requirements for games today.
Not bad, this matches a 5820K @Stock.
Clockspeed? The 2700X is really a beast, getting around 5200 multicore.

Attached: 1899.jpg (3840x2160, 469K)

>gets btfo by my budget build
Nothing personnel kid

Attached: speccy.png (707x642, 48K)

Attached: 2jdu28hw9dh.png (120x90, 3K)

>pic related launched on Q3 2009
OP BTFO FOREVER AND EVER

Attached: file.png (401x401, 37K)

You just reminded me that the 90 Line existed.

my 7870 oc'd to 1400 on core 1600 on mem can plow through nearly any more modern titles on med-high at stable 60fps, fallout 4 on high never dropped bellow 45 and my friend with a ryzen 5 and 960 dropped to 30 in some points

>FX 9590

Your CPU is bottlenecking your GPU and you're overcompensating with RAM because that processor cannot run multiple programs in parallel.

I'll bet my left nut a modern SoC with 8 A73 cores would stop the shit out of any AMD Pile(of shit)driver processor, all with having a TDP lower than your IQ if that's even possible.

Attached: 1520052039405.jpg (653x726, 111K)

>7870
>1400 on core
You either have God's Golden Sample or some extreme cooling on that thing, in no way is 1400 a stable permanent clock for any Southern Islands GPU.

kek

>1080p
haha pleb, try running 3440x1440@100Hz, even the fucking 1080Ti sucks for that

it even beats the 5820K
I have one running in the basement as some sort of server, and it scored 2797 / 375