Make this more minimal

Make this more minimal

Attached: cunt.png (700x3000, 266K)

Other urls found in this thread:

files.yande.re/image/de4ccfba63a94b69a913d209b74cda67/yande.re 284105 game_cg koisuru_natsu_no_last_resort kouzaki_umi marui naked nipples pulltop_latte sheets.png
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>archlinux
>minimal

pick one

replace vim with vi or mg

>rc
>no 9term

tmux on tty with mpv for graphical media

Put Void on it.
Debian*
FTFY

Gentoo without portage

Why is slackware never on any of these lists

Any Linux distro is minimal compared to Windows
Who cares

Arch may be an okay distro but it isn't fucking minimal, when will this meme end

Also put LFS on it. That'll trigger every brainlet who thinks they're l337.

Remove all the software and distros.
Sit at an empty desk and imagine everything you want to do.

Can't get more minimal than that.

>arch
>debian
not minimal
>firefox
use qutebrowser
>image viewer
use mpv
>vim
bloat

Attached: 1494148820231.jpg (411x419, 25K)

fpbp

Void is so minimal, it doesn't even have a project leader!

Minimalism in concept is better than minimalism in resources.
E.g., Haskell and NixOS aren't minimal in terms computing speed, resource use, number of packages, etc.
But functional programming is minimal from an engineering perspective top down as opposed to bottom up.

Computers are bloat

Attached: guide.png (845x3892, 151K)

Please don't shitpost using Nadeko-sama. Thank you.

> Win7
Done

How did this get made without Slackware or NetBSD?

Attached: 2000px-Slackware_logo.svg.png (2000x2000, 775K)

Attached: minimalism_sucks.png (2068x1172, 1.36M)

+lynx
+dash
+sxiv
>>file manager
>standard unix tools
yeah, no.
acme is actually a valid choice as a file browser once you configure the plumber.
page(1) is not usable. it refuses to open some images for some reason and is just too slow for big images.

But qutebrowser is slow

My sides

Attached: kernelconfigurationandcompilation9728.jpg (728x546, 120K)

Remove:
* Arch
* Debian
* Firefox
* Vim
* Urxvt
Add:
* Void
* Vis/NeoVim

Why do you need a leader, when there's active core team?
Are you a fascist?

void linux, fish shell

Firefox isn't all that minimal

Is fish minimal?
It's super comfy, but that's it.

>>vim
>bloat

It's the least bloaty editor that actually has features. You could argue vi is a lot less bloaty but it doesn't have nearly the amount of editing features that vim does

I mean it's more minimal than oh-my-zsh, but that's not saying much. shells in general are pretty minimal

>It's the least bloaty editor that actually has features
Even neovim is way better
And something like Vis is absolutely minimal, while having regexp and lua support, making it more powerful.
Problem with the latter is no plugins yet.

>has features
you don't need them

there you go

Attached: 1526018246282.png (700x1776, 225K)

>firefox
>minimal

it's like 5MB, I think you're pushing it a bit. It's more minimal than the majority of editors

>It's more minimal than the majority of editors
Still filled with terrible, legacy and entirelyunneeded code.
>5Mb
Vis is 255kb and it has all the functionality of vanilla vim + more

Never said Vis wasn't minimal, I'm arguing that Vim at 5MB is

if you want something minimal why dont you just go for linux kernel + busy box

How can you argue that it's minimal when it (barely) supports platforms that you can't find anymore even if you tried?
Want vim implementation that is (a bit more) minimal, use neovim. They try to clean and restructure code. It's 4Mb, while vim + vim-common is around 6Mb.

>linux kernel + busy box
That's pretty much Alpine Linux.

I actually do use neovim, I came from vim and had to fix some things. When I tried moving back a week or so ago vim was buggy and wouldn't let me set my statusline. I'll probably try out Vis tomorrow when I get the chance

>vim with 29MB runtime
>minimal
Pick one faggot

>i3
Replace with herbstluftwm, all the features you need with nearly half the ram usage.

Firefox is so "minimal" it was memleaking and eating all my 16GB of RAM after being left open for a couple of weeks on current Debian stable. Just had to drop it after this shit happened three times in a row.

I'd argue for bspwm + sxhkd

>Make this more minimal
Ok.

Attached: Turing_Machine.jpg (1280x853, 114K)

works on my machine, it even opens like 50mb pdfs fine
delet this, most shells are bloated trash

This but unironically

weird
does this file work for you?
files.yande.re/image/de4ccfba63a94b69a913d209b74cda67/yande.re 284105 game_cg koisuru_natsu_no_last_resort kouzaki_umi marui naked nipples pulltop_latte sheets.png

Attached: 1526033279.png (1920x1200, 12K)

LFS + write your own text editor

Because he had control over some domains and the github account.
I don't know if it's been resolved yet.

Yeah, but why do you need him?
If something, core team will migrate.

They already have voidlinux.com and will probably make new gitlab account.

Yeah true. I was just answering the original question with what I know.

OP here, actually like it.

As much as I like slackware it was never designed to be a minimalist distro. Slackbuilds.org runs with the expectation you have a full installation.

Attached: 1522447406662.jpg (544x614, 82K)

didn't know mrproper was based on a brand name

get rid of debian, arch, i3 and firefox

replace it with?

Void, bspwm, vimb

All hipster trash

>All hipster trash
At lest bspwm is definitely not.
You can check directly on both GitHub and Reddit is you think otherwise.

Also, if you want to go mainstream, you have no right to complain about bloat.

tried using bspwm
shit doesn't work

>tried using bspwm
>shit doesn't work
It works out of the box when you copy the default config.
You might be retarded.

convert cunt.png -crop 700x2280 minimal.png
done

Based

Replace VIM, cmus, Nano and links with EMACS

The same reason it has Arch and Firefox listed
It was made by idiots

Add bspwm and this is flawless

I'll defend emacs until the day I die but it is absolutely not minimalist, it's very muchso the opposite

>minimal
Storage is cheap and even grandma has 16GB of RAM. What's the point

fpbp
too real

But what is the opposite of this
and what is the opposite of this but open source

>what is the opposite of this but open source
Anything made by Stallmann, GNU or GNOME

Gas yourself

Minimal software is more secure, easier to maintain, more portable, usully better code quality and less bugs. And perhaps *you* fell for the 128GB RAM meme, but not everyone is a brainlet like you. And if everyone wasted resources, then you would quickly run out of them.

Attached: 1504589906745.jpg (757x1024, 63K)

>Linux
>vim
>web browsers
>WMs
>minimal
Don't tell me you're using an x86 CPU too.

Unused RAM is wasted RAM, anime poster

anime board

Don't you mean "anime website"? And no, it stopped being an anime website when /b/ became the most popular board, which was basically instantly

>an*me

Attached: 1523275552886.png (500x1200, 162K)

How autistic do you need to be to value "muh minimalism" and executable size over everything, and to spend significant time hunting down the most "minimal" software?

Minimalism isn't even about the executable size, it's about source code size.

>Make each program do one thing well.
You know where you are right?

Why don't you just write your own minimal OS and software? Too busy shitposting and buying girl socks on aliexpress?

Ok senpai desu

Name one board you have been on that doesn't have an anime in a thread I'll wait

Hi Jow Forumsays let's develop a new os:
We don't use gnu core utils, kernel and any other thing what was ever written. Everything is bload botnet.

Who are you quoting?

Agreed except for vim

>We don't use gnu core utils
Alpine Linux.
Hopefully, Void Linux soon.

OpenBSD is a meme
>Filesystem
default FS doesn't even support SSD TRIM, and I don't think OpenBSD supports anything modern like ZFS or BTRFS.
>Security
"Only two remote holes in the default install!!!!!!!"
Yay!
I hope you realize that this literally only applies to a base system install with absolutely no packages added. In other words, not exactly representative or meaningful towards... anything really
>Sustainability
A few years ago, OpenBSD was actually in danger of shutting down because they couldn't keep the fucking lights on. How could anyone see this as a system they could rely on, when it could be in danger of ending at any time?
>Standards-compliance
"B-But OpenBSD is written in strictly standards-compliant C! Clearly that's better than muh GNU virus!"
So you're not allowed to create extensions to the standard? You should only implement the standard and nothing more? Keep in mind that this is nothing like EEE, as the GNU extensions are Free Software, with freely available source code, as opposed to proprietary shite. People should be allowed to innovate and improve things.
If you're gonna be anal about standards-compliance, then why let people make their own implementations anyway? Why not have the standards organizations make one C implementation and force everyone to use it?

Attached: thicc.jpg (442x293, 28K)

qutebrowser please

and you should probably remove ff

qutebrowser requires qt, which is the least minimal gui kit in existence, meaning it is not minimal

/gd/ has a big percentage of sane people.

>minimalism
>gnu/linux os

well soibois, you don't even know what real minimalism is, sage this thread already, thanks.

OS/Distro:
>Gentoo
>Alpine
>LFS
Minimal Programs:
WM:
>dwm
Browsers:
>Surf
File manager:
>cd, mv, cp, etc
Video/Music player
>A dedicated mp3 / flac player
>mpv
Image viewer:
>sxiv
Text Editors:
>ed, the standard text editor
>cat >> file
Shells:
>All of those are pretty much fine
Terminals
>tty

why isnt a base arch install minimal?

Explain to me how gentoo, nano, i3, firefox and mpv are minimal in any fucking way