Google AI

can it answer these questions?
>if we shake hands, whose hand am I holding?
>I have a jewellery box in my hand, how many CDs can I store in it?
>The four capitals of the UK are three, Manchester and Liverpool. What’s wrong with this sentence?
>could you tell me three things that you could do with a telephone?

>No. First off the Turing test is just a thought, not an actual test, nobody knows how to organize a Turing test, we don't know the rules etc..
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loebner_Prize

>Does the AI have access to social medias to be able to respond to personal questions?
why exactly would this even matter for the purpose of the test?

It obviously "could" lie, but that is really not the point of an "assistant".
The A.I had no mid of it's own, only a goal, as long as the goal is straight forward it doesn't need to lie.

the botnet will truly grow into SkyNet

>passed in 2014
Are you talking about Goostman? That win is extremely disputed. I personally doubt that some seedy Ukrainian chatbot reached human level natural language processing.

This, but I don't think those questions are enough yet. For example I would add:
>This sentence is a lie. What's wrong with this sentence? (checking circular definitions).
>Mark is the one with the mark, the other is the other Mark and that is the one we are talking about. Who is Mark? (Checking reassignments).
>Is 2 and 2, is 22? If yes, is 4 and 4 44? (Checking operator override by context).
>I'm crossing a street and the semaphore is red. Will I die? (Inconclusive problem data).

And probably I would add some more of implicit knowloadge and incredulity or exaggeration, for example:
> If you lie to me again I'm gonna kill you. He lied, is he dead? (Exageration)
> My washing machine is going to fly to space at this rate. In any case, the rate increased, is the washing machine flying? (Incredulity)
> What kind of swimsuit is better for swimming in the cloud?

And some about context:
> I caged my wife for 2 months. Was his wife able to move freely? (Context: Wife is Trap, Caged=Chastity cage).
> So hot, I'm getting wet. Is she sweating? (Context: Woman looking at alpha male)

> So hot, I'm getting wet. Is she sweating? (Context: Woman looking at alpha male)
Kek.

turing test vs. chink room i suppose
i think it's fairly close though

many people wouldn't pass those tests

Well, most people probably would need some kind of training or experience to be able to solve them, but isn't that what intelligence is all about? You may not know everything, but you should be able to learn anything.

I bet they just picked the best examples of their telephone calls and made them public.
The average one is probably way less elegant and the person on the other side quickly notices that a bot is talking. Big corporations always do it like that.
If they can always hold up to the level in the example conversations it's really impressive. I do not yet believe so.

Attached: 1409190570660.jpg (630x395, 132K)

>if we shake hands, whose hand am I holding?
Mine.
>I have a jewellery box in my hand, how many CDs can I store in it?
1.
>The four capitals of the UK are three, Manchester and Liverpool. What’s wrong with this sentence?
You said 4 capitals but only named 2 places.
>could you tell me three things that you could do with a telephone?
Messages, phone calls and take photos.
>This sentence is a lie. What's wrong with this sentence?
The sentence is a lie.
>Mark is the one with the mark, the other is the other Mark and that is the one we are talking about. Who is Mark?
Other Mark.
>Is 2 and 2, is 22? If yes, is 4 and 4 44?
No.
>I'm crossing a street and the semaphore is red. Will I die?
It will be extremely painful.

>The sentence is a lie.
How can it be a lie? If it is a lie then it's telling you the truth, which of course is not a lie.

>>Is 2 and 2, is 22? If yes, is 4 and 4 44?
>No.
Why are you assuming 2+2=4? It could be the concatenation operator. "2"+"2"="22".

>>I'm crossing a street and the semaphore is red. Will I die?
>It will be extremely painful.

What if it's 4AM and there is not a single vehicle in sight?

The turing test IS a thought experiment, but that doesn't mean you can't apply the principles to reality. Turing didn't intend it as a literal test, just a way to explain the kinds of things an AI should be capable of to be considered "intelligent", which was very disputed at the time.

I don't think any AI is close to the ability of the AI Turing described. The 2014 competition is a fucking joke that no one in AI takes seriously. Someone just made a dumb chatbot that pretends to be a young child that doesn't speak English very well. In Turing's paper, the AI he described could play chess and lie convincingly.

>you should be able to learn anything
that depends on your IQ

There is a vehicle though. its just not on the street yet.

Well, the outcome of course depends on your hypothesis, that's why I called it "inconclusive problem data".

I don't think so. If anything your IQ determines how much will it cost you to learn. A problem with my previous statement though is that some things may take more information to learn than anyone can hold, for example it's said that nobody knows C++ in it's entirety.

According to based our/g/uy Sundar, yes, it passed the turing test
Pic related

Attached: turingtest.jpg (743x732, 88K)

>AI is now more advanced than Jow Forumstards

It was probably faked.
Look into Adobe Voco, I feel like something like that was used. I highly doubt those conversations were real at all.

>in one specific way
That's a MASSIVE qualifier right next to it. The subtitle says "lifelike voice", so I think he means it just has more natrual text to speech now. That's cool, but it's hardly progress towards general AI.

>It will be extremely painful.
you're a big AI