HOLY SHIT FIREFOX 60 SUPPORTS TABS IN TITLEBAR

YEAR OF LINUX DESKTOP

Attached: finally.webm (1024x768, 588K)

Other urls found in this thread:

trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Capture/Desktop
github.com/kurogetsusai/firefox-gnome-theme/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Finally... I can delete this one from the 'annoying things that prevent from switching to linux' list.

what's remaining?

[email protected]

leaked fug

You could always just disable titlebars. They are a waste of precious screen space.

This guy was posting his twitter """debates""" with sjws yesterday, who is this.

why did it take 4 years to implement this in linux even though it always worked in winshits?

don't dox me please

Attached: eric-schmidt.png (310x461, 179K)

why would I want that?
if you really dont like all the bars and menus and stuff just hit f11 and go full screen mode

98% websites dont actually use all that extra space (efficiently) anyway

>no sandboxing with ALSA
>any feature
Yeah, no.

Which is why I loved Unity, as controversial as that may be. I love how it saved vertical space and just got out of my way. How can I achieve that in another DE? Barring Unity I've always liked KDE and Xfce.

>posting your email on Jow Forums
>don't dox

Uh, I don't have 60 and I have this

Is that actual linux performance or is the weebum just made like that?

It's not my personal email, it's my new internet persona I'm creating.

>use xfce
>disable title bar when fullscreen
>use alt+left click to move and resize windows
>shortcuts to move program on the borders, edges and middle of the screen
Title bar have always been useless in linux for years

any news for KDE?

Always up-to-date video drivers

which version do you have?

webm,

anyone know how to get good quality ffmpeg recordings or other ways to make smooth webms?
I'm using:

ffmpeg -f x11grab -s 1024x768 -i :0.0 -r 25 -vcodec libvpx {name of webm}

or is it my crappy pc?

Attached: bill-gates.png (341x455, 244K)

AFAIK you can disable titlebars and other junk on every good DE. They all have keybindings to close and change windows without using the mouse. And once you start doing that you can't go back.

dat fps
also old news, people did it like 5 or so years ago, not sure why would you want that anyway

>Having a title-bar
>Staring at tabs

Attached: 2018-05-11-16:37:36-screenshot.png (1269x1426, 297K)

Record the video in h264. Then convert to webm after it's recorded. H264 is faster to encode and has better support on older hardware. Webm encoding can be slow, especially since you aren't using the multithread options or the fast encoding options.

Try recording lossless and encoding afterward

Something like
ffmpeg -video_size 1024x768 -framerate 30 -f x11grab -i :0.0 -c:v libx264 -crf 0 -preset ultrafast output.mkv

taken from
trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Capture/Desktop

>horizontal tabs

Attached: vuiouioui.png (1920x1041, 295K)

>debates
They were so bad I think uninterested might actually side with SJWs against Stallman.

I'll look into that, then. Thanks!

thanks, way smoother

>horizontal tabs

Attached: 1506891898022.jpg (249x237, 32K)

T h i s

this is legit one of the reasons I never use linux

Attached: aaaaaaaaa.png (720x4811, 42K)

Here's a simple way to fix Jow Forums: posting on Jow Forums bans you from all other boards for a week.

dumb frogposter, it looks great

Attached: 2018-05-11-165932_1285x277_scrot.png (1285x277, 97K)

where else am I gonna discuss politics?

Nowhere else, only on Jow Forums. That's the fucking point.

that's what I do

get a life honestly

eat shit retard, how's your basement?

>eat shit retard
Jow Forumstards get triggered easier than SJWs

>how's your basement
It's alright. Recently redecorated to make it habitable and added a pool table because why not. I don't really use it much though.

The anti Jow Forums fags are far more annoying than any poltards.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux" distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

Attached: 1511577092964.jpg (400x300, 11K)

When's Thunderbird?

>that performance
Good thing I use chromium here.

windows has it from since the beginning of time.

Attached: Képernyőfelvétel (34).png (1366x768, 131K)

...

I always disabled my titlebars on openbox and i3wm anyway

I forgot title bars existed.

Attached: aBx6L6P_460s.jpg (460x678, 98K)

They horizontal space efficiently, hence the white gaps on the left/right.
Vertical space is ALWAYS used from top to bottom.

It's shit on Kubuntu
I can't resize the window when I hide the titlebar, and it doesn't adjust the color of the tab names to the browser theme (black text on dark bar)

fug

Attached: Screenshot_20180511_124856.png (452x70, 9K)

How the fuck did this take 60 years

sent ;)

jézus krisztus. Get a real screen.

its bugged when you resize the window in MATE, it leaves some transparent space. Still nice to have tho

Attached: bug.png (451x540, 125K)

Why don't you activate your Windows, user?
You want Microsoft to go bankrupt?

Buy a license right now, goyim!

nvm just werks, I didn't check "drag space"

Attached: nobug.png (585x650, 122K)

I'm adding you to every porn and scam list I can find.

>adds him to maybe three
>gets tired
>takes a nap and forgets

if you want to use muh tiling i3 then then `new_widow none` in the config will disable titlebars and borders

Why is your screen recorder so laggy?

I fixed it, it was because I was encoding to webm realtime

I hide the stupid tab bar in userChrome.css, I use the address bar to navigate tabs.

i3wm never had this problem

does this work on xfce?

The webm of the OP is on XFCE

Debian Stable with backports, my dude. I get new kernels, Mesa, Nvidia drivers, programming languages, etc.

Just use AMD/Intel

> just hit f11

Having your browser take up your entire screen is unnecessary, plus I'm nearly always doing multiple things at once.

>Having your browser take up your entire screen is unnecessary
Look here . This does not take entire screen.

it works very well in gnome

It did this years ago with Unity, didn't it?

KDE has an option to hide titlebars

the entire UI of Firefox is completely alterable via userChrome.css
I hate dual-booting winshits

>implying dual-boot

Attached: Linus_Torvalds_(cropped).jpg (234x298, 15K)

wow this was totally relevant to the thread
gook moot should ban this dude instead

Dumb frog poster.

Attached: 1438105700319.png (852x2375, 694K)

Active Window Control on KDE. Enable window buttons and check 'hide titlebars' option.

Idk but I hate this shit

No, Richard, it's 'Linux', not 'GNU/Linux'. The most important contributions that the FSF made to Linux were the creation of the GPL and the GCC compiler. Those are fine and inspired products. GCC is a monumental achievement and has earned you, RMS, and the Free Software Foundation countless kudos and much appreciation. Following are some reasons for you to mull over, including some already answered in your FAQ. One guy, Linus Torvalds, used GCC to make his operating system (yes, Linux is an OS -- more on this later). He named it 'Linux' with a little help from his friends. Why doesn't he call it GNU/Linux? Because he wrote it, with more help from his friends, not you. You named your stuff, I named my stuff -- including the software I wrote using GCC -- and Linus named his stuff. The proper name is Linux because Linus Torvalds says so. Linus has spoken. Accept his authority. To do otherwise is to become a nag. You don't want to be known as a nag, do you? (An operating system) != (a distribution). Linux is an operating system. By my definition, an operating system is that software which provides and limits access to hardware resources on a computer. That definition applies whereever you see Linux in use. However, Linux is usually distributed with a collection of utilities and applications to make it easily configurable as a desktop system, a server, a development box, or a graphics workstation, or whatever the user needs. In such a configuration, we have a Linux (based) distribution. Therein lies your strongest argument for the unwieldy title 'GNU/Linux' (when said bundled software is largely from the FSF). Go bug the distribution makers on that one. Take your beef to Red Hat, Mandrake, and Slackware. At least there you have an argument. Linux alone is an operating system that can be used in various applications without any GNU software whatsoever. Embedded applications come to mind as an obvious example.

Attached: 1519722725065.jpg (2346x2346, 2.51M)

Next, even if we limit the GNU/Linux title to the GNU-based Linux distributions, we run into another obvious problem. XFree86 may well be more important to a particular Linux installation than the sum of all the GNU contributions. More properly, shouldn't the distribution be called XFree86/Linux? Or, at a minimum, XFree86/GNU/Linux? Of course, it would be rather arbitrary to draw the line there when many other fine contributions go unlisted. Yes, I know you've heard this one before. Get used to it. You'll keep hearing it until you can cleanly counter it. You seem to like the lines-of-code metric. There are many lines of GNU code in a typical Linux distribution. You seem to suggest that (more LOC) == (more important). However, I submit to you that raw LOC numbers do not directly correlate with importance. I would suggest that clock cycles spent on code is a better metric. For example, if my system spends 90% of its time executing XFree86 code, XFree86 is probably the single most important collection of code on my system. Even if I loaded ten times as many lines of useless bloatware on my system and I never excuted that bloatware, it certainly isn't more important code than XFree86. Obviously, this metric isn't perfect either, but LOC really, really sucks. Please refrain from using it ever again in supporting any argument. Last, I'd like to point out that we Linux and GNU users shouldn't be fighting among ourselves over naming other people's software. But what the heck, I'm in a bad mood now. I think I'm feeling sufficiently obnoxious to make the point that GCC is so very famous and, yes, so very useful only because Linux was developed. In a show of proper respect and gratitude, shouldn't you and everyone refer to GCC as 'the Linux compiler'? Or at least, 'Linux GCC'? Seriously, where would your masterpiece be without Linux? Languishing with the HURD? If there is a moral buried in this rant, maybe it is this:

yes, welcome to 2009.

Be grateful for your abilities and your incredible success and your considerable fame. Continue to use that success and fame for good, not evil. Also, be especially grateful for Linux' huge contribution to that success. You, RMS, the Free Software Foundation, and GNU software have reached their current high profiles largely on the back of Linux. You have changed the world. Now, go forth and don't be a nag. Thanks for listening.

mozilla spies on you and install addons without your consent

I disabled it :^)

>HOLY SHIT FIREFOX 60 SUPPORTS TABS IN TITLEBAR
i don't have title bars, where will the tabs go?

try it out and post screenshots

>Horizontal tabs

Attached: 1511200840000.png (1415x910, 263K)

Great. Can we finally get more compact tabs and grouped tabs?

Because Mozilla targets windows first.

Check this out.
github.com/kurogetsusai/firefox-gnome-theme/
You can thank me later.

Attached: firefox-gnome-theme.png (1474x394, 119K)

quantum a shite
CTR when

Attached: ctr.png (960x1055, 16K)

that font rendering is ratchet

Attached: 1516849886956.jpg (251x251, 5K)

yuge waste of screen real estate

That's a lot of wasted space. A 200x800 chunk of your screen completely gone.

I can hide it with a keypress. I also usually have more tabs open than this.

Xfce hides the titlebar in fullscreen, so this has never mattered.

Attached: Screenshot_2018-05-11_16-20-55.png (254x85, 8K)

>that font rendering

Attached: Capturesmall.jpg (674x599, 67K)