He calls the GNU operating system "Linux"

>he calls the GNU operating system "Linux"

Attached: 1514975402139.jpg (705x490, 135K)

Sage this bait

daily reminder that without linux, GNU would be still playing with their own shit (Hurd)

>see that androgynous fat kid?
>yeah
>he uses linux
>I thought so teeheehee

Attached: d_32092_girls-women-laughing-secret.jpg (1200x943, 124K)

>tfw silly girls mistake /v/ermin to Jow Forumsentooman

Attached: VIM.jpg (1024x683, 203K)

>using Linux with GNU in 2018

Attached: 1526060116828.jpg (705x490, 226K)

Honestly if some blonde slut knew what linux was i'd be extremely surprised

>using Linux without GNU in any year since 1993

Attached: 1457290113088-0.gif (478x360, 1.36M)

Do I read this right to left or left to right?

But we have better alternatives to gcc and glibc now.
Why would you willingly use worse alternatives?

>GNU operating system
WTF? How is GNU an OS? How is it anything but couple of bloated programs?

It's Linux operating system with some additional software, such as MUSL libc, BusyBox, clang, etc.

MUSL libc, BusyBox, clang, etc. aren't part of Linux. Linux is a kernel.

True.
However, Linux Kernel es the basis of any and every Linux distribution, while everything else is pretty interchangeable.

Therefore OS is "Linux distribution". Not GNU distribution, not LLVM distribution, but Linux distribution.

If Stallman/GNU/FSF want to appropriate an OS, let them do so with HURD.

holy shit look at that guy in red in the middle
I want to suck his dick while he teaches me vim keybindings

>But we have better alternatives to gcc and glibc now.
Name a few.

Actually no good alternatives exist.

Attached: 1508169358538.jpg (800x415, 276K)

>he
you mean most of the fuckin' planet you live on, except you and your circlejerking buddies.

Why does the one on the right look like she was devil's spawn or at the very least possesed?

r9k way
>call a blonde slut
>pay her for an hour
>teach her installing a simple distro on a shitty netbook
>mandatory sex scene
>give her the rig

compile linux with clang

>tfw she won't win

Google Pixel toolchain don't have gcc.

kernel is provided as a binary so (((they))) don't need it

>GNU
>operating system
pick any one

>compile linux with clang
You mean like that?

Attached: 2018-05-11-22:12:59-screenshot.png (1262x72, 17K)

Attached: 1525526493922.png (720x374, 71K)

Like how? I can't see what you mean.

Op your comic is backwards. Stallman does not approve.

You can read, can't you?
This kernel was compiled with clang 6.0.0

It's not explicitly stated in the text.
If it is could you explain it to me.
I only see the kernel and clang versions.

Attached: 1525958775800.jpg (702x800, 66K)

>GNU is an OS
>According to authors of GNU

Yes, the clang version is reported by the kernel.
If you compile it with GCC this would say GCC version 7.3.0 or something.

Attached: giphy.gif (300x289, 1.44M)

but it's just a grep
it could easily be faked

Though I still need GCC to run make oldconfig/nconfig for some reason.
All the compilation is done with clang, however.

How do you fake dmesg?

Attached: 2018-05-11-22:29:41-screenshot.png (1270x709, 95K)

#include

using namespace std;

int main()
{
cout

>He insists on calling the systemd operating system with the linux kernel GNU/Linux

lel

What if you can see how I call dmesg?

Attached: 2018-05-11-22:44:25-screenshot.png (1270x710, 43K)

me in the middle

//we can do this for ages

#include

using namespace std;

int main()
{
cout

top lel

btw you can just scroll the terminal

how about ffmpeg screencap?
Then you can see me spawn terminal and enter the comand.

Or I can run it in `fish` it has color output and completion suggestions.

>btw you can just scroll the terminal
You can't in `st` (without patches)

SAGE

Or I can send you the kernel binary and you check for yourself.

>using a terminal emulator that doesn't even have scrolling

With the power of video editing you can easily make it look like you didn't fake it.
And you might have tamperd with the kernel binary to make it look like it was clang compiled.

>And you might have tamperd with the kernel binary to make it look like it was clang compiled.
How about I send you my config and a binary?
Then you compile it yourself and compare the checksums.

>Video editing
>Shitty ffmpeg capture
Yeah... Why would I do that again?