GAHNOO niggas acting like only linux has a terminal. hell...

GAHNOO niggas acting like only linux has a terminal. hell,the windows terminal is even a million times better documented.

microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=56846

Attached: Képernyőfelvétel (44).png (1366x768, 471K)

Other urls found in this thread:

microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=56846
itprotoday.com/management-mobility/q-what-here-string-windows-powershell
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>windows "terminal"
>well documented
my sides, if you wanted to bait you could've at least tried with powershell

documenting garbage doesn't make it not garbage

>uMatrix has prevented the following page from loading:
>microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=56846

Attached: 1521163083675.jpg (619x630, 51K)

have you taken a look at the pdf in the link i provided?if the linux terminal is more well documented i would like to see it because i had to write a bunch of bash scripts and theres no documentation aside from the man pages.

/thread

>there's no documentation aside from the documentation

Attached: 1501855486618.jpg (1838x2048, 129K)

>theres no documentation aside from the man pages
I do not understand the problem.

>why would anyone want a pdf with a contents list and clickable links for searching through the commands alphabetically.

yeah,i wonder who would want that abomination.

the typical GAHNOO fags XD.

>if something is done wrong but linux does it that way then thats the good way of doing it

XDDDDDDDDDDDD LMAOOOOOO

You can find man pages online though

those are shit too.just fucking txt's.
i want one man page with all the commands,links,alphabetical ordering and other things any sane documentation in 2018 should provide.

Attached: Képernyőfelvétel (45).png (1366x768, 184K)

What the fuck do you need that for? You can use the terminal it's far more effective

i would use the terminal if there would be a documentation where i can learn it from.

>oh you want a manual,just write man {command}
>oh, you dont know the name of the command you want the man page for?
>well,then its your fault because thats not how linux does things therefore this is the right way of doing it.

hallo cuman

>what is apropos?
>what is man -K?

>microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=56846
OOOOOOH! We have a website for that! Dumb faggot, Linux has the documentation built in.

I'd just ctrl+f but alright

get chekt

user you are an idiot if this isn't b8.
why do you need a clickable link when you can just type man command and have your docs in .1 seconds.
It gives you everything you need to know, and if it doesn't, you're functionally retarded.

Most people do not know or care much about the Windows terminal because, unless you are dealing with directly running files from it, the GUI-based approach is just objectively better and easier to learn for your average user (so basically unless you are autistic.)

Theres plenty of solid pdfs on shell scripting floating around. You just haven't tried looking or looked hard enough, because you are biased towards powershell.

Attached: cmd - Copy.png (1008x2460, 665K)

I do love powershell though...
Some tasks are just tidious executing through GUI.

Also scripting of certain complex tasks is tottaly worth learning powershell.

>For example:
I make a lot of videos with an iphone and push them into my nextcloud.
Sadly, iOS features only h265 in .mov
So I occasionally run a script that converts these files into h264 .mp4 an place the .mov files in a folder called "source_vid" while the .mp4 files are placed in "Videos".

It's a simple script that would take extremely long using GUIs such as "Handbrake" or something.

>non-free
"Hur dur anything you pay for is bad!" - typical Jow Forumsarage room NEET
>Not enough CLI tools
This is a legit issue that needs to be worked on
>No heredocs
There are....
>Disgusting arrays
Subjective
>Findstr only fives you one quantifier
So....?
>Escape caret
This is pure autism that you do not like a carat...
>Command history sucks
Why the fuck do you need a search history of commands? That is just bloat.
>Echo
Lots of commands are unintuitive. Who would ever fucking come up with sudo means "super user do" as opposed to just "super" or anything else? Also, subjective.
>echo "derp"
It is a literal. There is literally nothing wrong with literals. Also, subjective.
>Globbing is inconsistent.
Legitimate issue

2/10. This meme fails.

Show me a heredoc in cmd.
Or even just throw me a link.

>complaining about bloat
>wangblows

>trying to program in cmd

Attached: vr.jpg (1620x599, 216K)

>>echo "derp"
>It is a literal. There is literally nothing wrong with literals. Also, subjective.
Write your own version of echo. Then type
echo "derp"

Compare CMD's argument parsing/passing in this case to the result when using the built-in echo.

itprotoday.com/management-mobility/q-what-here-string-windows-powershell
Not an argument. Any less bloat is good. Just because there is bloat does not mean you you instantly do not care about adding more.

Windows's tree is much better at representing the folders than Linux's ls

>>Findstr only fives you one quantifier
>So....?
Given a two- or four-digit year, matched by the following regex:
\d\d(\d\d)?

How would you use findstr to match it?

>here strings work in powershell
You trying to move the goalposts, son? My point still stands. CMD doesn't have here strings, or here docs, or whatever you want to call them.

Nice goalpost move

Samefagging.

Nope

Attached: Screenshot_20180513-132248.png (1080x1920, 142K)

i like it to be honest

Attached: Képernyőfelvétel (49).png (1366x768, 154K)