Why don't they hurry up and release a 128bit CPU and destroy Ryzen?

less bits are better because it means there are fewer components broken inside the cpu meaning its more stable

It also means shorter addresses and thus less memory and faster lookup

I hate this stupid site and you all, you fucking retards.

why

Intel got greedy and assumed they could keep churning out dogshit that had gaping security holes, now they're about to fall behind big time.

Attached: 1515326867588.jpg (1117x1600, 891K)

nigga what?fuck off from Jow Forums you gaymer retard.what is even the thinking behind 128 bit being good?or you just saying it because you think higher number means better?why double the size of pointers and by that increase the ram usage of programs for no goddamn reason.wtf.

Attached: 1526053038725.jpg (500x375, 23K)

b8'd.

shes phattt

too bad jim keller is the only person alive who would be capable of 128bit cpu. since nobody except him could do:
more than 1 core
64 bit
memory controllers
mobile chips that mattered

why? who is gonna follow to create ANY program or give ANY support for 128 bit?

they barely can bottleneck 64bit as it is lol

>128 bit
Wtf
Whats the point

I don't see how you can say this unless you literally just browse the internet on your computer. 2500k was a good cpu but i upgraded to ryzen last year when i could no longer take the constant 100% usage stuttering in games. Got a nice fps boost too.

It's called shitposting

> 128 bit
risc v

I'm playing games tho. Like, i have 30-40 FPS in Kingdom Come. In stock frequency. With fucking 1050Ti.
When i'll overclock it and buy 1070, this is gonna be a great system.

because they have already destroyed Ryzen with Coffee Lake.

I got a stable 60fps with a GT 1030
get on my level

>that 30 year old boomer who thinks delidlake was anything but a rushed out failure

Attached: 1526305720408.jpg (233x216, 7K)