Senate vote on net neutrality happening imminently

Why is there so much anti-consumer shilling, be it against GDPR or NN?

THE TENSION

Attached: file.png (245x71, 27K)

Oh fuck they might actually bring it back

it's never been about the tech or the internet itself.
It's just politics, pure politics, void of any ideology, just a bunch of jews selling their shit, and you fallin right for it.
Not a single dude in that room has thought more than 2seconds about what impact it could have on the internet, on its users, on technology, or even evolution of the eco system.

fuck off to ur underaged containment board

>ISP offers gigabit after announcement of NN repeal
>I might now lose it because they anticipated it to pass
Thanks for sucking corporate dick guys

Attached: 1525107756920.gif (500x375, 551K)

reuters.com/article/us-usa-internet/us-net-neutrality-bill-gets-enough-senate-votes-to-advance-idUSKCN1IH2DS

winrar?

Hmm. I wonder how far this will actually go.

OH NO NO NO NO NO
DRUMPF SUPPORTERS BTFO

Attached: DdV9xDYW0AEQA6l.jpg (940x788, 187K)

It still has to go through the house and then to trump. Jow Forums of course will auto veto it because libruls support it and mr oyveyburg said it was a good idea to veto it

>>ISP offers gigabit after announcement of NN repeal
I kinda would like to see which parts of net neutrality were a barrier for them to offer such speeds. Did they mention anything non-net neutral in their offering?

Senators that just voted against net neutrality:
Alexander, Lamar (R-TN)
Barasso, John (R-WY)
Blunt, Roy (R-MO)
Boozman, John (R-AR)
Burr, Richard (R-NC)
Capito, Shelley Moore (R-WV)
Cassidy, Bill (R-LA)
Corker, Bob (R-TN)
Cornyn, John (R-TX)
Cotton, Tom (R-AR)
Crapo, Mike (R-ID)
Cruz, Ted (R-TX)
Daines, Steve (R-MT)
Enzi, Michael B. (R-WY)
Ernst, Joni (R-IA)
Fischer, Deb (R-NE)
Flake, Jeff (R-AZ)
Gardner, Cory (R-CO)
Graham, Lindsey (R-SC)
Grassley, Chuck (R-IA)
Hatch, Orrin G. (R-UT)
Heller, Dean (R-NV)
Hoeven, John (R-ND)
Hyde-Smith, Cindy (R-MS)
Inhofe, James M. (R-OK)
Isakson, Johnny (R-GA)
Johnson, Ron (R-WI)
Lankford, James (R-OK)
Lee, Mike (R-UT)
McConnell, Mitch (R-KY)
Moran, Jerry (R-KS)
Paul, Rand (R-KY)
Perdue, David (R-GA)
Portman, Rob (R-OH)
Risch, James E. (R-ID)
Roberts, Pat (R-KS)
Rounds, Mike (R-SD)
Rubio, Marco (R-FL)
Sasse, Ben (R-NE)
Scott, Tim (R-SC)
Shelby, Richard C. (R-AL)
Sullivan, Dan (R-AK)
Thune, John (R-SD)
Tillis, Thom (R-NC)
Toomey, Patrick J. (R-PA)
Wicker, Roger F. (R-MS)
Young, Todd (R-IN)

gigabit speeds should have been available throughout the nation several years ago and public funds paid for that supposed upgrade...NN has nothing to do with it.

What does this NN booklet of laws say about freedom for the internet user?
Do any of you actually know what the laws say? Or are you just parroting common opinion?

It looks like democrats are making themselves useful, or they didn't get as much money.

Quite nice reading actually.
federalregister.gov/documents/2011/09/23/2011-24259/preserving-the-open-internet

I believe 3 Rs also voted yes.

thats fucking great

Amazing. 3 out of the 51 republican senators actually had common sense.

Attached: Smug Anime Face.jpg (320x320, 9K)

What is all this "L" stuff I'm seeing everywhere?

What "L"?

Loss obviously

How can one person be this retarded?

Attached: 92d.jpg (211x239, 5K)

This means nothing. Trump will veto it if it ever shows up on his desk because he hates pointless wasteful regulations.

>only people who agree with me have common sense
She lost

not
an
argument

Based Ted

Attached: 1467605334939.jpg (600x400, 63K)

How mentally retarded do you need to be to get brainscrubbed by russian trolls this hard?

Only the Russian bots here are against this

My how Jow Forums has fallen

More like he hates things he can't personally profit from.

This. It wasn't even a thing before 2015, but the infographics with 6 million dollar Facebook fees are too powerful.

Do tell how he will profit from the NN repeal

This. Anyone have the screenshot of the FCC hearing where they said pretty much ISPs can do whatever they like but theyll just be not considered a broadband provider.

Congratulations, the bandaid was placed back.
Now actually fix the shit.
Decouple the companies that lay the cable from the companies that serve internet or pay the consequences.

NN is not back in place lmao the senate cant just do that on their own. The house has a very large republican majority and will not pass it

Come on, now.
cnet.com/news/senate-dems-demand-answers-from-at-t-ceo-about-payments-to-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen/
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-10/-no-cohen-inquiries-to-fcc-on-net-neutrality-on-at-t-s-behalf

Then you're a bit more fucked.

>cnet
>The malware website
>news
Kek
I skimmed the other article and saw nothing about trump getting money from it.

I'm not. I hate netflix and google. Id be just fine with a paywall blocking them

Literally has nothing to do with nn you fucking stupid nigger.

Go back

Attached: ff.png (826x506, 174K)

>ad-hominem

>AT&T confirmed Tuesday evening that it paid President Trump's personal lawyer Michael Cohen in 2017 for "insights into understanding the new administration."
The payments were revealed in a document published by Stormy Daniels' attorney Michael Avenatti Tuesday afternoon.

>Avenatti alleged that Essential Consultants, a shell company set up by Cohen before the election to pay Daniels, was paid by several corporations, including AT&T. At the time, AT&T was seeking government approval for its acquisition of Time Warner, CNN's parent company.

>A document released by Avenatti stated that "Essential received $200,000 in four separate payments of $50,000 in late 2017 and early 2018 from AT&T."

Tell your handlers to send someone else, you're done.

What will actually happen is the "normienets".
Internet services that give priority to what normies access and fuck with all the rest.

>adhominem
Lmfao cnet actually distributes viruses you fucktard
>stormy daniels lawyer
Hahahaha k bye retard

Did your crystal ball tell you that because what actually happened is isps were throttling streaming (normie) websites and one blocked normiechan and normiebay but it was reversed

You fucking, idiot. It has to go through the House to get to the Senate in the first place

>trumpanzee can't read
>AT&T confirmed Tuesday evening that it paid President Trump's personal lawyer Michael Cohen in 2017 for "insights into understanding the new administration."
I seemto have to repost the same article several times because your shit for brains can't digest more than one paragraph at a time. Sad!

Nah, there are Fox news watching retards all over Jow Forums now. Politics are gay af now. People take this shit too seriously.

No it doesnt you retard

Trump isnt cohen. Cohen is a private citizen

He's his personal lawyer, or was until they put the cuffs on the fucker. Your denial is hilarious.

Trump is going to veto it. His first veto ever. I don't think he ever veto a bill, so this will be a first? I dunno. I hate poltics.

Dude cohen is being investigated lol not trump. Cohen will likely be charged too but cohen isnt trump and cohrn doesnt work for the government

It wont pass the house he wont get it

didn't it have to start in the house?

Nope. Not sure where you guys get the idea a bill has to start in the house. The house and senate often draft 2 versions of the same bill at the same time. The only requirement is the same bill passes both the house and senate

kek. Republitards must be dumbest of all corrupt politicians

They wouldnt be republicans if they support more big government regulations, they would be rinos.

Which is hilarious to me. 10 years ago everyone laughed at Fox news here. What the fuck happened?

...

Sjw far left communists didnt do the democrat party any favors. Democrat party until bill clinton was fine but now they are shit

Unironic KKK style racists, Jow Forums, and 2016 happened. Jow Forums is filled with old people that came over from the_donald that believe every bit of garbage propaganda that Trump's Fox news and friends puts out. I miss the days where we just hated niggers and had a good time shitposting. Now everyone is super bitter about gay ass politics.

Best post.

>Democrat party until bill clinton was fine but now they are shit
I agree with you for the most part, but given the last few retards we've had for presidents, I'd welcome the 90's Bill Clinton as a messiah.

If he wasnt fucking interns he would have been one of the greatest of all time

>The internet survived for decades without,
Yeah, retard, and the internet was still a fairly exclusive nerd hangout until cell phones became popular. It's money making potential hadn't been realized until then.There weren't half the services available either. How naive do you have to be to not see that this is just a money grabbing attempt by cable companies who know that television is on it's last legs? They have nothing new invested in this. They're just robbing the tech industry and their consumers.

>How naive do you have to be to not see that this is just a money grabbing attempt by cable companies who know that television is on it's last legs
>the government, google, and netflix enact 2015 bill to force isps to hand over bandwidth priority
>it was the isps who made grab attempts

This is your brain on non c++ languages.

Attached: 1525785453906.png (325x481, 318K)

Lindsey Graham
Mitch McConnell
Cruz
Rubio
C'mon,user,did you really need to ask?

this vote is just an excuse for more net neutrality slide on every website on earth. the bill is dead on arrival in the house, literally impossible to pass, thus meaningless. i'm so tired of hearing homos argue about NN, why won't they let me live in peace?

>hand over
No.It was enacted to prevent prioritization.

Except it gave prioritization to google and netflix rather than prevented anything.

why is muttland seen as the "bastion of democracy" when something that has been voted for by a large majority can just get rejected/vetoed by one single person?
the opinion of one special person is more important than everyone else's? that doesn't sound fair.

>unreasonably discriminate
What particularly is unreasonable, user?
ISPs have employed "packet shaping" and QoS measures for well before NN was a social "problem".

I for one have come to the conclusion that the entire debacle is an irrational fear pushed onto the public perception.
The last major "ISP" I can think of which had a tiered or gated method of content was AOL, and they got outcompeted a long, long time ago. The free market legitimately solved the 'problem' of Net Neutrality.

Well, eurofag or huehue faggot, this is only the dems continuing to cry about something only their corporate warlords who pay them care about. So they keep pushing for russia and shit cause that's their entire existence.

>Everything I do not agree with is a Russian.
>Russians defend the second amendment
>Russians hacked Hillary and found her emails against Sanders

It's interesting how Russians care more about America than the Democrats do. Maybe you guys are the Jews of the world that nobody likes.

that has nothing to do with what i asked. i didn't mention any specific party. stop deflecting and forcing your irrelevant political views.

I answered your question in the context of net neutrality. You're on Jow Forums, I shouldnt have to tell you this shit.

No it didn't, traffic was simply left alone. Christ, where do you people get this shit?

i didn't mention net neutrality either; it was a general question.

I hope it gets repealed so we don't have to deal with america shitty political threads.

>No it didn't
That was the entire purpose of net neutrality in 2015. Dont believe me, go read the news in 2014 starting with netflix complaints about bandwidth, then follow the trail into 2015 as they are conveniently involved in entacting control over isps.

Money trails explain everything.

>The free market legitimately solved the 'problem' of Net Neutrality.
Yes but that wouldn't happen in a market that was made extremely profitable by doing what AOL did. You can't compare any of this to prior markets.The Jews back then were naive and had no vision of the future. It's like Ballmer saying the iPhone would fail.

then gtfo of this thread

The FCC has been the agency of legal enforcement pushing the principles of net neutrality for the entirety of its history. Even with broadband infrastructure, the FCC in 2004 with a republican chairman proposed four major principles. Those were legally enforced by the Bush administration starting in 2005 and were eventually codified, actively providing Americans with legally binding net neutrality well before Title II of the Telecommunications Act was brought in. Those regulations were continued through the Obama administration. In 2012, ISPs started failing to maintain their ports, leading to Netflix customers unnecessarily suffering frequent buffering, while ISPs expected to be paid by content providing companies like Netflix to alleviate the issue. In 2015, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the argument that those services were failing to provide the service that Title II required then to, legally solidifying what had been enforced by the FCC for a decade.

>netflix complaints
Yes, they were being throttled.Why wouldn't they complain. Consumers flipped their shit when Comcast was messing with torrents,too.

You guys are really retarded overall. What truly happened was the left today is the Republicans ten years ago. Ten years ago Republicans were about mah religion mah burgers and their love of war even if it fucked with the American people. We fucked around during that time.

Today Democrats have become moralfags and self righteous assholes thank to the SJW's and the religion of Marxist/Feminism feelings over facts that has prevented people from being themselves and just fucking around joking. Everything has to have a safe space, you can't say how you don't like something or someone even jokingly without being fired from your job. Today is the same as ten years ago except the left gets a turn of being fucked with. If you don't like it then move to Leddit.

>In 2012, ISPs started failing to maintain their ports leading to Netflix customers unnecessarily suffering frequent buffering

There have been only a few services that have failed the connections of most isps: voice, torrents, and Netflix. Tell me why they failed, and watch as you naively blame the isp.

idiot.

A company complaining to another company. Why should I care? Unless I'm a netflix shill, I have no reason to care why a service I dont use gets throttled by a company who has no obligation to said service. I use isp for email, forums, videos, and porn. If netflix customers want good connections, they should ask netflix to form its own isp instead of piggybacking off an existing one.

Attached: 1519449494659.jpg (995x541, 377K)

>Tell me why they failed, and watch as you naively blame the isp.
You can throw all theories right in the trash, user. First and foremost,we pay for a service that is advertised as being a certain amount of bandwidth. As consumers, we have rights. ISP's have no business deciding how we use that bandwidth.

>ISP's have no business deciding how we use that bandwidth

their business IS deciding how you use bandwidth, because if they didn't, you'd have slow service 24/7 cause jimmy is streaming Wild Girls 5 in the apartment over. I feel like all these people for net neutrality would easily be converted if you just picked up a networking book.