Terminal emulators

well, which one is the best Jow Forums?

Attached: cathode2.jpg (797x521, 224K)

Other urls found in this thread:

lwn.net/Articles/751763/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_terminal
seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Mar/32
linusakesson.net/programming/tty/index.php
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

xterm, it just works and is always available. (same reason I like vi) If I need a dropdown terminal I use tilda.

>xterm
>xterm is bloated and unmaintainable. Here’s an excerpt from the README:

>................Abandon All Hope, Ye Who Enter Here


>This is undoubtedly the most ugly program in the distribution. It was one of
>the first "serious" programs ported, and still has a lot of historical baggage.
>Ideally, there would be a general tty widget and then vt102 and tek4014
>subwidgets so that they could be used in other programs. We are trying to
>clean things up as we go, but there is still a lot of work to do.

>Needless to say things have not changed, it’s still ugly. It has over 65K lines of code and emulates obscure and obsolete terminals you will never need.

>The popular alternative, rxvt has only 32K lines of code. This is just too much for something as simple as a terminal emulator; it’s yet another example of code complexity.

>Terminal emulation doesn’t need to be so complex.

all of them suck
xterm implements more things than urxvt but is slow, shitty and doesn't have text rewrap

Cool Retro Term

Attached: CRT.gif (796x602, 1.46M)

Xterm has the lowest latency
I love that retarded project

rxvt/urxvt period
/thread

st. IT just works. rxvt = bloat, xterm = double bloat

lwn.net/Articles/751763/
st stands for shitty terminal

That's not from the xterm README. That's a suckless blurb for st.

back in my day we had 100+ms latency and we liked it

>terminal autism

I thought this until I tried kitty.
Now it's kitty

Konsole!

Attached: 848px-Mascot_konqi-dev-qt.png (848x1200, 175K)

this

Attached: 220px-KDE_Mascot_Konqi_by_Tyson_Tan.png (220x367, 45K)

Terminator

Attached: IMG_20180225_050855.jpg (1543x2048, 390K)

this

term stands for terminal cancer

This.

emacs's ansi-term mode for programs that require ncurses, shell-mode otherwise.

XTerm 4ever. It never betrayed me and never will.

Attached: XTerm.png (972x613, 3K)

I wish i could go back to konsole, but keyboard-select in urxvt is just too comfy.

Is there any other terminal that lets you select text with keyboard instead of mouse like rxvt does?

Attached: bc7a4ee0e8c95b4996e8852f853dd5cda8b7defc5c8b6d38535bd3a20c0e685e.png (800x400, 21K)

Attached: tools.png (1680x720, 1019K)

kitty

What is this used for?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_terminal

screenfetch mostly
Sometimes neofetch

Cool retro term

>written in java
>eats up your cpu and ram like mad

Just install linux shit head

>xterm
>XTERM
>FUCIOKING XTERM
really negroe?

you realize smaller is better right?

xterm

rxvt-unicode everyday, for everything

I like terminology

Kitty is the only choice.

>Indian software quality
>GPU accelerated
>supports link hints
>supports tabs and splits
>supports ligatures

and st is not so small

proofs

the fucking numbers

Is st bloated????

>takes about 8 seconds to open

what you feebleminded subhumans call bloat--I call power. st may be "minimal" (primitive) but it isn't powerful and it sure as hell isn't performant.

xfce4-terminal

Honestly it's the only terminal that it feels comfortable and fast
xterm feels slow and ugly, urxvt and similar are even worse
>it's libvte based
Unlike gnome-terminal, xfce4-terminal doesn't have the gnome retardation
I like how it rewraps the text when changing zoom level or changing window size

libvte sucks in a lot of ways, mostly because it saves scrollback buffers on disk
>seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Mar/32
but on the other hand I don't have a better solution to suggest and you can always turn of scrollback completely to mitigate this issue
I don't though because I can't use less, head and tail all the time

Software design is not a game of code golf. The simplest solution is not always the most elegant or efficient.

>lwn.net/Articles/751763/
Nice research
I use GVim because I feel latency when using Vim inside an x-terminal
This research confirms it
>just use xterm
Nope sorry, xterm default fonts are butt ugly and unreadable
Once you try to change them to something more readable it becomes slow as molasses

It's funny how ricers prefer to use Vim inside a terminal emulator because
>muh speed
>muh nobloat
when in fact this makes it more bloated and the only reason they do it is because it makes them feel like hackers

GVim + GTK+2 all the way

Unironically gnome-terminal.

I don't even use gnome.

you can make konsole do whatever the fuck you want user

Attached: Screenshot_20180512_153551.png (1366x768, 282K)

Before gnome-terminal, I used urxvt with the "5x7" builtin X unicode font. I tried st and enjoyed it but the patching to configure thing was just too annoying. I like settings.

>FROM THE README

Are you fucking daft

you fuckers, kittt is beautiful, but can't handle otf fonts bold and shit, and since my favorite font droidsans mono nerd font is otf, i can't use it with kitten, common even set handles it like a champ, also the url hints detection is shit, i have a script on st that handles urls much better.

>xterm feels slow
that's ironic considering vte based terminals are the ones with the worst latency

What is the difference between a terminal and a regular monitor?

I know that some of you will hate me.
but emacs (ansi-term or eshell) is nice and just work

terminal is a device that is basically a hardware remote "desktop" where you type in shit and it gets send to the remote machine. Then you get results back. The terminal only handles sending and receiving commands. Monitor can display graphics from local GPU. Terminal doesn't use GPU. It handles text displaying and sending commands on hardware level. Tldr, it's an ssh box.

I've used gnome-terminal, xterm and rxvt.

>What's the difference between them?
Gnome doesn't have a Xresources file, instead it has gui options to customize your terminal. Honestly, I don't give a fuck about gui so it doesn't really matter to me.
Xterm and rxvt are pretty alike and lightweight.

>Which one do you use nowadays?
Nowadays I use rxvt but I don't think it is any better or worse than the others.

Note: Xresources is a text file that contains all the visual settings of your terminal.

it's still faster than suckmuch terminal

>terminal emulator
>TERMINAL
>FUCKING
>EMULATOR
what kind of retard named it that way? They aren't emulating shit, you can work with files in you're /home folder, hell, even in /root

Terminal.app :^)

urxvt is the best terminal overall, and the most lightweight among the non-autistic ones that offer complete functionality.

t. dicklet

95% chance of bait, however..

Look up what a teletype is. That's what tty stands for, and that's what's being emulated.

linusakesson.net/programming/tty/index.php

Attached: 1521289466499.gif (320x214, 2.66M)

>Terminator
Only smart motherfucker in this thread. Everything else in punch card tier.

>xfce4-terminal

>gnome-terminal.

LXTerminal is lighter and similar to these, and good enough

>I don't think you understand how greentext works, m8

Thank you fren!

rxvt-unicode

xfce4-terminal