The year of our GNU, 2018

>the year of our GNU, 2018
>Jow Forums still doesn't support vp9
What is gookmoot's excuse?

Attached: file.png (800x363, 63K)

Other urls found in this thread:

github.com/deterenkelt/Nadeshiko/wiki/Pitfalls-in-VP9
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Not necessary, the site works just fine.

he doesn't care about the site at all

It's either he's too lazy to have vp9 implemented, simply doesn't understand what vp9 is, or is maintaining the status quo because just about any toaster in existence nowadays can handle vp8.

some intern implemented it in the moot days, but left it disabled. all gookmoot has to do is change a line in some config but ching chong no engrish

who the fuck knows, it's completely unreasonable.

>>It's either he's too lazy to have vp9 implemented,
>"implemented"
You mean change the config that blacklists it, and install a copy of ffmpeg that supports it so thumbnailing works?

because that's literally all he'd need to do.

ffmpeg has supported vp9 since 2015, so I don't think that's the issue

Eight chan supports VP9 and MPEG4. What's your excuse for not going there?

it's dead

I'm not a pedophile.

>What is gookmoot's excuse?
GNU's not UNIX

The site's a piece of shit that no one uses.

They shilled way too hard a few years back and I hate shills.

kys halfcha nner, that place's existence is not to be shared

it's an artistic choice to not support vp9

>mpeg4

wew

Can we change to Sorensen then?

what kind of webms can I expect with vp9?

not a fan of either /leftypol/, goons, or FBI COINTELPRO psyops

There isn't a good 4chanX equivalent and my main boards essentially don't exist there because the community is still here.

>what kind of webms can I expect with vp9?
1. Same size twice the quality, or
2. Same size twice the length, or
3. Same quality, half the size, or
4. Same quality, half the length, or
5. Same length, half the size, or
6. Same length, twice the quality

A few months back I compared VP8, VP9 and for giggles MPEG4 at terribly low bitrates. VP9 was indistinguishable from the original, VP8 had noticeable colour artifacts, and MPEG4 looked like bad video in 240p upscaled to 4k.

probably this

they're all a bunch of boomer retards who will ban you for not singing the praises of Trump's zionist foreign policy.

The community. Despite all evidence to the contrary, I still have SOME standards.

the only problem you're not mentioning is, encoding vp9 is a pain in the ass
github.com/deterenkelt/Nadeshiko/wiki/Pitfalls-in-VP9

obv this isnt an excuse for Jow Forums to blacklist it, but the encoder is a piece of shit and basically just self serving google at this point

>MPEG4
I think you're mixing it with the mp4 format using h264 video. MPEG4 video is shit like xvid/divx, and nobody uses that.

html5 video is either h264 (depending on browser/platform), VP8, VP9, Theora (lol), AV1 soon enough, and all using either mp4, webm or ogv as container. For anything else you'd need to use Flash.