FreeBSD: Chose by the biggest technology and entretainment companies, including Apple, Nintendo and Sony as a base for their Operating Systems.
GNU/Linux: Chosen by basement dwellers as their desktop OS, pajeet tier companies like Google as a base for their shitty platforms (Android/ChromeOS), as well by another pajeet company named Microsoft for a pathetic intent of giving a UNIX experience in their trash -tier OS named Windows.
>>How come? If you understood the difference between the BSD license and the GPL you'd have your answer.
Mason Jenkins
>Nothing has ever used slices, ever. Slices are nice
William Morales
They're nice if you're already inside unix. If you're in any other system ever you can't use them at all. They're completely incompatible with standard PC partition systems since the 80s. They're incompatible with uboot and thus arm, too.
Jaxson Harris
BSD is LITERAL cuckoldry
Tyler Jackson
Only developing for BSD makes you a cuck, being the software-bull in this scenario is not a slight.
Austin Brooks
Companies only choose BSD so they don't have to release the code due to the license.
Jaxon Wilson
>They're incompatible with uboot and thus arm, too. Just use a different bootloader :)
Xavier Hall
It's fucking shit The newer versions of FreeBSD don't even boot off of non EFI systems (bios)
Ryan Fisher
Reported to the FBI.
Luis Russell
Why the fuck doesn't BSD work without its own special snowflake boot configuration? Why are they so anal about something that is completely meaningless in current year? MBR? Seriously?