Why is this even allowed?

Why is this even allowed?

Firefox 60 has been very disapointed to me, does anyone have performance issues with it?

Waterfox master race.

Attached: explainthisshit.png (1916x1031, 1.47M)

Other urls found in this thread:

html5test.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

mozillafags will defend this

Sjws ruined the once great firefox

I don't have this problem

Attached: ff.webm (1440x784, 2.85M)

that looks really confy, also, what browser is and how you made the bar so minimal

wall

Firefox
userChrome.css and userContent.css

Ok so click and play, or! even fucking better! Copy link, hit run and paste link... and then play! Because mpv is so awesome!

No I won't.

Firefox is punishing your for watching Babish.

ay ay ay

Mexicano goblin. nobody likes you.

maybe u should have more than 1gb of ram bud this aint 2004

Attached: summer.png (421x464, 247K)

why do you use youtube to jerk off?

user, you know there's actual porn online, right?

Run html5test.com/
Notice how FF 60 has more points, therefore supports more stuff, youtube knows this and load more stuff as is evident by the number of elements blocked by uBlock.
Also
>adminstradore de tareas
>youtube mx
>whataspp
>windows

Why don't you try a site more fit for you like reddit, this is clearly not a place for the technical illiterate.

>too dumb to understand the benefits
That webm is for demonstration. I use a keybind to open mpv.

Well , I run the test and Firefox 60 only has 11 points ahead of waterfox , being cutting edge and all I expected to be close to 100% in the test, that makes it even more disappointing.

Since I don't plan to use those sweet sweet 11 things extra in exchange for 10% of extra CPU use I think I am going to stick with waterfox for the time being.

I enjoy the banter really but I'll lurk and post the shit out of /g for as long as I want my dude

And thank you for the demonstration I really like seeing how other people do their own efficient things

Attached: html5score.png (1916x1050, 183K)

What is YouTube MX

You really don't understand or are just being difficult

>486
I get 466 with Waterfox. How did you score that?

This is the version I use , haven't done anything weird to it

Attached: WFv.png (702x334, 38K)

give it back, la creatura