It's over

it's over

Attached: 76de8f32d2cf7bde9923d8737935baccbd0b52c9.jpg (5600x4360, 2.57M)

man that guy is full-on shekelmaster phenotype.

which one?

>This is what Yanks actually believe

your tears are delicious zuk

>data protection does not apply to small and medium companies whose core income is not from selling data
>so let's give more power to politicians anyway because they would never sell in the black market they would actually write a 30k word essay to the european parliament asking special permission because they follow the law xD

Attached: 1515465568173.jpg (555x445, 36K)

>demand
>regulate

hmm, one of these sounds effective and realized, and the other sounds impotent

Regulation with 55k words is a paradise for lawyers to find loopholes
but i'm not worried since it's the eurotrash taxpayer who will pay for the fees

Attached: Jewish-Lawyer-ad.jpg (2048x1536, 1.13M)

>This is what Yanks actually believe
Nice 2018 reddit meme, btw.

Attached: le 1% face.jpg (640x550, 18K)

Checkmate, atheist.

Attached: checkmate.jpg (540x355, 20K)

>Internet

>Meaningful Privacy

>Pick one

Hitler was right.

>55,000 words
it's a 100 page pdf of which about 30 pages are explanations as to why the articles exist, the last 60 pages cover the articles but they have to declare and define a bunch of redundant shit which is generally considered industry standard that companies will already know but needs to be formalised in legislation for non-industry people
as far as legalese goes it's an extremely approachable bit of legislation and even if you're a brainlet there's plenty of decent guidance and writeups about the gdpr from the organisations that will be fining you if you fuck it up, their goal is to get you complying with the law, not to punitively fine people
>vague words
european law is generally descriptive so that it can be figured out in the courts rather than prescriptive where a legal case can be made or broken based on strict interpretation of the law, this does the opposite of give power to the politicians as legal cases can be argued based on what the intent of the law was and how companies followed the intent of the law
>allowing companies to fine
countries can already fine eu companies for data protection violations, the ico in the uk hasn't even fined in 0.1% of reported cases and when they do fine it's not only public record but generally for a good reason - sql injection leading to a break of 16k bank records? you bet your ass you're getting a £400,000 fine, breaking the law by failing to inform people after a breach? have a £1,000 fine, don't do it again
>union members are able to investigate private citizens
nice fucking bait m8, union members refers to member countries of the european union, you're literally complaining that a country like france will be fining you for violations in france rather than the eu fining you

>country like france will be fining you for violations in france rather than the eu fining you
>EU parliament acting as a mediator for state conflicts is positive
This is why I lost faith in the west way back in 2005

Top one

>it's another episode of americans pretend to be the victims because they like to be the eternal cucks

*blocks your path*

Attached: basedwaterfix.png (1921x1050, 109K)

i want to fucking die, wront thread

The EU would be so much better without the Germans. Shulz, Selmayr etc.

Which language is this? Jesus Christ...

I crave for more dataminers' sweet tears.
t. inhabitant of the based Yuroland