Evil companies

All ISPs, but in particular these guys. Without you even noticing, they've bought up about half the Internet. Not to mention all the lobbying against net neutrality.

Attached: Verizon.png (1280x287, 20K)

Even small companies seem as inherently evil as the big ones though, their ultimate goal is to make you an eternal buypig using deceptive as-legally-possible advertising and social engineering. Or to make you into a product itself.

Isn't capitalism great?

I remember a thread where some guy said that capitalism would work great if all the marketing people were shot. I can't say I disagree.

OP pic and Microsoft

All of them.

Don't be evil™

EIN VOLK
EIN REICH
EIN FUHRER

Attached: google flag.jpg (1000x600, 143K)

This. Profit is theft. There is no ethical capitalism.

Attached: 1527733698463.png (1920x1200, 80K)

Google
Facebook
Amazon

edgy

Da, tovarishch!

That little semitic runt (rat) expanded his humble data collection advertising scheme to enable mass scale systematic defamation and became a greedy multinational master merchant head. This is your average big jew. They come in all sizes, and a lot of them play in the same dirty pool, it's in their books. These are just mitsvahs. Thousands of years. Thousands.

Next presidential election will be about this issue.

>isn't human nature great
we'd have the same shit under communism, except the corporate dickheads who do this would instead have a government badge and we'd all be hungry

plus ever antisocial on this board would be in a gulag
rat fucking commies

Attached: 1508374033274.jpg (971x921, 194K)

>implying there's ever been ethical communism either

also
>this
go back to plebbit, late stage faggot

Attached: 1510104624298.gif (720x480, 126K)

Does being retarded hurt?

Attached: free-market-capitalism-is-just-the-state-of-nature-7932838.png (500x436, 24K)

>we'd all be hungry
You mean like in most of the capitalist world?

Attached: ijdtv5jokfbz.png (1079x1133, 264K)

You can criticize capitalism without being a Marxist retard. There is a case to be made for decentralized planning with modern technology, actually.
Not worth discussing with the mutts awake, though.

Not to mention modern technology solves the calculation problem.

Attached: 41PiyqApQLL._SX332_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (334x499, 28K)

this poor meme of a poor argument contradicts itself by including the word "human" in addition to "nature"

>inb4 you were just pretending to be retarded

I'm pretty sure that's a consent issue
0/10

Animals do have concepts of property though. They claim resources and land, except they just use violence to resolve any disputes.

Tell me more...

Attached: n5n6jxkuEm1svqa72o1_500.png (500x667, 36K)

grug no like gubmint gubmint not make him iphone or starbugs coffee on way to work cave corbershins are grug real friend

maga

Attached: 1511458063923.png (645x729, 145K)

>humans could not have survived without cooperation
select cooperation, not everyone is useful. many are useless and detrimental. altruism can be detrimental.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_Altruism

most people in the world for all of history have been hungry. And if you're going hungry in a first world country then you're honestly retarded and you deserve it.
in case you haven't realized the modern world is the peak of civilization. you're willing to sacrifice everything for an unworkable, unattainable hypothetical ideal b/c you're an underage w/ no real word experience.
Or you're a butthurt rust developer.

criticize away. oh wait, you're just talking shit w/ no argument. nice

wow that picture did a great job of not addressing the argument at all. pic related is for you

Can you make an argument for yourself or will you just post snarky comments and have someone else's shitty pics make flawed arguments for you?

Attached: 1524732152756.gif (290x200, 968K)

>thread about literal failures of capitalism
>people come in to unironically defend capitalism

Attached: 1527211919805.jpg (900x789, 139K)

Humans evolved by killing each other. There have been multiple "catastrophic" events where the male gene pool in various regions was cut down to like 1/20th of the original population. This happens in animal social circles too to some extent. That's not to say cooperation didn't play a big role but the cooperation is limited in scope and it's usually for the sake of one's one benefit, usually at the expense of or to oppose another group. That's why for most of history massive, stable nations like the US didn't exist. It was much smaller groups which were even less interconnected than the states and usually just territorial powers or groups with shared lineage (coming back to the fact that humans fucking slaughtered each other routinely and shrunk the gene pool). Even now we have nations and borders and we'll provide social services paid by taxes only for fellow citizens and on a smaller scale for neighbors and family and friends.

unlike with socialism and communism the failures of capitalism aren't critical.

It's because you have nothing interesting to say

if you think an economic system is to blame, much less one whose standards and ideals arguably we're not even living up to right now, for immoral and ambitious people concentrating power and designing products and services which will facilitate the securement of said power, youre a retarded underage who can't into basic logic and you need to return to plebbit right now.

Ummm, tell me more...

Attached: de732d05dbc0c4d7af03158b5375863b.jpg (623x960, 157K)

please fuck off with your shitty bait

notice how none of this is stopping capitalism. meanwhile with socialism the tinniest bump in the road results in catastrophic failure.

I know this is bait, capitalism is far from ideal but still has managed to sustain populations much better than communism has. And if you want the simple answer, "well if you think that number is bad, it would be doubled or tripled for communism, even after accounting for the purges communist leaders are so fond of"

Attached: google.jpg (773x582, 34K)

break them up already

>criticize away. oh wait, you're just talking shit w/ no argument. nice
That's not how academic discourse works.
ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/socialism_book/new_socialism.pdf

>capitalism is far from ideal but still has managed to sustain populations much better than communism has
How does not liking capitalism automatically make you a Marxist-Leninist? That's like saying everyone skeptical of veganism is morbidly obese.

>destroyed
this is the correct answer
it would be enough to charlie hebdo the main offices of twatter, faceberg and alphabet, while also targeting the buses of employees working for them. It will take a carnage to make them understand that you DO NOT PLAY CENSOR, and if you do you will lose your life, your family and anything you hold dear

I live in a social-captitalist country (Norway) and the only difference is really that the government takes 30-40% of my money + tax everything else so in reality they take like 70%.

Sure we get free health-care, but that's really it

>BUT YOU GET FREE EDUCATION TOO!!!
not really, only if you're a city kid who grew up in the cities and didn't have to move in order to attend UNI. Most of us have to live on loans in order to pay rent during uni/college years, so there's not really any difference.

Too late, the NSA already controls or gets information from google, facebook, etc.
Skynet IS the government.

I'd definitely put Netflix up there as one of the greatest threats to digital freedom. Allowing one company to filter and dictate the media that you consume leaves great concern for propaganda being pushed onto you and shaping your world view. Really the internet has failed miserably in the 21st century. We need a decentralised p2p global network that can somehow resist artificial or accidental thought control, while also applying a small model of moral decency.

Any company that makes money from selling media via paid digital distribution such as Valve or CDPR or Apple or Amazon