Everyone circle jerk hate on GitHub

>I need a gui for git
>I need a web based gui for git
>I need to host my own web based gui for git
>I need specialized cloud storage for git

Attached: 1526232524405.png (380x349, 77K)

Just install git, why would you need some bloated interface?

unironically this

I think everyone in this thread works on projects alone and does not cooporate with others regularly.

github.com/gogs/gogs

use gogs

Are you implying that you're running GitLab on the same server as your application? Why would you do this? Are you retarded?

Jow Forums mostly didn't ever like sjwhub though when a project is shared, it is on github. It was always proprietary so the possibility of getting your data sold to any party was there from the start.
GitLab might be open source but it has a bad interface and is unstable, lost all files in the past, is hosted on goolag cloud and it is the reddit choice and so is all of this #mortymovestoX
Github is still the go-to for noobs and big corps and I doubt google will remove their projects.
To share projects you autist

Do modern sysadmins really think it's acceptable to have 1 service per physical machine? Why shouldn't you be able to host 2 services. What are server machines, on par with fucking iPhones?

Attached: buy-two-ipads-multitask.jpg (500x500, 88K)

>fossil has built-in ad-hoc web server
why are kernel devs so obsessed with making things as complicated as possible? they are some of the whitest people I've ever seen

even the demo server is fast, damn

isolation is gud, your server should he hypervisor and run multiple systems with single service each

Just run gogs or gitbucket

I'm not a sys admin, I'm a software eng. Why the fuck would I want to create a network bottleneck by having my microserice and CICD service on the same box?
And spinning up and down resources in cloud providers is piss easy now a days.

Makes life easier.
Think why docker is a thing: 1 task 1 environment.

>github.com

Attached: 1526943711269.jpg (760x430, 160K)

>physical machine
>you're running GitLab on the same server as your application?
If you're running 2 services in 2 hypervisors on 1 machine, they're still on the same server. The fact that gitlab uses so many resources on its own is the problem.

>And spinning up and down resources in cloud providers is piss easy now a days.
It's just as easy locally too.
makejail.sh
rmjail.sh
givesshaccess.sh

I keep thinking thats the icon for google firebase thing

Attached: touchicon-180.png (180x180, 8K)

>If you're running 2 services in 2 hypervisors on 1 machine, they're still on the same server.
Agreed but I'm advising against that for the most part.

>The fact that gitlab uses so many resources on its own is the problem
Agreed but it offers a lot of QOL improvements where I'm okay with that risk. If I need a much more performant CICD pipeline I'll either use something like Travis or write my own. But I'm not using GitLab thinking it's the most performant piece of software. I'm using it because it saves developer time.
Everytime I hear people bitching about how resource hungry some piece of software I feel like they don't generally understand that developer times is worth more than resource costs.

Do you even microservice brah?

mine is running just fine on a Rpi zero w

This

There is no reason to use any 'cloud' git company when you can run a local server and there even exists a cookie-cutter web front end for it if you want.

There's also Bitbucket/Mercurial or even OpenCVS

Has there ever been a good Ruby project?

There was probably like 20,000 people at most that tried to switch to it.

And they're "switching" is probably importing their projects for 3 days while the cry that the world is ending and realize that it actually isn't.

I've used GitLab for a school group project I was supposed. The teacher made a API that
would grab the words from these word lists that was quite large and allow use to interface with them in the program.

Anyway, my first attempt of just iterating over it was slow as shit and affected the machine learning training time (it already takes like 2 days).

So I try to use hashing and I'd figure I'd just hard-code the max number of words of each list. It kept crashing over and over again and I just gave up after having literally done 100% of the other work on the project despite being in a group of 4 people. I'm not even sure how exactly I was going to do it.

The project was using machine learning grab personal names from a block of text.

>To share projects you autist
git is a distributed and decentralized version control system, it has sharing built into its core.

Mercurial, you dumb technigger. Or maybe Fossil, I've seen a lot of recommendations, but Mercurial has a way bigger userbase, more tools and documentation etc.

The fuck does gitlab, shit or not, have to do with your teacher's slow word cloud API? Why not grab all the data before you start training?

>bird.jpg
install fossil or get shanked

OP have you tried Gitea? It seems a better alternative

>OpenCVS
Every time I read some comparison of version systems, people say not to use CVS nor SVN.

Just found out about wikimedia's git thing, phabricator
phabricator.wikimedia.org/

It's DB is based in Redis, which loads the entire DB into RAM for max speed. So your 8 GB of RAM isn't nearly enough to run Gitlab.

Gitweb (the official git web interface) is unironically all you need and is fast as fuck.

Attached: git-instaweb.png (800x558, 67K)

Could this be real?
Will the Microsoft acquisition teach developers how to host their own shit?

Not everyone wants to clone every repo on the planet.

>Looks like Google code

Gitlab is pretty notorious for being the slowest of the available providers. Get what you pay for, I guess.

install gitea

Attached: ml606tpowaw01.png (1280x720, 657K)

>Code monkey Ruby on Rails aplication

>not using the free gitlab cloud
what an idiot you are lol

We have been using our own virtual GitLab server since a year and the overall performance is quite good (of course, you need a server that isn't a potato connected to a keyboard). GitLab is G.O.A.T.

I always thought it was Mercurial's UI because of Mozilla's Hg repository.

Attached: 1291157170904.jpg (210x230, 46K)

>some hobbiest faggotry that will be hacked the moment it gains marketshare

Can it be shrunk? Replaced with something else?

Sad, hope they can speed things up, especially if you disable some features?

>Meme criticism

I like having my own hosted solution

That's the problem, my "server" is only an AM1.

fossil-scm.org
chiselapp.com

I really don't get it. Just use git. Not gitlab, not gog, not any other shitty web gui wrapper. Vanilla git.

Attached: 1526756368685.jpg (525x429, 62K)

less lines of code less bugs
also what even is there to hack

Yeah just stop using it
The only point of these things is collaboration with many people and if you're single person self hosting it you're probably not doing that.

It'll be 2-3 friends collaborating.

Ruby on Rails, what do you expect?

This. Decent compromises if you even need a web interface.

They're not as minimalist as cgit and not nearly as heavy as gitlab.

>less lines of code less bugs
Except it is written in C, which means more lines of code and more bugs per line of code.
>also what even is there to hack
All parts facing the internet. It will be riddled with all kinds of overflows, just like any other C software that isn't audited on a regular base.

>t. retarded rustfag

/
FUCKING
THREAD
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH