HAHAHAHA - microsoft now marks as spam every comment that puts moving to gitlab in a good light

I'm pretty sure the sway people marked those as spam, not microsoft.

this is not reddit, I guess some people like that kind of boards like you but I don't

The whole issue was to move from gh to gl and was created by the main dev of sway SirCmpwn, why in the hell would they mark as a spam an opinion they asked for.

Attached: 1528618978617.jpg (760x570, 93K)

>This is a discussion for the sway team, and has no bearing on end users. The opinions of those who don't have some stake in sway/wlroots aren't helpful at all.

why dont they intergrate it into windows store? Fuck sake their ecosystem is so fragmented and broken
t. w10 fag

>this is not reddit
True, there's barely any revenge porn. :)
Now fuck off.

>Leave your opinions here
>Needs more discussion, folks. Speak up.

>go to a store
>yell down every aisle that everyone should go to this other store
>what the fuck why are you escorting me outside? Am I being detained?

>Use service
>Discussion about using another service
>Banned from using first service for said discussion

As a biz owner I see the wrong in such story line, maybe niggers like you don't comprehend.

>mark every URL as spam
>hahhaha its gitlab MS is scared hahaha

how dumb are you, OP?

Attached: 1510458045240.png (498x399, 315K)

Why would you let people in whose sole goal is to get people to leave your store or service? You clearly don't own a business you fucking tard.

>Discussion about using other service
You know this isn't the reality, but you still posted anyways.

microsoft hasn't acquired Github yet

If you checked the thread you can see how that's the only post with a link from the user and all of his comments are marked as spam, you could of shut up and nobody would know now that you have severe autism.

Well, I mean, it is spam....

Yes they did, Chris Wanstrath is only an interim right now.

>Owner of repo asks if the open source repo needs to move to another site.
>User of repo answers to that exact question.
>Spam literally means unsolicited electronic mesage.
>The response of the user was solicited.

>>Owner of repo asks if the open source repo needs to move to another site.
You're going to just lie when the post is right there in the image?

The owner already looked into it and says it's not a good idea to move and some retard comes in to shill some tool that'll probably break everything. It's literally a perfect example of spam. Owner says "Nah, we won't do it" and paid shill #1000002 comes in "achsully you should". Gitlab is shit by the way, yet there are countless tards shilling for it

Microsoft is trying to break its record in the 00's of buying communities and murdering them. FOSStards are being absolute shitters about it. I'll side with MS on this based on that the modern incarnation isn't the MS of the 90's and GitHub would collapse on its own without a potential suitor. There has already been plenty of ink spilled as to why MS is the least worst suitor against Google, Apple, Oracle, and IBM.

Attached: 125976868753.jpg (640x480, 55K)

>Eh, for now let's just stay here.

>(you)The owner already looked into it and says it's not a good idea to move

>The plan is to move sway and wlroots to sr.ht

They are moving the repo, not to gitlab but to sr.ht.
Looks like the only shill nigger or the microsoft retard here is (you)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halloween_documents

>literally 20 year old pre-trial documents
Try again.

stallman.org/microsoft.html

>yell
How is this a valid analogy? He created an issue, yelling would imply he somehow spammed lots of discussions with. If you don't want to hear people talk about moving to gitlab, don't open issues about it.

The right analogy would be:
>3 people are in a store talking about whether they should go to another store
>They get banned from the store

Give you fair credit, this sucks significantly less than the previous post.
>patent weilding
Name a potential suitor that does NOT do this.
>non-free, proprietary OS
I'll give him that for whatever it's worth.
>China
Anyone who wants to do international business there has to put up with this. Shareholders won't tolerate MS leaving this money on the table.
>OOXML
Just because MS didn't play the game the way IBM wanted to doesn't mean they did anything wrong. This was a result of IBM's gambit to destroy Office by making its file formats illegal. Microsoft figured out how to build, deploy, and ratify an open standard without taking years. That was some serious legal sleeze out of IBM and they still managed to lose.

Still not very compelling after seeing Google club Samsung with patents.

Attached: 1197130724572.jpg (509x435, 41K)

The deal has not passed review yet, the acquisition will probably not be completed until the end of the year.

>this is not reddit
I wish.

this

>Name a potential suitor that does NOT do this.
microsoft is not suing, he is threatening to sue, when they sue they usually lose.
>Anyone who wants to do international business there has to put up with this. Shareholders won't tolerate MS leaving this money on the table.
as a shareholder myself for multiple biz I would go with whatever doesn't suck the government dick first. and being an authoritarian government it's even worse.
>Just because MS didn't play the game the way IBM wanted to doesn't mean they did anything wrong. This was a result of IBM's gambit to destroy Office by making its file formats illegal. Microsoft figured out how to build, deploy, and ratify an open standard without taking years. That was some serious legal sleeze out of IBM and they still managed to lose.
The ISO didn't want to accept it, after some pressure on nations the necessary amount of them voted in favor, OOXML itself is propietary and uses shady DRM techniques, never seen anything like that in other recognized standard.

Attached: 1521328977660.jpg (720x960, 96K)