I heard the AMD series, radeon r5 2600 in particular consumes a fuckload of power...

I heard the AMD series, radeon r5 2600 in particular consumes a fuckload of power, thus making my energy bill go through the roof.
Should i take the intel pill and buy a i5 instead? Any other options?

Attached: 95389.png (650x300, 32K)

Other urls found in this thread:

techspot.com/review/1614-ryzen-2600/page4.html
tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-2700x-review,5571-12.html
pcgamer.com/overclocked-core-i9-7980xe-hits-61ghz-and-pulls-1000-watts/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Yes, but I recommend a skylake-x instead, if you are really going for efficiency.

is it on par with the 2600?

AMD series are either superior to Intel in terms of power requirements or on par, depending on task. You can see it at your graph, check out 1400 vs 8350K.

2400G has built in Vega graphics FYI, not some Iris shit.

nigga what the fuck i aint spending 1k on a processor

Kaby lake-x then.

yeah but both of those are really old, look at the 2400 v the 8400 i5

>really old
Older than you, right?

>somehow die shrink should add power with unchanged arch
Also cannot see your point. 8400 has unrealistic turbo compared to TDP. Whenever Ryzen is limited by memory latency it will also consume less. 8400 gets blown by 2600 in every non-latency-sensitive task and also does not have cum under the lid.

>A CPU makes your energy bill shoot through the roof
I'm curious as to how much you pay in general.

>2600 does not have cum under the lid

>Another Day, Another Intel CPU Security Hole: Lazy State

Intel a shit
every day a new security issue is found and every day it seems to be related to performance tricks. by the end of the year your new Intel cpu will be performing like it's equivalent from a decade past.

He based his expectation on the intel showcase with the 28 core cpu.

1k for the whole build
r5 2600 gtx 1050-1060 cant decide yet, gigabyte aorus x470, 8gb ddr3

just wanted to make sure of stuff before i make the purchase, dont wanna take the jew-pill and throw money randomly

>8gb ddr3
kek

yeah, hyperx fury 8gb dd3, whats the prob?

techspot.com/review/1614-ryzen-2600/page4.html

it only consumes more power if you overclock it aggressively.

This is /sqt/ tier. Fucking pcpartpicker would flag this. You can't put ddr3 in any ryzen mobo.

this will not cost you more than a few cents a year, just buy the AMD

I have a feeling you don't really look up what you are buying, ryzen never supported ddr3.

>radeon r5 2600

Attached: 1510111541216.jpg (1090x1200, 117K)

what the fuck i built this in partpicker and i didnt get any warnings
holy fuk
what should i get then?

Attached: 35376898_1792634167446207_2030730897703043072_n.jpg (421x460, 30K)

ddr 4 of course.

if you are worrying about a 65 TDP processor shooting your power bill through the roof maybe you shouldn't even upgrade your computer in the first place

jesus christ the fucking state of /v/ incels

could you please elaborate why an intel processor would be better in the same price range because I am really curious actually

A brain and reading comprehension.

kek

Geforce 8700k beats radeon 2600 in every game.

It's not that, the 2600 is unbeatable at that price range. The problem is you being that fucking stupid, it's not "Radeon" r5 2600, it's Ryzen 2600.

Radeon comes from the AMD GPU's.

>branch prediction
>performance tricks
The absolute state of Jow Forums

trips o' truth

>1T
Nice meme, Pajeet.
tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-2700x-review,5571-12.html

Attached: INTEL HOUSEFIRES.png (1422x1440, 269K)

>radeon 2600

Attached: 253023-thinking-young-business-man-smart-casual-Stock-Photo.jpg (1300x866, 153K)

also new AMD iGPUs are Vega, not Radeon, OP is plain retarded.

>Geforce 8700k

Attached: 1483155766217.jpg (979x832, 440K)

Intel consumes more power past 3.5ghz, hell the quad core 7700K eats more at stock than the eight core 2700X

Attached: 28965892365.png (500x533, 66K)

Where is power/performance?

You might be just as retarded as OP tho
> pic related

Attached: wew.png (1000x559, 185K)

>gaymen benchmark FPS list
>compares a bunch of $1k processors all with as many threads and liquid nitrogen cooling / chillers etc. no limit to budget

>power consumption benchmark list
>compares dual cores to AMD's same chips

wew lad

At what task? The only place where the Intel chips could possibly compete is
>muh videogaymes
at 720p. Any other task we already know the Ryzen chips to be faster AND more power efficient.

thx for a real fucking graph with real CPUs on it.
hopefully OP gets banned

>hopefully OP gets banned
this.

>Geforce 8700k
>Radeon 2600

It's just shitposting, newfag

cant stop me gay nerds, im back to Jow Forums now

I've been on Jow Forums and Jow Forums since you had to get your parents permission to post, kiddo

ryzen, someone got an R7 1700 to consume ~45W at 3.0 GHz on all 8 cores. Average is 100 watts at 3.6 GHz on all 8 cores.

Attached: 03 (1).png (500x365, 81K)

IHS is soldered on Ryzen. No cum

>~45W at 3.0 GHz on all 8 core
damn, that would be the perfect 45W laptop.

My electrical bill is less than $30/mo and my i5 3570k is less efficient than an r5 2600

If you really cared about power usage you would be manually undervolting and everything, which usually AMD cpus respond better to.

The 2700x is the cream of the crop tho. Noting competes with the price and the multicore performance.

Just wait till the 7nm TSMC Ryzen 3000 series chips come this time next year.

The APUs use thermal grease, other ryzen chips are soldered.

just let him do this guys
we'll laught later when he will be posting pink wojacks and crying

meanwhile at intel...

Attached: overclocked-7980xe-power.jpg (700x486, 38K)

Just under volt retards

Thats the old record.

There's no way it does 92 at idle rofl wtf

2600 is not an APU

FUCKING HELL

>"Now here's where things get crazy. A look at the Core i9-7980XE's power consumption when running at 5.5Ghz shows around 70 amps being sucked through the +12V rail, most of which goes right to the CPU. That means the CPU is drawing around 840W, even though the vCore is sitting at a relatively tame (when it comes to extreme overclocking) 1.45V. At 5.8GHz and 6GHz, wattage jumps to 1,000W."

pcgamer.com/overclocked-core-i9-7980xe-hits-61ghz-and-pulls-1000-watts/

> 18 cores at 4,9GHz
> 845W
By using simple math, we can conclude that the 28 core Intel CPU at 5GHz will consume at least 1,341W (top kek).

Imagine all the heat.

well, they were running a 1600W PSU with only the 28c monster and a rx570

Don't forget the chiller rated for 1700w used on the 28c chip at computex.

>r5 2600 in particular consumes a fuckload of power
it doesn't. don't know what you mean by "fuckload", though. Less than a old-school lightbulb idle and about three old-school lightbulbs at full load ain't "a fuckload". And it uses less than any 2 year old CPU from Intel or AMD. It's also a rather small part of the system compared to a modern GPU.

As for your stupid question, should you buy a Intel i5 instead due to power concerns? There's difference between what CPU you pick (i3 uses less than a i7, r3 less than a r7) so go with a weak CPU if you want less power consumption. Which brand you buy does not fucking matter. Just figure out what offers best price/performance at your desired wattage and price-point.

Are you retarded?
>Radeon CPU
>2600 is really old

Put me in the screencap

the Intel XCC die is 698mm2, at 1341W this results in a heat flux of 1.92 W/mm2 or 1921203 W/m2

At 1 AU (the earths orbit) the total (all frequencies) light output of the sun is 1361 W/m2. To get 1921203 W/m2 we'd need to go to 0.0266 AU or 97% closer to the sun. This is only around 4 million km from the Sun. This is inside the Corona of the sun, or the outer atmosphere. The Sun itself has a radius of 0.7 million km. Mercury orbits at 58 million km.

Its like having a little piece of the sun in your home pretty much.

>Cares about non-mining computer energy usage
>Leaves AC on all day
>Uses any cookware

How drastic is your financial situation for that to be your penny to pinch?

That's pretty fukken extreme

Attached: >powerful intel demonstration.jpg (960x523, 78K)

Or that that wasnt even enough and they still had to pump cool air into the case

Better than intel. The only practically limiting factor for Ryzen is memory latency and whenever it's the bottleneck the CPU consumes less because it executes less.

>at wall
Do you know how to read?

the 7980 is probably using 650-700w while the system is bleeding out 100-150. The rest is from the conversion inefficiency.

None of it matters! I NEED it for (((MEGATASKING)))

I mean I know you're trolling, but 18 cores at 280W at around 3.2-3.5Ghz stock on all core stresstest is pretty impressive in terms of power/watt compared to even like a 2800X. It ain't no threadripper though.

This is the correct post. Everyone else needs to fuck off and die.

Do you niggers even know how much electricity costs? Any processor on the market is a hat on a horse (except the 5ghz 28 core 1.5kW housefire) and you wont even see the difference on your electric bill if you tried. The intel housefires might actually register a blip depending on your cooling/OC solution.

it's a 65w cpu. wtf you talking about?