Why is it harder for a machine to simulate human behavior than it is for a human to simulate machine behavior?

why is it harder for a machine to simulate human behavior than it is for a human to simulate machine behavior?

Attached: maxresdefault[1].jpg (1469x877, 149K)

Because humans are too dumb yet to make the machines do exactly that.
But soon.

so what would happen if a machine is capable of human-like independent thinking? would it find goals or meaning?

Nah it will fuck stacy and bully you to suicide.

human make computer, have instruction
computer not make human, have not instruction
shocking truth!

>why is it harder for a machine to simulate human behavior than it is for a human to simulate machine behavior?
Because a human is orders of magnitude more complicated then the machine.
Have you looked at the robots of Boston Dynamics, getting a robot to walk as stable as a human is already ridiculously hard.

Nobody knows, I doubt that it is even possible and if it is we should keep away from it.

Both excel at different tasks.

Machines can follow a pattern really fast.
Machines can repeat actions accurately.
Machines are strong and tireless.

Humans can learn after one single example. And then extrapolate it to other cases.
Humans are naturally dexterous.
Humans are naturally good at image recognition.
Humans do not require additional programming.


It's actually the things that come naturally to us that machines suck at. While things that appear complicated to us, are easy for machines.
Ask a machine to do some gardening and he'll have an impossible time.
Ask a human to do some accounting or precision work and the odds are he does it wrong.

so machines are good at following instructions while humans are good at making them? what happens when you have both?

>what happens when you have both?
Posthuman utopia. Embrace the future. Transcend the flesh.

>so machines are good at following instructions
How did you even get that from his post?
Machines can only understand the most simple instructions.

>what happens when you have both?
Death for the ones who haven't got both.

How are humans good at simulating machiene behaviour? We used them specifically for things the humans can't do.

Because we haven't figured out how to make them simulate us because we don't understand us yet. It took us billions of years to become like this, have some patience.

Attached: are you not entertained.gif (492x305, 318K)

i thought the whole concept of a machine was that they're infinitely precise at following instructions but infinitely stupid when it comes to adjusting for change of conditions.

>i thought the whole concept of a machine was that they're infinitely precise at following instructions
Which means that the instructions have to be extremely precise and thus extremely basic.

>but infinitely stupid when it comes to adjusting for change of conditions.
They can't do things they weren't programmed to do.

>How are humans good at simulating machiene behaviour?
Simulating a basic CPU isn't particularly hard, it just is really slow.

Artificial CONSCIOUSNESS will never exist. AI as people imagine is a meme. Machines will never have literal souls.

>waaaah you spiritualist nutbag
Pssst, nothing personell.

The created can never outsmart the creator. There's no getting out of the matrix. Deal with it.

>souls
>matrix
lol

because humans made the machine

Natural consciousness is only a figment of your imagination

why is it harder for a retard to simulate normal behavior than it is for a normal person to simulate retarded behavior?

>why is it harder for a hammer to simulate human behavior than it is for a human to simulate hammer behavior?

Attached: c639f708b4e640a1763ce29a9eb75da1.jpg (236x322, 19K)

because we know how to learn

Humans are erratic and liars.

>souls
There is no such things.

Because humans are non deterministic machines while (((current))) machines are deterministic. It's easier for a non deterministic machine to simulate a deterministic machine than the other way around

>humans are non deterministic machines
please insert proofs

Its not that they only understand simple instructions, its that they follow instructions exactly

Because machines don't let emotion interfere with their thought process. Say, for instance, you fed it crime stats and asked it to determine which race is most likely to commit crime, it would come back with the result of blacks. If you ask some general goy the same thing they'll tell you that statistics can't be trusted because it shows black people in a negative light.
What the likes of Jewgle are trying to do is create is a machine that can work objectively while running off purely subjective inputs, and it will never ever work, not in our lifetime at least. Jewgle do this with their own algorithm and it's why the search engine is becoming less and less useful. A couple of years ago they announced how they had changed the algorithm, for the search engine, where the Holocaust™ was concerned because it was bringing up results for Holocaust™ denial. The problem was they also said they had changed it so that people searching for Holocaust™ denial related interests would instead be given Holocaust™ (((facts))) instead. Ask it to define semitism and the first result is the definition of anti-semitism (if you bother to check the definition of 'semitism' you'll find out the definition of 'anti-semitism' doesn't in any way relate to what is defined as semitism. But Jews have that habit of just defining things however they want, like homophobia, even though a hatred doesn't stem from a fear and even if it were a fear there's nothing irrational about wanting avoid potential male rapists who have more diseases than your average black drug addict, but like I say >Jews).
Goys are easy to manipulate because most of them run purely on emotion, but a machine doesn't. It asks you for a straight question and gives you a straight answer. This is the real (((problem))) (((they))) are trying to deal with.
Feel free to prove me wrong.

...

can you predict with 99% accuracy what any given human will do? :^)))

Why did you make this post user?

biological privilege

based Chaika

This. People who think androids/AI are human and should be treated as such suffer from a mental illness and need treatment. Which is why I always laugh at games like Detroit: Become Human as the entire premise is nonsensical. You are more likely to have fairies become real yet if you point out this fact to stupid nerds they unleash their autistic rage as they think their shitty scifi genre fiction is "realistic".

Attached: 1507174979836.png (256x256, 119K)

Imagination comes from a natural conscious, so your point is self defeating.

>Machines will never have literal souls.

Considering you don't have one either, what's your point?

The concern isn't the machines themselves, but the moralfags who would immediately junp to the machines have human rights conclusion as soon as any hint of sentience appears. At best, it'll be a huge pain in the ass for any sort of AI development, and in the worst case they'd be able to gain control given enough time this way

machines are fast and dumn, humans are slow and smart

so...