Cryptography thread: LINE crypto integrity just got busted

eprint.iacr.org/2018/668

Attached: line-crypto-not-so-good.gif (500x281, 670K)

Other urls found in this thread:

cs.umd.edu/~jkatz/imc.html
crypto.stanford.edu/~dabo/cryptobook/
libgen.pw/item/detail/id/5a1f054c3a044650f50e92ad
old.reddit.com/r/crypto/comments/8bynkk/tutorial_on_security_proofs/dxb0uxu/?context=1
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Any actual programs that use this?
>East Asia

Reminder that there's still no decent pirated copy with pictures that aren't thumbnails of Bruce Schneier's Applied Cryptography 2nd Edition on the Internet.

ugh this quality sucks
isn't that book outdated though? isn't Cryptography Engineering a replacement for it?

I've got that book on one of my shelves right now, but it's ancient, dog-eared, is only still there because it's holding something up, and has a shit-ton of "this is broken/wrong/why, you goof" annotations in it. I'm not about to upload it to the internet so a ton of people can use the outdated, times-were-different-then stuff in it which they really oughtn't.

Schneier is lovely, but that book has aged incredibly poorly.

Try something actually good and much more modern, like maybe the Guide to Elliptic Curve Cryptography (Hankerson, Menezes, Vanstone) [2004] ISBN 978-0-387-95273-4 DOI 10.1007/b97644

forgot pic

Attached: schneier-appl-crypt.png (1138x517, 136K)

afaik this is recommended beginner material cs.umd.edu/~jkatz/imc.html

crypto.stanford.edu/~dabo/cryptobook/
read this instead megaloretard

isn't this one for their advanced course?

LINE is quite a popular messenger with weebs and in .jp, partly because of network effect but mostly because of cute stickers. E2E encryption was a tacked-on-afterthought.

Proof, btw. Now it's going back on the shelf before stuff falls down.

Attached: IMG_20180713_203716.jpg (1024x1284, 431K)

Don't see a proper copy of this one either.

It's inferior to Boneh & Shoup anyway.

>weebs and in .jp
and hate tech-retarded japanese people so much.

libgen.pw/item/detail/id/5a1f054c3a044650f50e92ad

cryptography is a hoax. computers are insecure. prove me wrong

let `a` and `b` be one bit numbers
`a⊕b = 1`
now give me `a` and `b` values faggot

There are 3 possible combinations since addition in Z2 is commutative. Thus...

Is this user lying or?

well, here's an opinion from a professional:
old.reddit.com/r/crypto/comments/8bynkk/tutorial_on_security_proofs/dxb0uxu/?context=1

But it's not even finished?

It's still far more comprehensive than Katz & Lindell.

>LINE crypto integrity just got busted
Shit, and I was just thinking about making an account so I can talk to my brother who is in nipland