If GNU is so good, why don’t they have self-driving cars like Apple and etc?
If GNU is so good, why don’t they have self-driving cars like Apple and etc?
Owen Walker
Other urls found in this thread:
Sebastian Phillips
"Free" as in "no money"
Zachary Flores
>I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as SelfCruiseOS, is in fact, GNU/SelfCruiseOS, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus SelfCruiseOS. SelfCruiseOS is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Andrew Perez
busybox is running in every tesla so GNU actually has the best car faggot ;)
Free as in Foss you mean.
Gratis isn't prevented by GNU.
Even stallman says this.
You can make a GNU product and make money just like Tesla.
They don't give any money back but they have to release their source modifications.
Thomas Stewart
>If GNU is so good
They aren't
>why don’t they have self-driving cars like Apple and etc?
You have to wait until it's made then they ``clone'' the idea.
David Miller
GNU Project is for software, half of making self-driving cars is the hardware.
Ayden Morales
SPBP
God bless you user.
Top level kek.
Jackson Bell
Self driving cars is stuff made to milk money out of people. Nobody needs this shite.
Jason King
>self-driving cars
botnet in the design
Brandon Martinez
LMAO, busybox is GPLv2, that’s why it exists, an alternative to GNU coreutils that are GPLv3.
GNU is really GPLv3.
Jackson Gomez
parallel parking elisp macros ftw
Lucas Johnson
LMAO, this fag.
The car is the hardware.
The self driving part is obviously the software.
Logan Gutierrez
Tyler Campbell
Because Free Software is not a monopolized ecosystem of vendor lock-in.
For Windows servers and desktops, for example, Microsoft makes the Kernel. Microsoft makes the userland. Microsoft makes the web server. Microsoft makes the DNS server. Microsoft makes the DHCP server. Microsoft makes the Email server. Microsoft makes the browser. Microsoft makes the Email client. Microsoft makes them all proprietary and controls the entire stack on both sides, from top to bottom.
For Free Software systems, the development is decentralized. The kernel is made by a wide array of contributors and led by Linus Torvalds. The userland is made by the GNU project. the web server is made by Apache Foundation. The DNS and DHCP servers are made by the Internet Systems Consortium. The email server is made by Wietse Venema and various contributors.The Browser and email client are made by Mozilla. All of them are free software, and none of these people or organizations controls the entire stack. If one of these projects goes to shit, it can be discarded in favor of a replacement.
Anthony Myers
*runs over you*
Heh... nothin personal kid..
Carter Lewis
Relating this back to GNU and self-driving cars, since GNU doesn't run the entire stack, just the userland, it's not GNU's responsibility to make self-driving cars. Some other company can take Linus Torvalds's code, Richard Stallman's code, and of course the code of the contributors to their respective projects, and use them as a base to create the operating system of their self driving car, without paying any cost to either.
Nolan Morris
>The car is the hardware.
but whats the cadr?
Cooper Gutierrez
technically that project uses the MIT licence
James Cook
>self driving cars
this meme won't die until it runs over itself, will it?
Josiah Martinez
>the nobody needs it maymay
I can't take you guys seriously anymore.
Aiden Nelson
>You can make a GNU product and make money
found the fatal flaw before even finishing the sentence
Jackson Green
>github.com
LOL, will never work, and it's MIT, not GPLv3.
Levi Jackson
Nice try, but the thing is that there won't be a GNU self driving car.
Doesn't matter if you like them or not.
You won't be able to have a GNU self driving car.
Xavier Cruz