Windows still has the simplest and most elegant font rendering

Windows still has the simplest and most elegant font rendering.

Attached: Untitled.png (1058x590, 153K)

Other urls found in this thread:

framecompare.com/image-compare/screenshotcomparison/KWGWNNNX
ix.io/w6A
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>simplest and most elegant
is that the codeword for "it looks like shit and like it's from early 2000s"?
anyway, it looks like shit on modern displays (and by modern, I mean LCD and made in the last 5 years).

>fact incoming
Windows has the ugliest font rendering out there.

>t. hasn't used windows since 2007

>main pa0e

Attached: putin grinning.png (229x287, 96K)

Let's not get carried away there.

Attached: 1531319197718.png (595x391, 92K)

Attached: 1525974541708.gif (570x391, 26K)

DELET

Attached: 1505184236099.png (813x1402, 193K)

Then why is main page cut off

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-07-17 19-46-34.png (3840x2160, 1.54M)

>best font rendering
no such thing, just different sorts of crap aka antialiasing of a very low resolution shape

just buy yourself a hipdi monitor, you poorfag

Attached: 15155210055211.jpg (720x384, 60K)

Only Tokyo had good font, everything else is washed with Vaseline

But it's readable

Attached: Font rendering.jpg (3247x1625, 1.5M)

Attached: 1431476342164.png (802x830, 481K)

how the fuck did you manage to make it so good?

>he can't into proper screenshots

i sorta agree; only real solution is to add more pixels to it.

moonrunes do look amazing on Fedora though.

you realise it's 2160p with 110% zoom, right?

Nice. What font?

>This is what winbabbies actually believe

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 11.09.44.png (1073x1017, 500K)

Nice OS scaling, fag. See, I can do this too.

Attached: wew.png (2560x1440, 776K)

Blurry trash

>'I'okyo

Blurry

What DE?

How can we be in 2018 and still have applications depend on the OS for font rendering?

you might not even have a brain at this point

Strange way to spell perfect.
Let me guess you use 9pt aliased fonts for everything.

I use Windows but that is just a lie. Font rendering on it is utter garbage. Thank god for MacType

Go to work.

>The state of wincucks

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-07-17 20-58-27.png (266x180, 23K)

>installing chink botnet on your system
You're doing great, bud

Attached: 1531278459952.png (449x442, 151K)

yikes

Attached: 2018-07-17-130241_44x16_scrot.png (44x16, 423)

how bad is it Jow Forums?

Attached: 2018-07-17-130652_1920x1080_scrot.png (1920x1080, 1.05M)

Attached: render.png (1884x742, 444K)

though i usually can't stand hinting, it's subtle, crisp and readable. i like it.

nice runes, fag

Attached: Screenshot_20180717_135519.png (1073x939, 246K)

Better than Linux but have you never used a mac?

Attached: 120330_flutegingrichborderfence_v9.jpg (1600x1200, 471K)

I can't agree with that. On 1080p the font rendering is just not that good at all. I'm not sure what KDE Neon uses for font rendering, but that properly set up happens to look much better and more readable. Not as sharp as Windows, not as blurry as macOS. Just good.

it's called a ligature, genius

Attached: thXM0KN60B.jpg (110x110, 3K)

stop posting bait

kek'd hard

Attached: 1524470087527.gif (570x391, 22K)

Attached: 1521625538342.png (662x580, 126K)

your scaling is shit.

here we go bois. you can'd do better than this.

Attached: 1502622931272.png (1391x1960, 848K)

thank's for proving my point?

Attached: 2018.jpg (550x398, 97K)

that looks like shit. people think it's good because it's large. the font is atrocious.

why are you using Helvetica, a display font without subpixel rendering at 10pt sizes, that's meant for display and 40+pt sizes? why don't you use SF Text? are you retarded or just a troll / hater who wants to make himself look like a moron?

and why are you responding to obvious, ancient bait?

bow down

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 14.26.32.png (2144x2570, 1.79M)

>he thinks font rendering even matters at that dpi
user, come on

font != font rendering.
Grow a brain

I could boot into W7 to show you just how much worse it looks

Togyo

Attached: Screenshot_20180717_074810.png (2560x1440, 546K)

Is this the new placebo thread?

Attached: 2018-07-17-075349_1920x1080_scrot.png (1920x1080, 496K)

please do, but only if you use the same ppi.

framecompare.com/image-compare/screenshotcomparison/KWGWNNNX

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 14.56.54.png (1919x2312, 688K)

Attached: untitled.png (1280x720, 447K)

That looks like an upscale and not the natural res tho

>that upscale
you're not even trying

Attached: 317.png (500x501, 90K)

I took a screenshot in vm running same res, gonna boot into it now brb
It is weird it came out half the size

Attached: looks fine to me.jpg (1919x991, 288K)

Attached: Untitled3.png (2880x1800, 957K)

i honestly don't know how many more attempts it's going to take you to post a screenshot of the same scale as the original

I think it's just that windows isn't able to fully use the 2xpixel density of the retina display.

Attached: Untitled4.png (961x1037, 60K)

okay, i guess you're not just pretending to be retarded.

here's a tip. open the original screenshot at 100% scaling in a browser window. then open another window with wikipedia. use CTRL+mousewheel until the sizes of the 2 wikipedia logos match up. google how to take a screenshot and post it here.

Linux is a kernel and does not render fonts.

I can downscale my OS X display, but then everything is 2x pixel size

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 15.34.23.png (1664x1970, 1.3M)

is font rendering all one big troll? i can literally not tell a difference between any of these images unless the font changes

pretty much. it hardly matters in 2018 since most people use fairly high resolution displays.

shit
horrible font and it's irrelevant at that size
way too bold
good
install noto sans/serif cjk jp
heh
needs hinting, but otherwise good
looks good of course, but at that resolution even shitty w10 font rendering looks good
best in thread desu

am i the only one who seriously gives no fucks about font rendering as long as it's not obviously super aliased?

>using anything else than 1.0

Can't beat Android

Attached: Screenshot_20180717-075329.png (1440x2560, 793K)

...how did you manage to make it look like shit? is it because it actually renders at 1080 and then upscales to 1440? it's not like it matters at that ppi but wow

>meanwhile on android

Attached: Screenshot_20180717-081000.png (1080x1920, 595K)

Strangely yes. Did they do something in the newest Windows 10 update or something?
Fonts in Firefox on Windows 10 look perfect on my displays now. MacOS, in comparison, looks blurry and terrible (doesn't matter how I change the value in the .plist) and Linux... well, Ubuntu looks great, other distros suck.

That's not the problem brainlet. It should be Jumps

Here's IOS, for comparison.

Attached: notch.png (1125x2436, 416K)

It's open source tho

>that blur
I can immediately tell this is macOS.

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-07-17 18-13-02.png (943x913, 395K)

win 7 sp1 font arial is absolutely disgusting
it's FAT and unpleasant to read

yea in the same way that a shit is brown but it's a shit

picrelated

Attached: fonts-or8.png (1250x1732, 75K)

why are some words in the bottom sentence crossed out?

okay, seriously...

what the fuck is this shit and why is it only on the right side?

Attached: 1531840241502.png (1080x1920, 604K)

>I could boot into W7 to show you just how much worse it looks
so you're gonna make a statement and pretend you're too retarded to provide proof?

>Be dual boot guy.
>See linux has shit font rendering meme on Jow Forums
>Actually reboot into windows and screenshot wiki Tokyo
>Actually reboot into gnu/linux and screenshot wiki Tokyo
>Actually composite screenshots and post screenshot.png explaining windows 10 and gnu/linux default font rendering running on same hardware.
>All windows fanbois actually agree windows looks better.
>mfw I have no face.

That looks very good. What settings and font?

Oops, meant for , sorry.

Attached: debian stretch.png (1280x800, 255K)

ix.io/w6A

The font is liberation sans/serif. Just make sure you don't install Noto as there's a mix-up in the aliases which prioritizes it over metric compatible fonts. It's only true in the case of vanilla ENG Noto, though. You can install it for, say, Japanese and it'll be fine.

Nice, thank you!

Humm..

This is Linux

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-07-18 02-54-01.png (3596x1246, 707K)

rate

Attached: gooks.png (2528x1328, 471K)

Are you stupid, or just pretending?
Ligatures exist to get rid of ugly spacing, not to forcefully induce it.

The funniest part is that people constantly shitting on windows font rendering just means windows continues to refine its process. Meanwhile alternatives have stagnated and look quite blurry and over-softened.

So thanks again shitposters! :3

>:3
Proprietary software is not allowed here.

Yours is the best, what font/settings?